A clustering approach for the nearly unsupervised recognition of nonliteral language

EACL 2006 - 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 329-336

  Birke, Julia ^a   Sarkar, Anoop ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLUSTERING APPROACH; CLUSTERING TECHNIQUES; CONSTRAINT VIOLATION; HUMAN SUPERVISION; MULTIPLE SEEDS; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SEMANTIC HIERARCHIES; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 82555190546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Srinivas Bangalore and Aravind K. Joshi. 1999. Supertagging: an approach to almost parsing. Comput. Linguist. 25, 2 (Jun. 1999), 237-265.
2. Julia Birke. 2005. A Clustering Approach for the Unsupervised Recognition of Nonliteral Language. M.Sc. Thesis. School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University.
3. Barbara Di Eugenio and Michael Glass. 2004. The kappa statistic: a second look. Comput. Linguist. 30, 1 (Mar. 2004), 95-101.
4. William B. Dolan. 1995. Metaphor as an emergent property of machine-readable dictionaries. In Proceedings of Representation and Acquisition of Lexical Knowledge: Polysemy, Ambiguity, and Generativity (March 1995, Stanford University, CA). AAAI 1995 Spring Symposium Series, 27-29.
5. Dan Fass. 1997. Processing metonymy and metaphor. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
6. Yael Karov and Shimon Edelman. 1998. Similarity-based word sense disambiguation. Comput. Linguist. 24, 1 (Mar. 1998), 41-59.
7. James H. Martin. 1990. A computational model of metaphor interpretation. Toronto, ON: Academic Press, Inc.
8. James H. Martin. 1992. Computer understanding of conventional metaphoric language. Cognitive Science 16, 2 (1992), 233-270.
9. Zachary J. Mason. 2004. CorMet: a computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Comput. Linguist. 30, 1 (Mar. 2004), 23-44.
10. Masaki Murata, Qing Ma, Atsumu Yamamoto, and Hitoshi Isahara. 2000. Metonymy interpretation using x no y examples. In Proceedings of SNLP2000 (Chiang Mai, Thailand, 10 May 2000).
11. Srini Narayanan. 1999. Moving right along: a computational model of metaphoric reasoning about events. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the 11th IAAI Conference (Orlando, US, 1999). 121-127.
12. Malvina Nissim and Katja Markert. 2003. Syntactic features and word similarity for supervised metonymy resolution. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-03) (Sapporo, Japan, 2003). 56-63.
13. Adwait Ratnaparkhi. 1996. A maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference (University of Pennsylvania, May 17-18 1996).
14. Sylvia W. Russell. 1976. Computer understanding of metaphorically used verbs. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Microfiche 44. Canada