Pathological tumour diameter predicts risk of conventional subtype in small renal cortical tumours

BJU International

Volumn 102, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1385-1388

  Laudano, Melissa A ^a   Klafter, Farrah E ^a   Katz, Mark ^a   McCann, Tara R ^a   Desai, Manisha ^b   Benson, Mitchell C ^a   McKiernan, James M ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b Columbia University Medical Center ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Histological subtype; RCC; Tumour diameter

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY TUMOR; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CORTEX; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 54949113261     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07876.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Volpe A, Panzarella T, Rendon RA, Haider MA, Kondylis FI, Jewett MA. The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 2004 100 : 738 45
2. Rendon RA, Stanietzky N, Panzarella T et al. The natural history of small renal masses. J Urol 2000 164 : 1143 7
3. Wehle MJ, Thiel DD, Petrou SP, Young PR, Frank I, Karsteadt N. Conservative management of incidental contrast-enhancing renal masses as safe alternative to invasive therapy. Urology 2004 64 : 49 52
4. Mejean A, Oudard S, Thiounn N. Prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2003 169 : 821 7
5. Moch H, Gasser T, Amin MB, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ. Prognostic utility of the recently recommended histologic classification and revised TNM staging system of renal cell carcinoma: a Swiss experience with 588 tumors. Cancer 2000 89 : 604 14
6. Yaycioglu O, Rutman MP, Balasubramaniam M, Peters KM, Gonzalez JA. Clinical and pathologic tumor size in renal cell carcinoma; difference, correlation, and analysis of the influencing factors. Urology 2002 60 : 33 8
7. Storkel S, Eble JN, Adlakha K et al. Classification of renal cell carcinoma: workgroup No. 1. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer 1997 80 : 987 9
8. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML. Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003 27 : 612 24
9. Amin MB, Amin MB, Tamboli P et al. Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2002 26 : 281 91
10. Dechet CB, Zincke H, Sebo TJ et al. Prospective analysis of computerized tomography and needle biopsy with permanent sectioning to determine the nature of solid renal masses in adults. J Urol 2003 169 : 71 4
11. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 2003 170 : 2217 20
12. Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB. Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 2006 176 : 1317 20
13. Hsu RM, Chan DY, Siegelman SS. Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004 182 : 551 7
14. Lau WK, Cheville JC, Blute ML, Weaver AL, Zincke H. Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology 2002 59 : 532 7
15. McKiernan J, Yossepowitch O, Kattan MW et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors: pathologic findings and impact on outcome. Urology 2002 60 : 1003 9