Small (≤3-cm) renal masses: Detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation

Radiology

Volumn 198, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 785-788

  Jamis Dow, Carlos A ^a,b   Choyke, Peter L ^a   Jennings, Scott B ^b   Linehan, W Marston ^b   Thakore, Kailash N ^a   Walther, McClellan M ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography (CT), comparative studies; Kidney neoplasms; Ultrasound (US), comparative studies; von Hippel Lindau disease

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VON HIPPEL LINDAU DISEASE; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; CARCINOMA, PAPILLARY; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HIPPEL-LINDAU DISEASE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0029671182     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.198.3.8628872     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Amendola MA, Bree RL, Pollack HM, et al. Small renal cell carcinomas: resolving a diagnostic dilemma. Radiology 1988; 166:637-641.
2. Levine E, Huntrakoon M, Wetzel LH. Small renal neoplasms: clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. AJR 1989; 153:69-73.
3. Prati GF, Sagein P, Boschiero L, Martini PT, Montemezzi S, Muolo A. Small renal-cell carcinomas: clinical and imaging features. Urol Int 1993; 51:19-22.
4. Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L, et al. Detection of renal masses: sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology 1988; 169: 363-365.
5. Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, Levitt RG, Geisse G. Computed tomography of the kidney. Radiology 1977; 124:359-370.
6. McClennan BL, Stanley RJ, Melson GL, Levitt RG, Sagel SS. CT of the renal cyst: is cyst aspiration necessary? AJR 1979; 133:671-675.
7. Lingard DA, Lawson TL. Accuracy of ultrasound in predicting the nature of renal masses. J Urol 1979; 122:724-727.
8. Woolson RF. Statistical methods for the analysis of biomedical data. New York, NY: Wiley, 1987; 280-313.
9. Curry NS. Small renal masses (lesions smaller than 3 cm): imaging evaluation and management. AJR 1995; 164:355-362.
10. Sussman SK, Illescas FF, Opalacz JF, Yirga P, Foley LC. Renal streak artifact during contrast-enhanced CT: comparison of low versus high osmolality contrast media. Abdom Imaging 1993; 18:180-185.
11. Silverman SG, Lee BY, Seltzer SE, Bloom DA, Corless CL, Adams DF. Small (≤3-cm) renal masses: correlation of spiral CT features and pathologic findings. AJR 1994; 163:597-605
12. Bosniak MA. Small (≤3.0-cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies. Radiology 1991; 179:307-314.