Reaching while walking: Reaching distance costs more than walking distance

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1100-1104

  Rosenbaum, David A ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; WALKING;

ADOLESCENT; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59049101150     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1100     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bryden, P. J., & Roy, E. A. (2006). Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 121-136.
2. Carnahan, H., McFadyen, B. J., Cockell, D. L., & Halverson, A. H. (1996). The combined control of locomotion and prehension. Neuroscience Research Communications, 19, 91-100.
3. Claxton, L. J., Keen, R., & McCarty, M. E. (2003). Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychological Science, 14, 354-356.
4. Cockell, D. L., Carnahan, H., & McFadyen, B. J. (1995). A preliminary analysis of the coordination of reaching, grasping, and walking. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 81, 515-519.
5. Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2004). Where objects are grasped reveals how grasps are planned: Generation and recall of motor plans. Experimental Brain Research, 157, 486-495.
6. Doyen, A.-L., & Carlier, M. (2002). Measuring handedness: A validation study of Bishop's reaching card test. Laterality, 7, 115-130.
7. Goodnow, J. J., & Levine, R. A. (1973). "The grammar of action": Sequence and syntax in children's copying. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 82-98.
8. Haggard, P. (1998). Planning of action sequences. Acta Psychologica, 99, 201-215.
9. Marteniuk, R. G., & Bertram, C. P. (2001). Contributions of gait and trunk movement to prehension: Perspectives from world- and body-centered coordinates. Motor Control, 5, 151-164.
10. Marteniuk, R. G., Leavitt, J. L., MacKenzie, C. L., & Athenes, S. (1990). Functional relationships between grasp and transport components in a prehension task. Human Movement Science, 9, 149-176.
11. Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97-113.
12. Rosenbaum, D. A., Cohen, R. G., Meulenbroek, R. G., & Vaughan, J. (2006). Plans for grasping objects. In M. Latash & F. Lestienne (Eds.), Motor control and learning over the lifespan (pp. 9-25). New York: Springer.
13. Rosenbaum, D. A., Halloran, E. S., & Cohen, R. G. (2006). Grasping movement plans. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 918-922.
14. Todorov, E. (2004). Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 907-915.
15. van der Wel, R. P., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Coordination of locomotion and prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 281-287.
16. Weigelt, M., Cohen, R. G., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2007). Returning home: Locations rather than movements are recalled in human object manipulation. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 191-198.
17. Weir, P. L., MacDonald, J. R., Mallat, B. J., Leavitt, J. L., & oy, E. A. (1998). Age-related differences in prehension: The influence of task goals. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 79-89.