Retinal detachment surgery audit. Is it failure or success? [15]

Eye

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 710-711

  Scott, John D ^a   Puvanachandra, N ^a   Snead, M P ^a  

^a ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; EXPERIENCE; GENERAL HOSPITAL; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; RETINA DETACHMENT; RETINA DETACHMENT SURGERY; SCLERA BUCKLING PROCEDURE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VITRECTOMY;

EID: 21244457957     PISSN: 0950222X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701608     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Dinakaran S, Desai SP, Kolli LR, Noble PI, Kayarkar W. Eye 2003; 17: 547-548 (letter).
2. Sullivan PM, Luff Al, Aylward GW. Results of primary retinal reattachment surgery: a prospective audit. Eye 1997; 11: 869-871.
3. Chignell AH, Fison LG, Davies EWG, Hartley RE, Gundry MF. Failure in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57: 525-530.
4. Snead MP, Scott JD. Results in primary retinal reattachment surgery. Eye 1998; 12: 750 (letter).
5. Comer MB, Newman DK, George ND, Martin KR, Tom BD, Moore AT. Who should manage primary retinal detachments? Eye 2000; 14: 572-578.
6. Puvanachandra N, Addison PJK, Poulson AV, Goldsmith C, Chaterjee M, Scott JD et al. High volume one-stop ophthalmic surgery: implications for training on completion of a third audit loop (poster/presentation). Oxford Ophthalmological Congress 2003, in submission.