Comparison of hydrogen embrittlement in three pipeline steels in high pressure gaseous hydrogen environments

Corrosion Science

Volumn 59, Issue , 2012, Pages 1-9

  Nanninga, N E ^a   Levy, Y S ^a   Drexler, E S ^a   Condon, R T ^a   Stevenson, A E ^a   Slifka, A J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

A. Steel; C. Hydrogen embrittlement

Indexed keywords

FRACTURE MORPHOLOGY; GASEOUS HYDROGEN; HIGH PRESSURE; HYDROGEN GAS ENVIRONMENT; HYDROGEN GAS PRESSURE; PIPELINE STEEL; REDUCTION OF AREAS; X100 PIPELINES;

CERIUM ALLOYS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE TESTING; STEEL PIPE;

HYDROGEN;

EID: 84860229248     PISSN: 0010938X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2012.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fuel cell and hydrogen energy association: transportation, /index.php?id=53 (accessed January 3, 2012). http://www.fchea.org.
2. 2010 Fuel cell technologies market report, June 2011, Department of Energy, /hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/2010_market_report.pdf (accessed January 3, 2012). http://www1.eere.energy.gov.
3. W.C. Leighty, B.P. Somerday, C. San Marchi, J. Holloway, M. Rupert, G. Kieth, D.E. White, Compressorless hydrogen transmission pipelines deliver large-scale stranded renewable energy at competitive cost, in: Proceedings of the Power-Gen International Conference, Las Vegas, NV, 2006.
4. C. Retzke, P. Mulard, M. Wenske, The ENERTRAG-Hybrid Power Plant, /docs/Meetings/Australia_5-09/Germany%20-%20Enertrag.pdf (accessed January 26, 2012). http://www.iphe.net.
5. L.C. Uson, I.A. Aguarta, L.R. Elu, E. Burkhalter, A. Hermosilla, Green hydrogen from wind and solar: design, construction and one year operation of the ITHER project, in: Proceedings of the 17th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 2008, /docs/WHEC2008ITHER.pdf (accessed January 26, 2012). http://task24.hidrogenoaragon.org.
6. H.J. Cialone, J.H. Holbrook, Sensitivity of steels to degradation in gaseous hydrogen. Hydrogen Embrittlment: Prevention and Control, Los Angeles, CA, 1985, pp. 134-152.
7. Nanninga N.E., Slifka A.J., Levy Y.S., White C. A review of fatigue crack growth for pipeline steels exposed to hydrogen. J. Res. NIST 2010, 115:1-16.
8. C. Sanmarchi, B.P. Somerday, K. Nibur K, D.G. Stalheim, T. Boggess, S. Jansto, Fracture and fatigue of commercial grade API pipeline steels in gaseous hydrogen, in: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels & Piping Conference, Bellevue, WA, pp. 1-10.
9. C. San Marchi, B.P. Somerday, Technical reference on hydrogen compatibility of Materials: Plain carbon ferritic steels: C-Mn alloys (code 1100), Sandia National Laboratories, October 2010, /matlsTechRef/ (accessed January 3, 2012). http://www.sandia.gov.
10. F. Bolzon, M. Cabrin, C. Spinelli, Hydrogen diffusion and hydrogen embrittlement behaviour of two high strength pipeline steels, in: EUROCORR 2001: The European Corrosion Congress, Lake Garda, Italy, 2001, p. 10.
11. Capelle J., Gilgert J., Dmytrakh I., Pluvinage G. Sensitivity of pipeline steel API X52 to hydrogen embrittlement. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 2008, 33:7630-7641.
12. Brass A.M., Chene J. Influence of tensile straining on the permeation of hydrogen in low alloy Cr-Mo steels. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48:481-497.
13. M.S. de Santa Maria, R.P.M. Procter, Environmental cracking (corrosion fatigue and hydrogen embrittlment) X-70 linepipe steel, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fatigue and Crack Growth in Offshore Structures, London, England, 1986, pp. 101-108.
14. Hardie D., Charles E.A., Lopez A.H. Hydrogen embrittlement of high strength pipeline steels. Corros. Sci. 2006, 48:4378-4385.
15. A. Duncan, P.-S. Lam, T. Adams, Tensile testing of carbon steel in high pressure hydrogen, in: Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2007, pp. 1-7.
16. Nibur K.A., Somerday B.P., Balch D.K., San Marchi C. Sustained load cracking of steels for hydrogen storage and delivery. Effects of Hydrogen on Materials 2008, 341-348. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
17. Moro I., Briottet I., Lemione P., Andrieu E., Blanc C., Odemer G., Chene J., Jambon F. Damage under high pressure hydrogen environment of a high strength pipeline steel X80. Effects of Hydrogen on Materials 2008, 357-364. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
18. Xu K., Rana M. Tensile and fracture properties of carbon and low alloy steels in high pressure hydrogen. Effects of Hydrogen on Materials 2008, 357-364. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
19. Nelson H.G. Hydrogen-induced slow crack growth of a plain carbon pipeline steel under conditions of cyclic loading. Effects of Hydrogen on Materials 2008, 602-611. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
20. Gangloff R.P. Science-based prognosis to manage structural alloy performance in hydrogen. Effects of Hydrogen on Materials 2008, 1-21. ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
21. R.P. Gangloff, R.P. Wei, Small crack-environment interactions; the hydrogen embrittlement perspective, in: Small fatigue cracks; Proceedings of the Second Engineering Foundation International Conference/Workshop, Santa Barbara, CA, 1986, pp. 239-264.
22. Mustapha A., Charles E.A., Hardie D. Evaluation of environment-assisted cracking susceptibility of a grade X100 pipeline steel. Corros. Sci. 2012, 54:5-9.
23. Loginow A.W., Phelps E. Steels for seamless hydrogen pressure vessels. Corrosion 1975, 31:404-412.
24. Lufrano J., Sofronis P. Enhanced hydrogen concentrations ahead of rounded notches and cracks - competition between plastic strain and hydrostatic stress. Acta Mater. 1998, 46:1519-1526.
25. Novak P., Yuan R., Somerday B.P., Sofronis P., Ritchie R.O. A statistical, physical-based, micro-mechanical model of hydrogen-induced intergranular fracture in steel. J Mech. Phys. Solids 2010, 58:206-226.
26. Nanninga N., Grochowski J., Heldt L., Rundman K. The role of microstructure, composition and hardness in resisting hydrogen embrittlment of fastener grade steels. Corros. Sci. 2010, 52:1237-1246.
27. Huang F., Liu J., Deng Z.J., Cheng J.H., Lu Z.H., Li X.G. Effect of microstructure and inclusions on hydrogen induced cracking susceptibility and hydrogen trapping efficiency of X120 pipeline steel. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2010, 527:6997-7001.
28. Fragiel A., Serna S., Campillo B., Cota L. Dissimilar mechanical properties - microstructures microalloyed pipeline steels cracking performance under sour environment. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2007, 467:1-7.
29. Sojka J., Jerome M., Sozanska M., Vanova P., Rytirova L., Jonsta P. Role of microstructure and testing conditions in sulphide stress cracking of X52 and X60 steels. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 2008, 480:237-243.
30. Venegas V., Caleyo F., Baudin T., Espina-Hernandez J.H., Hallen J.M. On the role of crystallographic texture in mitigating hydrogen-induced cracking in pipeline steels. Corros. Sci. 2011, 53:4202-4212.
31. Venegas V., Caleyo F., Gonzalez J.L., Baudin T., Hallen J.M., Penelle R. EBSD study of hydrogen-induced cracking in API-5 L-X46 pipeline steel. Scripta Mater. 2005, 52:147-152.