Factors influencing anatomic and visual results in primary scleral buckling

European Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 153-159

  Ahmadieh, Hamid ^a   Entezari, M ^a   Soheilian, M ^a   Azarmina, M ^a   Dehghan, M H ^a   Mashayekhi, A ^a   Sajjadi, H ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

Prognostic factors; Retinal detachment; Scleral buckling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCLERA BUCKLING PROCEDURE; VISUAL ACUITY; VITREORETINOPATHY;

EID: 0033917236     PISSN: 11206721     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112067210001000211     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Chignell AH, Fison LG, Davies EWG, Hartley RE, Gundry MF. Failure in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57: 525-30.
2. Rachal WF, Burton TC. Changing concepts of failure after retinal reattachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97: 480-3.
3. Bonnet M. Clinical factors predisposing to massive proliferative vitreoretinopathy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 1984; 188: 148-52.
4. Malbran E, Dodds RA, Hulsbus R, Charles DE, Buonsanti JL, Androgue E. Retinal break type and proliferative vitreoretinopathy in nontraumatic retinal detachment. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990; 228: 423-5.
5. Yoshino Y, Ideta H, Nagasaki H, Uemura A. Comparative study of clinical factors oredisposing patients to proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina 1989; 9: 97-100.
6. Girizzard WS, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D. A multivariate analysis of the anatomic success of retinal detachment treated with scierai buckling. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994; 232: 1-7.
7. Sharma T, Challa JK, Ravishankar KV, Murugesan R. Scierai buckling for retinal detachment. Predictors for anatomic failure. Retina 1994; 14: 338-43.
8. Girard P, Mimoun G, Karpouzas I, Montefiore G. Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery. Retina 1994; 14: 417-24.
9. Greven CM, Sanders RJ, Brown GC, et al. Pseudophakic retinal detachments. Anatomic and visual results. Ophthalmology 1992; 99: 257-62.
10. Koerner F, Merz E, Wagner A, Gloor B. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Correlation with extent of retinal detachment, size of retinal break, and area of coagulation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1988; 192: 465-7.
11. Bonnet M. The development of severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy after retinal detachment surgery, grade B: A determining risk factor. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988; 226: 201-205.
12. Cowley M, Conway BP, Campochiaro PA, Kaiser D, Gaskin H. Clinical risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 1147-51.
13. Nagasaki H, Ideta H, Uemura A, Morita H, Ito K, Yonemoto J. Comparative study of clinical factors that predispose patients to proliferative vitreoretinopathy in aphakia. Retina 1991; 11: 204-7.
14. The Retina Society Terminology Committee. The classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1983; 90: 121-5.
15. Girard P, Karpouzas I. Visual acuity after scierai buckling surgery. Ophthalmologica 1995; 209: 302-8.