Probing modifications of cortical excitability during stroke recovery with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 182-192

  Lioumis, Pantelis ^a   Mustanoja, Satu ^a   Bikmullina, Rozaliya ^a   Vitikainen, Anne Mari ^a,b   Kičić, Dubravko ^c,d   Salonen, Oili ^a   Tatlisumak, Turgut ^a   Kaste, Markku ^a   Forss, Nina ^a,d   Mäkelä, Jyrki P ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c Elekta Oy   (Finland)

^d AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

intracortical facilitation; ischemic stroke; neuro navigation; short interval intracortical inhibition; stroke recovery; TMS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; FACILITATION; FEMALE; HAND FUNCTION; HAND MUSCLE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; INTRACORTICAL FACILITATION; MALE; NERVE CELL EXCITABILITY; NEURONAVIGATION; SHORT INTERVAL INTRACORTICAL INHIBITION; STROKE; SYNAPTIC INHIBITION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL INHIBITION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84860110182     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1902-182     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Meyer BU. Introduction to diagnostic strategies of magnetic stimulation. In: Pascual-Leone A, Davey NJ, Rothwell JC, Wassermann EM, Puri BK, eds. Handbook of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. London: Arnold Publishers; 2002:177-184.
2. Ziemann U. Paired pulse techniques. In: Pascual- Leone A, Davey NJ, Rothwell JC, Wassermann EM, Puri BK, eds. Handbook of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. London: Arnold Publishers; 2002: 141-162.
3. Abbruzesse G, Trompetto C. Clinical and research methods for evaluating cortical excitability. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;19:307-321.
4. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, et al. Noninvasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:79-92.
5. Cicinelli P, Traversa R, Rossini PM. Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2-4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;105:438-450.
6. Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, et al. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:671-676.
7. Shimizu T, Hosaki A, Hino T, et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain. 2002;125:1896-1907.
8. Manganotti P, Acler M, Zanette GP, et al. Motor cortical disinhibition during early and late recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:396-403.
9. Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, et al. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:1909-1922.
10. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex.J Physiol. 1993;471:501-519.
11. Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Ridding MC. Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 1996;496:873-881.
12. Rossini PM, Calautti C, Pauri F, et al. Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol. 2003;2:493-502.
13. Bütefisch CM, Netz J, Wessling M, et al. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain. 2003;126:470-481.
14. Witte OW, Bidmon HJ, Schiene K, et al. Functional differentiation of multiple perilesional zones after focal cerebral ischemia [review]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:1149-1165.
15. Talelli P, Greenwood RJ, Rothwell. Arm function after stroke: neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117: 1641-1659.
16. Nardone R, Tezzon F. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits of cerebral cortex after ischaemic stroke: prognostic value of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;42:131-136.
17. Manganotti P, Patuzzo S, Cortese F, et al. Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:936-943.
18. Cicinelli P, Pasqualetti P, Zaccagnini M, et al. Interhemispheric asymmetries of motor cortex excitability in the postacute stroke stage: a pairedpulse transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Stroke. 2003;34:2653-2658.
19. Liepert J, Hamzei F, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1761-1763.
20. Bastings EP, Greenberg JP, Good DC. Hand motor recovery after stroke: a transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16:275-282.
21. Delvaux V, Alagona G, Gérard P, et al. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114:1217-1225.
22. Lioumis P, Kičić D, Savolainen P, et al. Reproducibility of TMS-evoked EEG responses. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:1387-1396.
23. Vitikainen AM, Lioumis P, Paetau R, et al. Combined use of non-invasive techniques for improved functional localization for a selected group of epilepsy surgery candidates. Neuroimage. 2009;45:342-348.
24. Jung NH, Delvendahl I, Kuhnke NG, et al. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation does not decrease the variability of motor-evoked potentials. Brain Stimul. 2010;3:87-94.
25. Varona JF, Bermejo F, Guerra JM, et al. Long-term prognosis of ischemic stroke in young adults. Study of 272 cases. J Neurol. 2004;251:1507-1514.
26. Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, et al. Infl uence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke. Ann Neurol. 2004;55:400-409.
27. Bütefisch CM, Wessling M, Netz J, et al. Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:4-21.
28. Acler M, Robol E, Fiaschi A, et al. A double blind placebo RCT to investigate the effects of serotonergic modulation on brain excitability and motor recovery in stroke patients. J Neurol. 2009;256:1152-1158.
29. Roiha K, Kirveskari E, Kaste M, et al. Reorganization of the primary somatosensory cortex during stroke recovery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:339-345.
30. Lyden P, Lu M, Jackson C, et al. Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. Stroke. 1999;30:2347-2354.
31. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:703-709.
32. Farrell B, Godwin J, Richards S, et al. The United Kingdom transient ischaemic attack (UK-TIA) aspirin trial: final results. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991;54:1044-1054.
33. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981; 4:483-492.
34. Wade DT. Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989;11:89-92.
35. Yousry TA, Schmid UD, Alkadhi H, et al. Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. Brain. 1997;120:141-157.
36. Baron JC, Cohen LG, Cramer SC, et al. Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;18: 260-267.
37. Sirtori V, Corbetta D, Moja L, et al. Constraintinduced movement therapy for upper extremities in patients with stroke. Stroke. 2009; 41: e57-e58.
38. Granert O, Peller M, Gaser C, et al. Manual activity shapes structure and function in contralateral human motor hand area. Neuroimage. 2011;54:32-41.
39. Rabadi MH. Review of the randomized clinical stroke rehabilitation trials in 2009 [review]. Med Sci Monit. 2011;17:25-43.
40. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Oliveri M, et al. Neurophysiological follow-up of motor cortical output in stroke patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:1695-1703.
41. Sommer M, Paulus W. TMS waveform and current direction. In: Wassermann EM, Epstein CM, Ziemann U, Walsch V, Paus T, Lisanby S, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation. New York: Oxford University Press Inc; 2008:7-12.
42. Säisänen L, Julkunen P, Niskanen E, et al. Shortand intermediate-interval cortical inhibition and facilitation assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;195:241-248.
43. Badawy RA, Tarletti R, Mula M, et al. The routine circular coil is reliable in paired-TMS studies. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:784-788.
44. Julkunen P, Säisänen L, Danner N, et al. Comparison of navigated and non-navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor cortex mapping, motor threshold and motor evoked potentials. Neuroimage. 2009;44:790-795.