Surgical outcome and risk stratification for primary retinal detachment repair: Results from the Scottish Retinal Detachment study

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 730-734

  Mitry, Danny ^a,b   Awan, M A ^c   Borooah, S ^a   Rehman Siddiqui, M A ^d   Brogan, K ^e   Fleck, B W ^a   Wright, A ^b   Campbell, H ^b   Singh, J ^a   Charteris, D G ^f   Yorston, D ^c  

^a PRINCESS ALEXANDRA EYE PAVILION   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c GARTNAVEL GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^e NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA DETACHMENT SURGERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STRATIFICATION; UNITED KINGDOM; VITRECTOMY; VITREORETINOPATHY;

ENDOTAMPONADE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETINA; RETINAL DETACHMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCLERAL BUCKLING; SCOTLAND; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 84860224872     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300581     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schaal S, Sherman MP, Barr CC, et al. Primary retinal detachment repair: comparison of 1-year outcomes of four surgical techniques. Retina 2011;31:1500-4.
2. Hikichi T, Kosaka S, Takami K, et al. Surgical outcomes of 23- and 20-gauge vitrectomies for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with posterior vitreous detachment. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011;42:376-82.
3. Johnson Z, Ramsay A, Cottrell D, et al. Triple cycle audit of primary retinal detachment surgery. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:513-18.
4. Day S, Grossman DS, Mruthyunjaya P, et al. One-year outcomes after retinal detachment surgery among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:338-45.
5. Halberstadt M, Brandenburg L, Sans N, et al. Analysis of risk factors for the outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2003;220:116-21. (Pubitemid 36402460)
6. Pastor JC, Fernández I, Rodríguez de la Rúa E, et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: the Retina 1 Projectereport 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:378-82.
7. Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM, et al. National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. I. Sample and methods. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:766-70. (Pubitemid 35460556)
8. Wickham L, Bunce C, Wong D, et al. Retinal detachment repair by vitrectomy: simplified formulae to estimate the risk of failure. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:1239-44.
9. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Yorston D, et al. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Scotland: research design and methodology. BMC Ophthalmol 2009;9:2.
10. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Yorston D, et al. The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: a two-year prospective population-based study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:4963-8.
11. Goezinne F, La Heij EC, Berendschot TT, et al. Incidence of redetachment 6 months after scleral buckling surgery. Acta Ophthalmol 2010;88:199-206.
12. Mansouri A, Almony A, Shah GK, et al. Recurrent retinal detachment: does initial treatment matter? Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:1344-7.
13. Mitry D, Singh J, Yorston D, et al. The predisposing pathology and clinical characteristics in the Scottish Retinal Detachment Study. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1429-34.
14. Sullivan PM, Luff AJ, Aylward GW. Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye (Lond) 1997;11:869-71. (Pubitemid 28024959)
15. Thompson JA, Snead MP, Billington BM, et al. National audit of the outcome of primary surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. II. Clinical outcomes. Eye (Lond) 2002;16:771-7. (Pubitemid 35460557)
16. Minihan M, Tanner V, Williamson TH. Primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: 20 years of change. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:546-8. (Pubitemid 32397827)
17. Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Majid MA, et al. Trends in vitreoretinal surgery at a tertiary referral centre: 1987 to 1996. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:396-8. (Pubitemid 29161177)
18. Laidlaw DA, Clark B, Grey RH, et al. Results of primary retinal detachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye (Lond) 1998;12:751.
19. Comer MB, Newman DK, George ND, et al. Who should manage primary retinal detachments? Eye (Lond) 2000;14:572-8.
20. Scott JD, Puvanachandra N, Snead MP. Retinal detachment surgery audit. Is it failure or success? Eye (Lond) 2005;19:710-11. (Pubitemid 40895500)
21. Kennedy CJ, Parker CE, McAllister IL. Retinal detachment caused by retinal dialysis. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25:25-30. (Pubitemid 27219745)
22. Ahmadieh H, Entezari M, Soheilian M, et al. Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling. Eur J Ophthalmol 2000;10:153-9. (Pubitemid 30439116)