Protecting the idyll but not the environment: Second homes, amenity migration and rural exclusion in Washington State

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 174-182

  Kondo, Michelle C ^a   Rivera, Rebeca ^a   Rullman, Stan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Amenity migration; Mixed method research; Second homes

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION;

AMENITY MIGRATION; ECOLOGICAL EFFECT; ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS; INTERVIEW ANALYSIS; MIGRATION PROCESS; MIXED METHOD; SECOND HOMES; SPATIAL ISOLATION;

ECOLOGY;

AMENITY; HOME RANGE; HOMEOWNER; MIGRATION DETERMINANT; POLICY MAKING; URBAN POLICY;

UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84860331682     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Abbey D.G. Cluster zoning: A citizen's handbook for better land use 1973, Harvard University, Regional Field Service, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
2. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical Analysis 1995, 27:93.
3. Anselin L. GeoDa™ 0.9 user's guide 2003, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, Center for Spatially Integrated Social Science.
4. Arnold C., Gibbons J. Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator. Journal of the American Planning Association 1996, 62:243-258.
5. Bernard H.R. Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative methods 2002, AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
6. Beyers W., Nelson P.B. Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan West: New insights from rapidly growing communities. Journal of Rural Studies 2000, 16:459-474.
7. Bishop P.C., Beers T.M., Hightower S.D., National Association of Realtors, Research Division The National Association of Realtors profile of second-home buyers 2004, National Association of Realtors, Research Division, Chicago, IL.
8. Boyle P., Halfacree K. Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues 1998, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
9. Brown D.G., Johnson K.M., Loveland T.R., Theobald D.M. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1851-1863.
10. Bryson J., Wyckoff W. Rural gentrification and nature in the Old and New Wests. Journal of Cultural Geography 2010, 27:53-75.
11. Buller H., Lowe P. Rural development in post-war Britain and France. Rural Studies in Britain and France 1990, 21-36. Belhaven Press, London. P. Lowe, M. Bodiguel (Eds.).
12. Cadieux K. Competing discourses of nature in exurbia. GeoJournal 2011, 76:341-363.
13. Charnley S., McLain R., Donoghue E. Forest management policy, amenity migration, and community well-being in the American West: Reflections from the Northwest forest plan. Human Ecology 2008, 36:743-761.
14. Clark J.K., McChesney R., Munroe D.K., Irwin E.G. Spatial characteristics of exurban settlement pattern in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 90:178-188.
15. Clendenning G., Field D., Kapp K. A comparison of seasonal homeowners and permanent residents on their attitudes toward wildlife management on public lands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2005, 10:3-18.
16. Cloke P., Thrift N. Intra-class conflict in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 1987, 3:321-333.
17. Cocheba, D. J., Loomis, R. A., Weeks, E. E., 1973. The land market and economic development: A case study of San Juan county, Washington.
18. Darling E. The city in the country: Wilderness gentrification and the rent gap. Environment and Planning A 2005, 37:1015-1032.
19. Deller S.C., Lledo V., Marcouiller D.W. Modeling regional economic growth with a focus on amenities. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies 2008, 20:1-21.
20. Fontana A., Frey J.A. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. Handbook of qualitative research 2000, 645-672. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
21. Forman R.T.T., Alexander L.E. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1998, 29:207-231.
22. Frentz I.C., Farmer F.L., Guldin J.M., Smith K.G. Insights and applications: Public lands and population growth. Society and Natural Resources 2004, 17:57-68.
23. Friedberger M. Rural gentrification and livestock raising: Texas as a test case, 1940-95. Rural history: Economy, Society, Culture 1996, 7:53.
24. Ghose R. Big sky or big sprawl? Rural gentrification and the changing cultural landscape of Missoula, Montana. Urban Geography 2004, 25:528-549.
25. Gosnell H., Abrams J. Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. GeoJournal 2011, 76:303-322.
26. Gurran N., Blakely E.J. Suffer a sea change? Contrasting perspectives towards urban policy and migration in coastal Australia. Australian Geographer 2007, 38:113-131.
27. Halfacree K.H. Talking about rurality: Social representations of the rural as expressed by residents of six english parishes. Journal of Rural Studies 1995, 11:1-20.
28. Hall C.M., Müller D.K. Tourism, mobility, and second homes: Between elite landscape and common ground 2004, Channel View Publications, Clevedon, UK/Buffalo.
29. Hansen A.J., Knight R.L., Marzluff J.M., Powell S., Brown K., Gude P.H., et al. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:1893-1905.
30. Hansen A.J., Rasker R., Maxwell B., Rotella J.J., Johnson J.D., Parmenter A.W., et al. Ecological causes and consequences of demographic change in the New West. BioScience 2002, 52:151-163.
31. Hines J.D. The persistent frontier and the rural gentrification of the rocky mountain West. Journal of the West 2007, 46:63-73.
32. Hines J.D. Rural gentrification as permanent tourism: The creation of the 'New' West Archipelago as postindustrial cultural space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2010, 28:509-525.
33. Hines J.D The post-industrial regime of production/consumption and the rural gentrification of the new West Archipelago. Antipode 2011, 1-29.
34. Hunter L.M., Boardman J.D., Saint Onge J.M. The association between natural amenities, rural population growth, and long-term residents' economic well-being. Rural Sociology 2005, 70:452-470.
35. Hutyra L.R., Yoon B., Hepinstall-Cymerman J., Alberti M. Carbon consequences of land cover change and expansion of urban lands: A case study in the Seattle metropolitan region. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 103:83-93.
36. Knight R.L, Wallace G.N., Riebsame W.E. Ranching the view: Subdivisions versus agriculture. Conservation Biology 1995, 9:459-461.
37. Kwang-Koo K., Marcouiller D.W., Deller S.C. Natural amenities and rural development: Understanding spatial and distributional attributes. Growth and Change 2005, 36:273-298.
38. Luka N. Of McMansins, timeshare cottages, and Zebra Mussels: Dispatches from the second-home settings of central Ontario. The rural-urban fringe in Canada: Conflict and controversy 2010, 199-220. Rural Development Institute, Brandon University, Brandon, MB. K.B. Beesley (Ed.).
39. Marcouiller D.W., Clendenning J.G., Kedzior R. Natural amenity-led development and rural planning. Journal of Planning Literature 2002, 16:515-542.
40. Marzluff J.M., Bradley G.A. Ecological restoration in the urban-wildland interface. Ecological restoration of Southwestern Ponderosa pine forests 2003, 353-370. Island Press, Washington D.C. P. Friederici (Ed.).
41. McCarthy J. Rural geography: Globalizing the countryside. Progress in Human Geography 2008, 32:129-137.
42. McGranahan D.A. Natural amenities drive rural population change, economic research service 1999, USDA, Washington, D.C.
43. McGranahan D.A. Landscape influence on recent rural migration in the U.S. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 85:228-240.
44. McIntyre N., Williams D., McHugh K. Multiple dwelling and tourism negotiating place, home, and identity 2006, CABI Pub, Wallingford; Cambridge, Massachusetts.
45. Michaud K., Carlisle J.E., Smith E.R.A.N. Nimbyism vs. environmentalism in attitudes toward energy development. Environmental Politics 2008, 17:20-39.
46. Nepal S.K., Jamal T.B. Resort-induced changes in small mountain communities in British Columbia, Canada. Mountain Research and Development 2011, 31:89-101.
47. Nielsen J.M., Shelby B., Haas J.E. Sociological carrying capacity and last settler syndrome. Pacific Sociological Review 1977, 20:568-581.
48. Phillips M. Rural gentrification and the processes of class colonization. Journal of Rural Studies 1993, 9:123-140.
49. Phillips M. Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geography 2004, 28:5-30.
50. Radeloff V.C., Stewart S.I., Hawbaker T.J., Gimmi U., Pidgeon A.M., Flather C.H., et al. Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2010, 107:940-945.
51. Rasker R., Hansen A. Natural amenities and population growth in the greater yellowstone region. Human Ecology Review 2000, 7:30-40.
52. Riebsame W.E., Gosnell H., Theobald D.M. Land use and landscape change in the Colorado Mountains I: Theory, scale, and pattern. Mountain Research and Development 1996, 16:395-405.
53. Robinson L., Newell Joshua P., Marzluff John M. Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: Growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005, 71:51-72.
54. Rudzitis G. Amenities increasingly draw people to the rural West. Rural Development Perspectives 1999, 14:9-13.
55. Rudzitis G., Streatfeild R.A. The importance of amenities and attitudes: A Washington example. Journal of Environmental Systems 1993, 22:269.
56. San Juan County Health and Community Services, 2004. San Juan County Water Resource Management Plan, Funded by the Washington State Department of Ecology, adopted by the San Juan County Board of County Commissioners October, 2004.
57. San Juan County Parks Department, San Juan County Land Bank, San Juan County Public Works Department, 2005. Plan for Parks, Recreation, and Preserved Lands for San Juan County, San Juan County.
58. Sandberg L.A., Wekerle G.R. Reaping nature's dividends: The neoliberalization and gentrification of nature on the oak ridges moraine. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2010, 12:41-57.
59. Schnaiberg J., Riera J., Turner M.G., Voss P.R. Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA. Environmental Management 2002, 30:24-34.
60. Shellito B.A., Pijanowski B.C. Using neural nets to model the spatial distribution of seasonal homes. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 2003, 30:281-290.
61. Shields C.A, Band L.E., Law N., Groffman P.M., Kaushal S.S., Savvas K., et al. Streamflow distribution of non-point source nitrogen export from urban-rural catchments in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Water Resources Research 2008, 44.
62. Smith D.P., Phillips D.A. Socio-cultural representations of greentrified Pennine rurality. Journal of Rural Studies 2001, 17:457-469.
63. Smith M.D., Krannich R.S. Culture Clash revisited: Newcomer and longer-term residents' attitudes toward land use, development, and environmental issues in rural communities in the Rocky Mountain West. Rural Sociology 2000, 65:396.
64. Stynes D.J., Zheng J., Stewart S.I. Seasonal homes and natural resources: Patterns of use and impact in Michigan. United States Department of Agriculture 1997.
65. Taylor L. No boundaries: Exurbia and the study of contemporary urban dispersion. GeoJournal 2009, 1-17.
66. Theobald D.M. Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringes. Geographical Review 2001, 91:544-564.
67. Theobald D.M. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecology and Society 2005, 10.
68. Theobald D.M., Gosnell H., Riebsame W.E. Land use and landscape change in the Colorado Mountains II: A case study of the East River Valley. Mountain Research and Development 1996, 16:407-418.
69. U.S. Census Bureau, 1990. U.S. Census 1990.
70. U.S. Census Bureau, 2000. U.S. Census 2000.
71. U.S. Census Bureau, 2009. American Community Survey 2005-2009.
72. U.S. Census Bureau, 2010. U.S. Census 2010.
73. Walker P. Commentary for special issue of Geojournal on amenity migration exurbia, and emerging rural landscapes. GeoJournal 2011, 76:441-444.
74. Walker P., Fortmann L. Whose landscape?. A political ecology of the 'exurban' Sierra. Cultural Geographies 2003, 10:469-491.
75. Walker P.A. Reconsidering 'regional' political ecologies: Toward a political ecology of the rural American West. Progress in Human Geography. 2003, 27:7-24.
76. Washington Biodiversity Project, 2007. Washington's Ecoregions.
77. Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife, 2005. Washington's Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy.
78. Wheeler S.M., Beebe C.W. The rise of the postmodern metropolis: Spatial evolution of the Sacramento metropolitan region. Journal of Urban Design 2011, 16:307-332.
79. Wilson F.D. Components of change in migration destination-propensity rates for metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas: 1935-1980. Demography 1988, 25:129-139.
80. Woods M. Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring 2005, SAGE, London.
81. Woodward J., Damon B. Housing Characteristics: 2000. Census 2000 Brief 2001, U.S. Census Bureau, Economics and Statistics Administration, Washington D.C.