The extended prosodic word

Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 135-194

  Ito, Junko ^a   Mester, Armin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551597966     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Alber, Birgit 1998 Stress preservation in German loan-words. In: Wolfgang Kehrein, and Richard Wiese (eds.), Phonology and Morphology of the Germanic Languages, 113-141. Tübingen, Germany: Niemeyer.
2. Bakovic, Eric 1999 Deletion, insertion, and symmetrical identity. Ms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. [ROA-300-0299].
3. Booij, Geert 1996 Cliticization as prosodic integration: The case of Dutch. The Linguistic Review 13: 219-242.
4. Borowsky, Toni 1993 On the word level. In: Sharon Hargus, and Ellen Kaisse (eds.), Phonetics and Phonology vol. 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology, 199-234. New York: Academic Press.
5. Chen, Matthew 1985 The syntax of phonology: Xiamen tone sandhi. Ms. University of California, San Diego.
6. Chen, Matthew 1987 The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology 4: 109-150. Cho, Taehong and Patricia A. Keating
7. Chen, Matthew 2001 Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29: 155-190.
8. Davis, Stuart 2005 Capitalistic v. militaristic: The paradigm uniformity effect reconsidered. In: Laura J. Downing, T. Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.), Paradigms in Phonological Theory, 107-121. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. 8.) Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
9. Duden 2005 Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Series Der Grosse Duden. Vol. 4. Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.
10. Flack, Kathryn 2006 Restrictions on the edges of prosodic domains. Ms. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
11. Fougeron, Cecile and Patricia Keating 1997 Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. JASA 101: 3728-3740.
12. Geilfuß-Wolfgang, Jochen 1998 Über die optimale Position von ge. Linguistische Berichte 176: 581-588.
13. Giegerich, Heinz 1985 Metrical Phonology and Phonological Structure. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
14. Goldsmith, John 2001 What is phonology? http://humanities.uchicago.edu/faculty/goldsmith/phono1/Flaps.html. Accessed May 11, 2007.
15. Gouskova, Maria 2003 Deriving economy: Syncope in optimality theory. Ph. D. diss., Dept. of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
16. Gutch, Donald 1992 Linking and Intrusive -r in English and Bavarian. In: Claudia Blank (ed.), Language and Civilization: A Concerted Profusion of Essays and Studies in Honour of Otto Hietsch, 555-611. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
17. Hall, Tracy Alan 1999 Phonotactics and the prosodic structure of German function words. In: Tracy Alan Hall, and Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word, 99-131. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.
18. Hall, Tracy Alan, and Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.) 1999 Studies on the Phonological Word. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Philadelphia, USA: John Benjamins.
19. Halliday, Michael A.K 1960 Categories of the theory of grammar. Word 17: 241-292.
20. Harden, Theo 2003 Die Tanzerei und das Gesinge. Einige Verdachtsmomente zur Ableitung pejorativer Nomina im Deutschen. Linguistic online 13. http://www.linguistik-online.com/1^01/harde^a.html.
21. Hayes, Bruce 1984 The prosodic hierarchy in meter. Ms. UCLA.
22. Hayes, Bruce 1989 The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In: Paul Kiparsky, and Gilbert Youmans (eds.), Rhythm and Meter, 201-260. Orlando: Academic Press.
23. Hayes, Bruce 1995 Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Hyde, Brett 2002 A restrictive theory of metrical stress. Phonology 19: 313-359.
25. Inkelas, Sharon 1989 Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Ph. D. diss., Stanford University. Published 1990, Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series. New York: Garland Press.
26. Ito, Junko and Armin Mester 1999 Realignment. In: Rene Kager, Harry van der Hulst, and Wim Zon-neveld (eds.), The Prosody-Morphology Interface, 188-217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Ito, Junko and Armin Mester 2003 Weak layering and word binarity. In: Takeru Honma, Masao Okazaki, Toshiyuki Tabata, and Shin-ichi Tanaka (eds.), A New Century of Phonology and Phonological Theory. A Festschrift for Professor Sho-suke Haraguchi on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, 26-65. Tokyo: Kaitakusha. [Reprint of: 1992. Weak layering and word bi-narity. Santa Cruz, CA: UC Santa Cruz. LRC Working Paper 92-9.]
28. Ito, Junko and Armin Mester 2007a Adjunction in prosodic phonology. Talk presented at OCP4, Rhodes, Greece, January 2007.
29. Ito, Junko and Armin Mester 2007b Prosodic adjunction in Japanese compounds. In: Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 4,97-111. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 55. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy. to appear The onset of the prosodic word. In: Steve Parker (ed.), Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation. London: Equinox.
30. Jurafsky, Daniel, Alan Bell, Michelle Gregory and William D. Raymond 2000 Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In: Joan Bybee, and Paul Hopper (eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 229-254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Kabak, Bariş and Rene Schiering 2006 The phonology and morphology of function word contractions in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 9: 53-99.
32. Kahn, Daniel 1976 Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. Ph. D. diss., MIT. Published by Garland Press, New York, 1980.
33. Kiparsky, Paul 1966 Über den deutschen Akzent. Studia Grammatica 7: 69-97. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
34. Kleinhenz, Ursula 1996 The prosody of German clitics. Papers on Clitics: ZASPIL Vol. 6: 81-95. Potsdam, Germany.
35. Kubozono, Haruo 1995 Gokeisei to On-in-kouzou [Word Formation and Phonological Structure]. Tokyo: Kurosio.
36. Ladd, D. Robert 1986 Intonational phrasing: The case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology 3: 311-340.
37. Ladd, D. Robert 1996 Intonational Phonology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. McCarthy, John J 1991 Synchronic rule inversion. In: Laurel Sutton, Christopher Johnson, and Ruth Shields (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting ofthe Berkeley Linguistics Society, 192-207.
39. McCarthy, John J 1993 A case of surface constraint violation. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 38: 127-153.
40. McCarthy, John J., and Alan S. Prince 1993a Generalized alignment. In: Geert Booij, and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology, 79-153.
41. McCarthy, John J., and Alan S. Prince 1993b Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Ms.: University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University.
42. McMahon, April M. S. 2000 Change, chance, and optimality. Oxford linguistics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Meinschaefer, Judith 2005 The prosodic domain of Italian troncamento is not the Clitic Group. Ms. Konstanz, Germany: Universitat Konstanz. http://www.ub.uni-konstanz.de/kops/volltexte/2005/1584/.
44. Neef, Martin 1996 Wortdesign. Eine deklarative Analyse der deutschen Verbflexion.Tu-bingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
45. Nespor, Marina 1990 Vowel deletion in Italian. The organization of the phonological component. The Linguistic Review 7: 375-398.
46. Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel 1983 Prosodic structure above the word. In: Anne Cutler, and D. Robert Ladd (eds.), Prosody: Models and Measurements, 123-140. Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork, Tokyo: Springer.
47. Nespor, Marina, and Irene Vogel 1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
48. Oostendorp, Marc van 2002 The phonological and morphological status of the prosodic word adjunct. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 11: 209-236.
49. Ortmann, Albert 1998 Consonant epenthesis: Its distribution and phonological specification. In: Wolfgang Kehrein, and Richard Wiese (eds.), Phonology and Morphology of Germanic Languages, 51-75. Tuebingen: Niemeyer.
50. Pater, Joe 2000 Nonuniformity in English secondary stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17: 237-274.
51. Peperkamp, Sharon 1996 On the prosodic representation of clitics. In: Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), Interfaces in Phonology, 102-127. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
52. Peperkamp, Sharon 1997 Prosodic Words. Ph. D. diss., UniversiteitvanAmsterdam. DenHaag: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics.
53. Pierrehumbert, Janet and Mary Beckman 1988 Japanese Tone Structure. LI Monograph Series No. 15. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54. Pike, Kenneth 1967 Tongue root position in practical phonetics. Phonetica 17: 129-140.
55. Prince, Alan 1980 A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 511-562.
56. Prince, Alan 1983 Relating to the grid. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 19-100.
57. Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky 2004 Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Mal-den, Mass.: Blackwell. [Reprint of: 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Brunswick, New Jersey, and Boulder, Colorado: Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder. Technical report RuCCS-TR-2]
58. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1981 On the nature of phonological representation. In: John Anderson, John Laver, and Terry Myers (eds.), The Cognitive Representation ofSpeech, 379-388. Amsterdam: North Holland.
59. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1984 Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1986 On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology 3: 371-405.
61. Selkirk, Elisabeth 1996 The prosodic structure of function words. In: James L. Morgan, and Katherine Demuth (eds.), Signal to Syntax, 187-213. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62. Selkirk, Elisabeth 2000 The interaction of constraints on prosodic phrasing. In: Merle Home (ed.), Prosody, theory and experiment: Studies presented to Gosta Bruce, 231-261. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: KluwerAcademic Publishers.
63. Selkirk, Elisabeth and T. Shen 1990 Prosodic domains in Shanghai Chinese. In: Sharon Inkelas, and Draga Zec (eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection, 313-337. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Selkirk, Elisabeth and Koichi Tateishi 1988 Constraints on minor phrase formation in Japanese. Papers from the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 316-336. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
65. Smith, Jennifer L. 2004 Making constraints positional: Toward a compositional model of CON. Lingua 114: 1433-1464.
66. Steriade, Donca 2000 Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In: Michael B. Broe, and Janet B. Pierrehumbert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon, 313-334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1995 Phonological phrases: Their relation to syntax, focus, and prominence. Ph. D. diss., Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
68. Truckenbrodt, Hubert 1999 On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219-255.
69. Vigario, Marina 1999 On the prosodic status of stressless function words in European Portuguese. In: Tracy Alan Hall, and Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the Phonological Word, 255-294. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
70. Wagner, Michael 2005 Prosody and recursion. Ph. D. diss., Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.
71. Wall, Robert 1972 Introduction to Mathematical Linguistics. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, INC.
72. Wells, JohnC. 1982 Accents of English. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
73. Wiese, Richard 1996. The Phonology of German. The Phonology of the World's Languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.