Topic Model Analysis of Metaphor Frequency for Psycholinguistic Stimuli

NAACL HLT 2009 - Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 9-16

  Bethard, Steven ^a   Lai, Vicky Tzuyin ^b   Martin, James H ^c  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; STATISTICS;

LATENT DIRICHLET ALLOCATION; MODELING ANALYZES; TARGET WORDS; TOPIC MODELING; WORD FREQUENCIES;

FREQUENCY ESTIMATION;

EID: 84860008370     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Alias-i. 2008. LingPipe 3.7.0. http://aliasi.com/lingpipe/, October.
2. Yossi Arzouan, Abraham Goldstein, and Miriam Faust. 2007. Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research, 1160:69–81, July.
3. Julia Birke and Anoop Sarkar. 2006. A clustering approach for nearly unsupervised recognition of non-literal language. In European Chapter of the ACL (EACL).
4. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993–1022.
5. BNC. 2007. The british national corpus, version 3 (BNC XML edition). Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/.
6. Seana Coulson and Cyma Van Petten. 2002. Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6):958–68, September. PMID: 12450098.
7. Matt Gedigian, John Bryant, Srini Narayanan, and Branimir Ciric. 2006. Catching metaphors. In Workshop On Scalable Natural Language Understanding.
8. Galina Iakimova, Christine Passerieux, Jean-Paul Laurent, and Marie-Christine Hardy-Bayle. 2005. ERPs of metaphoric, literal, and incongruous semantic processing in schizophrenia. Psychophysiology, 42(4):380–390.
9. Thorsten Joachims, 1998. Text categorization with Support Vector Machines: Learning with many relevant features, pages 137–142. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
10. Thorsten Joachims. 2005. A support vector method for multivariate performance measures. In Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, pages 377–384, Bonn, Germany. ACM.
11. Saisuresh Krishnakumaran and Xiaojin Zhu. 2007. Hunting elusive metaphors using lexical resources. In Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language.
12. Vicky Tzuyin Lai, Tim Curran, and Lise Menn. 2007. The comprehension of conventional and novel metaphors: An ERP study. In 13th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, August.
13. George Lakoff. 1994. Conceptual metaphor WWW server. http://cogsci.berkeley.edu/lakoff/.
14. David D. Lewis, Yiming Yang, Tony G. Rose, and Fan Li. 2004. RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 5:361–397.
15. James H. Martin. 1994. MetaBank: a Knowledge-Base of metaphoric language conventions. Computational Intelligence, 10(2):134–149.
16. James H. Martin. 2006. A rational analysis of the context effect on metaphor processing. In Stefan Th. Gries and Anatol Stefanowitsch, editors, Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Mouton de Gruyter.
17. Howard R. Pollio, Michael K. Smith, and Marilyn R. Pollio. 1990. Figurative language and cognitive psychology. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5:141–167.
18. Tony Berber Sardinha. 2008. Metaphor probabilities in corpora. In Mara Sofia Zanotto, Lynne Cameron, and Marilda do Couto Cavalcanti, editors, Confronting Metaphor in Use, pages 127–147. John Benjamins.
19. Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2002. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 34(1):1–47.
20. Vivien C. Tartter, Hilary Gomes, Boris Dubrovsky, Sophie Molholm, and Rosemarie Vala Stewart. 2002. Novel metaphors appear anomalous at least momentarily: Evidence from N400. Brain and Language, 80(3):488–509, March.