Symmetry and humans: Reply to Mithen's 'Sexy handaxe theory'

Antiquity

Volumn 83, Issue 319, 2009, Pages 195-198

  Hodgson, Derek ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952907688     PISSN: 0003598X     EISSN: 0003598X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0003598X00098197     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BECK, D.M., M.A. PINSK & S. KASTNER. 2005. Symmetry perception in humans and macaques. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(9): 405-406
2. BOYER, P. & P. LIéNARD. 2006. Why ritualized behaviour in humans? Precaution systems and action-parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29(6): 595-613.
3. DRIVER, J., G.C. BAYLIS & R. RAFAL. 1992. Preserved figure-ground segregation and symmetry detection in visual neglect. Nature 360: 73-75
4. ENQUIST, M. & A. ARAK. 1994. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature 372: 169-172
5. FISKE, A.P. & N. HASLAM. 1997. Is obsessive-compulsive disorder a pathology of the human disposition to perform socially meaningful rituals? Evidence of similar content. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 185(4): 211-222
6. HODGSON, D. 2005. More on Acheulean tools. Current Anthropology 46(4): 647-650
7. HODGSON, D. In press. Evolution of the visual cortex and the emergence of symmetry in the Acheulean techno-complex. Comptes rendus Palevol.
8. KALICK, S.M., L.A. ZEBROWITZ, J.H. LANGLOIS & R.M. JOHNSON. 1998. Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Psychological Science 9(1): 8-13.
9. KOEHLER, N.,G. RHODES & L.W. SIMMONS. 2002. Are human female preferences for symmetrical male faces enhanced when conception is likely? Animal Behaviour 64(2): 233-238
10. KOHN, M. & S.MITHEN. 1999. Handaxes: products of sexual selection? Antiquity 73: 518-526
11. LANGLOIS, J.H., L.A. ROGGMAN & L. MUSSELMAN. 1994. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science 5(4): 214-220
12. MACHIN, A.J. 2008. Why handaxes just aren't that sexy: a response to Kohn & Mithen (1999). Antiquity 82: 761-766
13. MITHEN, S. 2008. 'Whatever turns you on': a response to Anna Machin, 'Why handaxes just aren't that sexy'. Antiquity 82: 766-769
14. POLAK, M. (ed.) 2003. Developmental instability: causes and consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. RAMACHANDRAN, V.S. & W.HIRSTEIN. 1999. The science of art: a neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6(6-7): 15-51.
16. REBER, R. 2002. Reasons for the preference for symmetry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25: 415-416
17. REBER. R.,N. SCHWARZ & P. WINKIELMAN. 2004. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review 8(4): 364-382
18. RHODES, G. 2006. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 57: 199-226.
19. RHODES, G., A. SUMICH&G. BYATT. 1999 Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science 10(1): 52-58
20. RHODES, G., L.A. ZEBROWITZ, A. CLARK, S.M. KALICK, A. HIGHTOWER & R. MCKAY. 2001. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior 22(1): 31-46.
21. SWADDLE, J.P. & I.C. CUTHILL. 1995. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261(1360): 111-116
22. TOMKINS, J.L. & L.W. SIMMONS. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection: paradigm shifts, publication bias and observer expectation, in M. Polak (ed.) Developmental instability: causes and consequences: 231-261 Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. TYLER, C.W., H.A. BASELER & B.A. WANDELL. 1998. Cortical regions responding to long-range symmetry patterns. Available online: http://www.ski.org/CWTylerlab/CWTyler/PrePublications/SFN1998/SymmNatureNeuro. html.
24. VALENTINE, T., S.DARLING&M. DONNELY. 2004. Why are average faces attractive? The effect of view and averageness on the attractiveness of female faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(3): 482-487
25. VAN DER ZWAN, R., E. LEO, W. JOUNG, C. LATIMER & P. WENDEROTH. 1998. Evidence that both area V1 and extrastriate visual cortex contribute to symmetry perception. Current Biology 8(15/16): 889-892
26. WAGEMANS, J. 1997. Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 346-352
27. WOLFE, J.M. & S.R. FRIEDMAN-HILL. 1992. On the role of symmetry in visual search. Psychological Science 3: 194-198