“Snails are science”: Creating context for science inquiry and writing through process drama

Youth Theatre Journal

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 68-86

  Warner, Christine D ^a   Andersen, Christopher ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860069672     PISSN: 08929092     EISSN: 19484798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08929092.2004.10012565     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1996). Summary comparison of content between National Science Education Standards, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, and Science for All Americans. Washington. DC http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolintro.htm (http://www.project2061.org/tools/benchol/bolintro.htm)
2. Andersen, C. 2002. A model of student inquiry in science education Manuscript submitted for Publication
3. Andersen, C, Warner, C, Erchick, D, and Tyson, C., July 2000. “ Process drama and science inquiry ”. In Process drama and classroom inquiry Edited by:Andersen, C., July, Columbus, OH Symposium conducted at the Third International Drama in Education Research Institute
4. Atwell, N., 1998. In the middle:New understandings about writing, reading and learning, 2nd, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
5. Bateson, G., 1955. A theory of play and fantasy. Psychiatric Research Reports, 2:39–51.
6. Bogdan, R. C, and Biklen, S.D., 1982. Qualitative research for education:An introduction in theory and methods, Newton, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
7. Britton, J., 1970. Language and learning, Baltimore, MD:Penguin.
8. Brown, J., Collins, A., and Duguid, P., 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1):32–42.
9. Bruner, J., 1976. Beyond the information given:Studies in the psychology of knowing, New York:Norton.
10. Carroll, J., 1988. Taking initiative:The role of drama in pupil/teacher talk (Doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle Upon Tyne. 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49:016
11. Chapman, M. L., 1995. The socio-cognitive construction of written genres in first grade. Research in the Teaching of English, 29:164–192.
12. Christie, F., 1998. “ Science and apprenticeship:The pedagogic discourse ”. In Reading science:Critical and functional perspectives on discourse of science, Edited by:Martin, J. R., and Veel, R., 152–177. New York:Routledge.
13. Dewey, J., 1934, 1954. The school and society, Chicago:University of Chicago press.
14. Emigk, J., 1977. Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28:122–127.
15. Fox-Keller, E., 1983. A feeling for the organism:The life and work of Barbara McClintock, New York:Freeman.
16. Garcia-Mila, M., and Andersen, C., 2004. Developmental change in notetaking during scientific inquiry, Manuscript submitted for publication
17. Garner, R., 1992. Self-regulated learning strategy shifts and shared expertise:Reactions to Palinezar and KIerk. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25:226–229.
18. Gee, J. P., 1989. Literacy, discourse, and linguistics:Introduction. Journal of Education, 171:5–25.
19. Goffman, E., 1986. Frame analysis:An essay on the organization of experience, Boston:Northeastern University Press.
20. Halliday, M. A. K, and Martin, J. R., 1993. Writing science:Literacy and discursive power, Pittsburgh, PA:University of Pittsburg Press.
21. Heathcote, D., and Bolton, G. 1995. Drama for learning:Dorothy Heathcote's mantle of the expert approach to education, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
22. Johnson, L., and O'Neill, C., 1986. Dorothy Heathcote:Collected writings on education and drama, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
23. Kamberelis, G., 1999. Genre development and learning:Children writing stories. science reports and poems. Research in the Teaching of English, 33:403–460.
24. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A., and Andersen, C., 1995. Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60 (4. Serial No. 245)
25. Lave, J., 1988. Cognition in practice, New York:Cambridge University Press.
26. Lee, O., 1999. Equity implications based on the conceptions of science achievement in major reform documents. Review of Educational Research, 69:83–115.
27. Lemke, J. L., 1990. Talking science:Language, learning and values, Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
28. Martin, J. R., 1999. “ Mentoring semogenesis. “Genre-based literacy pedagogy ”. In Pedagogy and the shaping of consciousness, Edited by:Christie, F., 3–14. London:Cassell.
29. Martin, N., D'Arcy, P., Newton, B., and Parker, R., 1976. Writing and learning across the curriculum, 11–16. London:Ward Lock Educational.
30. Moffet, J., and Wagner, B. J., 1984. A student-centered language arts curriculum. K-13, Boston:Houghton-Mifflin.
31. Morgan, N., and Saxton, J., 1987. Teaching drama:A mind of many wonders, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
32. Neelands, J., 1990. Structuring drama work:A handbook of available forms in thearre and drama, Edited by:Goode, T., Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
33. O'Neill, C., 1995. Drama worlds, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
34. Perkins, D. N., 1986. “ Thinking frames:An integrated perspective on teaching cognitive skills ”. In Teaching thinking skills:Theory and practice, Edited by:Baron, J., and Sternberg, R. J., 1–61. New York:Free Press.
35. Piaget, J., 2001. Language and thought of the child, 2nd, New York:Routledge.
36. Renk, H., The work of Dorothy Heathcote and the new paradigm of constructivism. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Work and Influence of Dorothy Heathcote. Lancaster, England.
37. Rogers, T., and O'Neill, C., 1993. “ Creating multiple worlds:Drama and literary response ”. In Exploring texts:The role of discussion and writing in the teaching and learning of literature, Edited by:Newell, G., and Durst, R., Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
38. Rogoff, B., 1990. Apprenticeship in thinking:Cognitive development in social context, New York:Oxford University Press.
39. Rothery, J., 1989. “ Learning about language ”. In Language development:Learning language. learning culture, Edited by:Hasan, R., and Martin, J. R., 199–256. Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
40. Vygotsky, L., 1980. Mind in society:The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
41. Wagner, B. J., 1998. Educational drama and language arts:What the research shows, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
42. Warner, C. D., 1997. The edging in of engagement:The nature of engagement in process drama when used as a methodology to enhance young adult literature. Research in Drama Education, 2 (1):21–42.
43. Warner, C.D., in press. Drama as inquiry through framed expertise. Research in Drama Education
44. Warner, C. D., Erchick, D., and Andersen, C., in revision. On beyond word problems:Using inquiry-based framed expertise to create a context for integrating mathematics, Manuscript submitted for publication
45. Wilhelm, J., and Edmiston, B., 1998. Imagining to learn:Inquiry, ethics. and integration through drama, Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
46. Wollman-Bonilla, J., 2000. Teaching science writing to first graders:genre learning and recontextualization. Research in the Teaching of English, 35:35–65.
47. Wood, S. S., Bruner, J. S., and Ross, G., 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17:89–100.