Fundus perimetry in functional diagnostics of glaucoma: Applicable in the practice?;Fundusperimetrie in der Glaukomdiagnostik: Schon praktisch anwendbar?

Ophthalmologe

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 345-350

  Rohrschneider, K ^a   Issa, P C ^b   Springer, C ^a,c   Scheuerle, A F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Trimli Spital   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Early diagnosis; Fundus perimetry; Glaucoma; Nerve fibre defect; Perimetry; SLO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PERIMETRY; VISUAL DISORDER;

GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

EID: 84860170975     PISSN: 0941293X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2545-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Andersen MVN (1996) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry compared with octopus in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 74: 135-139.
2. Bach M, Erb C (2012) Welche Bedeutungen haben Flimmer-Kontrasttests in der funktionellen Glaukom-Diagnostik? Ophthalmologe 109 (im Druck).
3. Brusini P, Di Giorgio G, Midena E et al (1995) Static automated perimetry and scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry in the assessment of functional damage in operating microscope light retinopathy. In: Mills RP, Wall M (Hrsg) Perimetry update 1994/95 Proceedings of the XIth international perimetric society meeting Washington DC, USA, July 3-7, 1994. Kugler, Amsterdam, S 171-175.
4. Convento E, Midena E, Dorigo MT et al (2006) Peripapillary fundus perimetry in eyes with glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 90: 1398-1403.
5. European Glaucoma Society (2008) Terminologie und Handlungsrichtlinien für die Glaukome, 3. Aufl. Dogma, Savona.
6. Greve EL (1973) Single and multiple stimulus static perimetry in glaucoma: the two phases of visual field examination. Doc Ophthalmol 36: 57-59.
7. Hood DC, Raza AS, Moraes CG de et al (2011) Initial arcuate defects within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52: 940-946.
8. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Fernandez MC (1991) Correlation of the blind spot size to the area of the optic disk and parapapillary atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol 111: 559-565.
9. Lima VC, Prata TS, De Moraes CG et al (2010) A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects. Br J Ophthalmol 94: 64-67.
10. Miglior S (2002) Microperimetry and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 236: 19.
11. Miglior S, Rossetti L, Lonati C et al (1995) Reproducibility of optic disc morphometry by dynamic scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 970.
12. Okada K, Watanabe W, Koike I et al (2003) Alternative method of evaluating visual field deterioration in very advanced glaucomatous eye by microperimetry. Jpn J Ophthalmol 47: 178-181.
13. Okubo K, Mizokami K (1985) Fundus perimetry and octopus perimetry for the evaluation of nerve fiber layer defects. In: Heijl A, Greve EL (Hrsg) Proceedings of the 6th international visual field symposium, Dr. W Junk. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, S 457-466.
14. Orzalesi N, Miglior S, Lonati C, Rosetti L (1998) Microperimetry of localized retinal nerve fiber layer defects. Vision Res 38: 763-771.
15. Panta G, Uva MG, Reibaldi A (1995) Pericecal sensitivity studied by means of scanning laser ophthalmoscope. In: Mills RP, Wall M (Hrsg) Perimetry update 1994/95 Proceedings of the 11 international perimetric society meeting. Kugler, Amsterdam, S 167-170.
16. Rohrschneider K, Becker M, Schumacher N et al (1998) Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Am J Ophthalmol 126: 52-58.
17. Rohrschneider K, Bültmann S, Springer C (2008) Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res 27: 536-548.
18. Rohrschneider K, Fendrich T, Becker M et al (1995) Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 233: 743-749.
19. Rohrschneider K, Glück R, Kruse FE et al (1999) Automatic static fundus perimetry for precise detection of early glaucomatous function loss. In: Wall M, Wild J (Hrsg) Perimetry update 1998/1999 Proceedings of the XIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting Gardone Riviera, Italy, September 6-9 1998. Kugler, Amsterdam, S 453-462.
20. Rohrschneider K, Kruse FE, Burk ROW, Völcker HE (1995) Darstellungsmöglichkeiten der retinalen Nervenfaserschicht mit dem Scanning Laser Ophthalmoskop. Ophthalmologe 92: 515-520.
21. Rohrschneider K, Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE (2005) Microperimetry - comparison between the Micro Perimeter 1 and Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope - fundus perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol 139: 125-134.
22. Sato S, Hirooka K, Baba T et al (2008) Correlation between retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and retinal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol 86: 609-613.
23. Schiefer U, Flad M, Stumpp F et al (2003) Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination. Arch Ophthalmol 121: 458-465.
24. Schiefer U, Papageorgiou E, Sample PA et al (2010) Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51: 5685-5689.
25. Schiefer U, Stercken-Sorrenti G, Dietrich TJ et al (1996) Fundus-orientierte Perimetrie, Evaluation eines neuen Gesichtsfeld-Untersuchungsverfahrens bezüglich der Detektion von Angioskotomen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 209: 62-71.
26. Springer C, Bültmann S, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K (2005) Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals. Comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 112: 848-854.
27. Springer C, Völcker HE, Rohrschneider K (2006) Statische Fundusperimetrie bei Probanden - Microperimeter 1 versus SLO. Ophthalmologe 103: 214-220.
28. Stürmer J, Schrödel C, Rappl W (1991) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope for static fundus perimetry in glaucomatous nerve-fiber bundle defects. In: Mills RP, Heijl A (Hrsg) Perimetry update, 1990/91. Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam Milano, S 85-92.
29. Sunness JS, Schuchard RA, Shan N et al (1995) Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 36: 1863-1874.
30. Töteberg-Harms M, Hirn C, Funk J (2011) Empfehlungen notwendiger Kontrolluntersuchungen bei okulärer Hypertension. Ophthalmologe 108: 1016-1022.