Style by demonstration: Teaching interactive movement style to robots

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 41-50

  Young, James E ^a,b   Ishii, Kentaro ^b,c   Igarashi, Takeo ^b,c   Sharlin, Ehud ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Locomotion style; Programming by demon stration; Qualitative evaluation; Social human robot interaction; Style by demonstration; Tangible user interfaces

Indexed keywords

IN-SITU; PROOF OF CONCEPT; QUALITATIVE EVALUATIONS; ROBOTIC INTERFACE; TANGIBLE USER INTERFACES; TEACHING SKILLS; TECHNICAL TASKS;

DEMONSTRATIONS; MACHINE DESIGN; ROBOTS; USER INTERFACES;

ROBOT PROGRAMMING;

EID: 84860011668     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2166966.2166976     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. AMAYA, K., BRUDERLIN, A., AND CALVERT, T. Emotion from motion. In Proceedings of Graphics Inter-face 1996. GI '96, Toronto, Canada, May 22-24, 1996 (1996), Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, pp. 222-229.
2. BERGER, P. L., AND LUCKMANN, T. The social con-struction of reality: a treatsie in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books, 1966.
3. BLUMBERG, B. M., AND GALYEAN, T. A. Multi-level direction of autonomous creatures for real-time virtual environments. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '95 (1995), ACM, pp. 47-54.
4. BREAZEAL, C., AND SCASSELLATI, B. A context-dependent attention system for a social robot. In Proc. IJCAI '99 (Stockholm, Sweden, 1999), IJCAI Press, pp. 1146-1151.
5. BYERS, D., AND JENKINS, O. C. HRI caught on film 2: Hands-free human-robot interaction. In Proc. HRI '08 (NY, USA, 2008), C. Bartneck, Ed., ACM.
6. CHUEH, M., JOSHI, S., YEUNG, Y. L. A., AND LEI, K. P. Towards a mobile-robot following controller using be-havioral cues. In Proc. ICIT '06 (USA, 2006), IEEE, pp. 150-157.
7. DINERSTEIN, J., EGBERT, P. K., AND VENTURA, D. Learning policies for embodied virtual agents through demonstration. In Proc. IJCAI '07 (2007), IJCAI Press, pp. 1257-1262.
8. DONTCHEVA, M., YNGVE, G., AND POPOVIC, Z. Lay-ered acting for character animation. ÁCM Trans. Graph. 22, 3 (2003), 409-416.
9. DOURISH, P. Where the Action Is: The Foundation of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, MA, 2001.
10. FREI, P., SU, V., MIKHAK, B., AND ISHII, H. curlybot: designing a new class of computational toys. In Proc. CHI '00 (NY, USA, 2000), ACM, pp. 129-136.
11. GALLAHER, P. E. Individual differences in nonverbal behavior: Dimensions of style. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 1 (1992), 133-145.
12. GOCKLEY, R., FORLIZZI, J., AND SIMMONS, R. Natural person-following behavior for social robots. In Proc. HRI '07 (NY, USA, 2007), ACM, pp. 17-24.
13. GRIBOVSKAYA, E., AND BILLARD, A. D. Combining dynamical systems control and programming by demonstration for teaching discrete bimanual coordi-nation tasks to a humanoid robot. In Proc. HRI '08 (NY, 2008), ACM, pp. 33-40.
14. GUO, C., AND SHARLIN, E. Exploring the use of tangible user interfaces for human-robot interaction: a com-paritive study. In Proc. CHI '08 (2008), ACM, pp. 121-130.
15. GUO, C., YOUNG, J. E., AND SHARLIN, E. Touch and toys: new techniques for interaction with a remote group of robots. In Proc. CHI '09 (2009), pp. 491-500.
16. HALBERT, D. Programming by Example. PhD thesis, University of California Berkeley, 1984.
17. HEIDER, F., AND SIMMEL, M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American J. of Psychology 57 (1944), 243-259.
18. IGARASHI, T., MOSCOVICH, T., AND HUGHES, J. F. As-rigid-as-possible shape manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 24, 3 (2005), 1134-1141.
19. ISHII, H., AND ULLMER, B. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proc. CHI '97 (1997), ACM, pp. 234-241.
20. KANDA, T., KAMASIMA, M., IMAI, M., ONO, T., SAKAMOTO, D., ISHIGURO, H., AND ANZAI, Y. A hu-manoid robot that pretends to listen to route guidance from a human. Auton. Robots 22, 1 (2007), 87-100.
21. KASSIN, S. M. Heider and Simmel (1944) revisited: causal attribution and the animated film technique. Review of Personality and Social Psychology 3 (1982), 125-150.
22. LEE, J., AND LEE, K. H. Precomputing avatar behavior from human motion data. In Proc. SCA '04 (Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2004), Eurographics Association, pp. 79-87.
23. LIEM, M., VISSER, A., AND FROEN, G. A hybrid algo-rithm for tracking and following people using a robotic dog. In Proc. HRI '08 (2008), ACM, pp. 185-192.
24. LOCKERD, A., AND BREAZEAL, C. Tutelage and socially guided robot learning. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ IROS '04 (USA, 2004), vol. 4, IEEE, pp. 3475-3480.
25. MAULSBY, D. L., WITTEN, I. H., AND KITTLITZ, K. A. Metamouse: specifying graphical procedures by example. In Proc. SIGGRAPH '89 (NY, USA, 1989), ACM, pp. 127-136.
26. NORMAN, D. A. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, NY, 2004.
27. OTERO, N., ALISSANDRAKIS, A., DAUTENHAHN, K., NEHANIV, C., SYRDAL, D., AND KOAY, K. Human to robot demonstrations of routine home tasks: exploring the role of the robot's feedback. In Proc. HRI '08 (NY, 2008), ACM, pp. 177-184.
28. RAFFLE, H. S., PARKES, A. J., AND ISHII, H. Topobo: a constructive assembly system with kinetic memory. In Proc. CHI '04 (NY, USA, 2004), ACM, pp. 647-654.
29. SCHOLL, B. J., AND TREMOULET, P. D. Perceptual cau-sality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (TRENDS) 4, 8 (Aug. 2000), 299-309.
30. SHARLIN, E., WATSON, B., KITAMURA, Y., KISHINO, F., AND ITOH, Y. On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8, 5 (2004), 338-346.
31. STRAUSS, A., AND CORBIN, J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi, 1998.
32. THOMAS, F., AND JOHNSTON, O. The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation, first hyperion ed. ed. Disney Editions (Walt Disney Productions), 1981.
33. THOMAZ, A. L., AND BREAZEAL, C. Teachable robots: Understanding human teaching behavior to build more effective robot learners. Artificial Intelligence 172 (2008), 716-737.
34. TREMOULET, P. D., AND FELDMAN, J. Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object. Perception 29, 8 (May 2000), 943-951.
35. YAMAOKA, F., KANDA, T., ISHIGURO, H., AND HAGITA, N. How close?: model of proximity control for infor-mation-presenting robots. In Proc. HRI '08 (NY, USA, 2008), ACM, ACM, pp. 137-144.
36. YANCO, H. A., AND DRURY, J. L. Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2004. SMC '04, The Hague, The Netherlands, October 10-13, 2004 (Oct. 2004), vol. 3, IEEE, pp. 2841-2846.
37. YOUNG, J. E., HAWKINS, R., SHARLIN, E., AND IGARASHI, T. Toward acceptable domestic robots: Applying insights from social psychology. Inagural Issue of the Int. J. Social Robotics. January 2009 1, 1 (2009).
38. YOUNG, J. E., IGARASHI, T., AND SHARLIN, E. Puppet master: Designing reactive character behavior by demonstration. In ACM SIGGRAPH / EG SCA '08. (Germany, 2008), EG Press, EG Association, pp. 183-191.