Predictors of locally advanced and metastatic disease in patients with small renal masses

BJU International

Volumn 109, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 1463-1467

  Kates, Max ^a   Korets, Ruslan ^a   Sadeghi, Neda ^a   Pierorazio, Phillip M ^b   McKiernan, James M ^a  

^a College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

neoplasm metastasis; renal cell carcinoma; SEER Program

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER REGISTRY; CANCER STAGING; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METASTASIS; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME; UNITED STATES;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SEER PROGRAM; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84860337277     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10553.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK,. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1331-4
2. Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB,. Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 2006; 176: 1317-20
3. Wunderlich H, Reichelt O, Schumann S, et al,. Nephron sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4 cm, or less in diameter: indicated or under treated? J Urol 1998; 159: 1465-9
4. Thompson RH, Hill JR, Babayev Y, et al,. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma risk according to tumor size. J Urol 2009; 182: 41-5
5. Kunkle DA, Crispen PL, Li T, Uzzo RG,. Tumor size predicts synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: implications for surveillance of small renal masses. J Urol 2007; 177: 1692-6
6. Nguyen MM, Gill IS,. Effect of renal cancer size on the prevalence of metastasis at diagnosis and mortality. J Urol 2009; 181: 1020-7
7. Klatte T, Patard JJ, de Martino M, et al,. Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas. J Urol 2008; 179: 1719-26
8. Kume H, Suzuki M, Fujimura T, et al,. Distant metastasis of renal cell carcinoma with a diameter of 3 cm or less-which is aggressive cancer? J Urol 2010; 184: 64-8
9. Jamis-Dow CA, Choyke PL, Jennings SB, Linehan WM, Thakore KN, Walther MM,. Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation. Radiology 1996; 198: 785-8
10. Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T, et al,. The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 2000; 164: 1143-7
11. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, Bloom DA, Corless CL, Adams DF,. Small (< or = 3 cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163: 597-605
12. Nguyen MM, Gill IS,. Coded tumor size may be unreliable for small metastatic renal cancers in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results dataset. Urology 2010; 75: 266-70
13. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2010
14. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H,. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003; 170: 2217-20
15. Remzi M, Katzenbeisser D, Waldert M, et al,. Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small. BJU Int 2007; 99: 1002-6
16. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al,. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182: 1271-9
17. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG,. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008; 179: 1227-33
18. Laudano MA, Klafter FE, Katz M, et al,. Pathological tumour diameter predicts risk of conventional subtype in small renal cortical tumours. BJU Int 2008; 102: 1385-8
19. Bell ET,. A classification of renal tumors with observations on the frequency of the various types. J Urol 1938; 39: 238-43
20. Herrlinger A, Schott G, Schafhauser W, Schrott KM,. The significance of tumor diameter in renal cell carcinoma. Urologe A 1992; 31: 70-5