Normal values for fundus perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 52-58

  Rohrschneider, Klaus ^a   Becker, Matthias ^a   Schumacher, Nicole ^a   Fendrich, Thomas ^a   Völcker, Hans E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL VALUE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SCANNING LASER OPHTHALMOSCOPY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; LASERS; LIGHT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPHTHALMOSCOPES; PERIMETRY; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0031872605     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00065-8     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Stürmer J., Schrödel C., Rappl W. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope for static fundus controlled perimetry. Nasemann J.E., Burk R.O.W. Scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and tomography. 1990;133-146 Quintessenz, Munich.
2. Acosta F., Lashkari K., Reynaud X., Jalkh A.E., Van de Velde F., Chedid N. Characterization of functional changes in macular holes and cysts. Ophthalmology. 98:1991;1820-1823.
3. Van de Velde F.J., Jalkh A.E., Elsner A.E. Microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Mills R.P., Heijl A. Perimetry update, 1990/91. 1991;93-101 Kugler & Ghedini, Amsterdam.
4. Sjaarda R.N., Frank D.A., Glaser B.M., Thompson J.T., Murphy R.P. Assessment of vision in idiopathic macular holes with macular microperimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 100:1993;1513-1518.
5. Fletcher D.C., Schuchard R.A., Livingstone C.L., Crane W.G., Hu S.Y. Scanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry and applications for low vision rehabilitation clinicians. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America. 7:1994;257-265.
6. Rohrschneider K., Becker M., Fendrich T., Völcker H.E. Kinetische funduskontrollierte Perimetrie mit dem Scanning-Laser-Ophthalmoskop. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 207:1995;102-110.
7. Rohrschneider K., Fendrich T., Becker M., Krastel H., Kruse F.E., Völcker H.E. Static fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope with an automated threshold strategy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 233:1995;743-749.
8. Sunness J.S., Schuchard R.A., Shan N., Rubin G.S., Dagnelie G., Haselwood D.M. Landmark-driven fundus perimetry using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 36:1995;1863-1874.
9. Drance S.M., Berry V., Hughes A. Studies on the effects of age on the central and peripheral isopters of the visual field in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 63:1967;1667-1672.
10. Haas A., Flammer J., Schneider U. Influence of age on the visual fields of normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 101:1986;199-203.
11. Heijl A., Lindgren G., Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 105:1987;1544-1549.
12. Johnson C.A., Adams A.J., Lewis R.A. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 30:1989;2056-2064.
13. Haas A.L. Normalwerte für den Octopus und ihre Bedeutung bei der Befundinterpretation. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 194:1989;320-321.
14. Rohrschneider K., Becker M., Kruse F.E., Fendrich T., Völcker H.E. Stability of fixation-results of fundus-controlled examination using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ger J Ophthalmol. 4:1995;197-202.
15. Haefliger I.O., Flammer J. Increase of the short-term fluctuation of the differential light threshold around a physiologic scotoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 107:1989;417-420.
16. Haefliger I.O., Flammer J. Fluctuation of the differential light threshold at the border of absolute scotomas comparison between glaucomatous visual field defects and blind spots . Ophthalmology. 98:1991;1529-1532.
17. Egge K. The visual field in normal subjects. Acta Ophthalmol. 169:(suppl):1984;1-64.
18. Brenton R.S., Phelps C.D. The normal visual field on the Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 193:1986;56-74.
19. Jaffe G.J., Alvarado J.A., Juster R.P. Age-related changes of the normal visual field. Arch Ophthalmol. 104:1986;1021-1025.
20. Hart W.M. Jr. The temporal responsiveness of vision. Hart W.M. Jr. Adler's physiology of the eye clinical application . 1992;548-578 Mosby, Baltimore.
21. Flammer J., Niesel P. Die Reproduzierbarkeit perimetrischer Untersuchungsergebnisse. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 184:1984;374-376.
22. Barlow H.B. Retinal noise and absolute threshold. J Opt Soc Am. 46:1956;634-639.
23. Koch P., Roulier A., Fankhauser F. Perimetry the information theoretical basis for its automation . Vision Res. 12:1972;1619-1630.
24. Katz J., Sommer A. Reliability indexes of automated visual fields. Arch Ophthalmol. 106:1988;1252-1254.
25. Flammer J., Drance S.M., Schulzer M. Covariates of the long-term fluctuation of the differential light threshold. Arch Ophthalmol. 102:1984;880-882.
26. Nelson-Quigg J.M., Twelker J.D., Johnson C.A. Response properties of normal observers and patients during automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 107:1989;1612-1615.
27. Katz J., Sommer A. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss the effect of patient reliability . Ophthalmology. 97:1990;1032-1037.
28. Rohrschneider K., Glück R., Becker M., et al. Scanning laser fundus perimetry before laser photocoagulation of well-defined choroidal neovascularisation. Br J Ophthalmol. 81:1997;568-573.
29. Young W.O., Stewart W.C., Hunt H., Crosswell H. Static threshold variability in the peripheral visual field in normal subjects. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 228:1990;454-457.