Dependence of corneal stem/progenitor cells on ocular surface innervation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 867-872

  Ueno, Hiroki ^a,b   Ferrari, Giulio ^c   Hattori, Takaaki ^a,b   Saban, Daniel R ^a,b   Katikireddy, Kishore R ^a,b   Chauhan, Sunil K ^a,b   Dana, Reza ^a,b  

^a SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c IRCCS FONDAZIONE BIETTI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA TUBULIN; BREAST CANCER RESISTANCE PROTEIN; NERVE CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; PROTEIN P63; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR HES 1; ABC TRANSPORTER; ABCG2 PROTEIN, MOUSE; BASIC HELIX LOOP HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; HELIX LOOP HELIX PROTEIN; HES1 PROTEIN, MOUSE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; MESSENGER RNA; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; TRANSACTIVATOR PROTEIN; TRP63 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLONY FORMING UNIT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; ELECTROCOAGULATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; EYELID REFLEX; FLOW CYTOMETRY; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; INNERVATION; KERATOPATHY; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SENSORY NERVE; STEM CELL; TRIGEMINAL NERVE; ANIMAL; BIOSYNTHESIS; C57BL MOUSE; CELL SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; DENERVATION; DISEASE MODEL; ELECTROLYSIS; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; TRIGEMINAL NERVE INJURY; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE;

ANIMALS; ATP-BINDING CASSETTE TRANSPORTERS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CELL SURVIVAL; CORNEA; CORNEAL DISEASES; DENERVATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ELECTROLYSIS; EPITHELIUM, CORNEAL; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENES, TUMOR SUPPRESSOR; HELIX-LOOP-HELIX MOTIFS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, MESSENGER; STEM CELLS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE INJURIES;

EID: 84859962783     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8438     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Kinoshita S, Friend J, Thoft RA. Sex chromatin of donor corneal epithelium in rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;21:434-441.
2. Buck RC. Measurement of centripetal migration of normal corneal epithelial cells in the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26: 1296-1299.
3. Schermer A, Galvin S, Sun TT. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J Cell Biol. 1986;103:49-62.
4. Cotsarelis G, Cheng SZ, Dong G, Sun TT, Lavker RM. Existence of slow cycling limbal epithelial basal cells that can be preferentially stimulated to proliferate: implications on epithelial stem cells. Cell. 1989;57:201-209.
5. Kruse FE. Stem cells and corneal epithelial regeneration. Eye. 1994;8:170-183.
6. Beebe DC, Masters BR. Cell lineage and the differentiation of corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:1815-1825.
7. Nagasaki T, Zhao J. Centripetal migration of corneal epithelial cells in the normal adult mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44: 558-566.
8. Stepp MA, Zieske JD. The corneal epithelial stem cell niche. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:15-26.
9. Davies SB, Chui J, Madigan MC, et al. Stem cell activity in the developing human cornea. Stem Cells. 2009;27:2781-2792.
10. Majo F, Rochat A, Nicolas M, Jaoudé GA, Barrandon Y. Oligopotent stem cells are distributed throughout the mammalian ocular surface. Nature. 2008 13;456:250-254.
11. Budak MT, Alpdogan OS, Zhou M, et al. Ocular surface epithelia contain ABCG2-dependent side population cells exhibiting features associated with stem cells. J Cell Sci. 2005;118:1715-1724.
12. Goodell MA, Rosenzweig M, Kim H, et al. Dye efflux studies suggest that hematopoietic stem cells expressing low or undetectable levels of CD34 antigen exist in multiple species. Nat Med. 1997;3:1337-1345.
13. Storms RW, Goodell MA, Fisher A, Mulligan RC, Smith C. Hoechst dye efflux reveals a novel CD7(+)CD34(-) lymphoid progenitor in human umbilical cord blood. Blood. 2000;96:2125-2133.
14. Watanabe K, Nishida K, Yamato M, et al. Human limbal epithelium contains side population cells expressing the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2. FEBS Lett. 2004;565:6-10.
15. Umemoto T, Yamato M, Nishida K, et al. Rat limbal epithelial side population cells exhibit a distinct expression of stem cell markers that are lacking in side population cells from the central cornea. FEBS Lett. 2005;579:6569-6574.
16. Umemoto T, Yamato M, Nishida K, et al. Limbal epithelial sidepopulation cells have stem cell-like properties, including quiescent state. Stem Cells. 2006;24:86-94.
17. Krulova M, Pokorna K, Lencova A, et al. A rapid separation of two distinct populations of mouse corneal epithelial cells with limbal stem cell characteristics by centrifugation on percoll gradient. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3903-3908.
18. Nishida T. Neurotrophic mediators and corneal wound healing. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:194-202.
19. Goins KM. New insights into the diagnosis and treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy. Ocul Surf. 2005;3:96-110.
20. Li W, Hayashida Y, Chen YT, Tseng SC. Niche regulation of corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus. Cell Res. 2007;17:26-36.
21. Touhami A, Grueterich M, Tseng SC. The role of NGF signaling in human limbal epithelium expanded by amniotic membrane culture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:987-994.
22. Qi H, Chuang EY, Yoon KC, et al. Patterned expression of neurotrophic factors and receptors in human limbal and corneal regions. Mol Vis. 2007;13:1934-1941.
23. Qi H, Li DQ, Shine HD, et al. Nerve growth factor and its receptor TrkA serve as potential markers for human corneal epithelial progenitor cells. Exp Eye Res. 2008;86:34-40.
24. Meyer-Blazejewska EA, Kruse FE, Bitterer K, et al. Preservation of the limbal stem cell phenotype by appropriate culture techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:765-774.
25. Ferrari G, Chauhan SK, Ueno H, et al. A novel mouse model for neurotrophic keratopathy: trigeminal nerve stereotactic electrolysis through the brain. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:2532-2539.
26. Chang CY, Green CR, McGhee CN, et al. Acute wound healing in the human central corneal epithelium appears to be independent of limbal stem cell influence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49: 5279-5286.
27. Kawasaki S, Tanioka H, Yamasaki K, et al. Expression and tissue distribution of p63 isoforms in human ocular surface epithelia. Exp Eye Res. 2006;82:293-299.
28. Nakamura T, Ohtsuka T, Sekiyama E, et al. Hes1 regulates corneal development and the function of corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells. 2008;26:1265-1274.
29. Morishige N, Komatsubara T, Chikama T, Nishida T. Direct observation of corneal nerve fibres in neurotrophic keratopathy by confocal biomicroscopy. Lancet. 1999;354:1613-1614.
30. Chikama T, Fukuda K, Morishige N, Nishida T. Treatment of neurotrophic keratopathy with substance-P-derived peptide (FGLM) and insulin-like growth factor I. Lancet. 1998;351:1783-1784.
31. Nishida T, Chikama T, Morishige N, et al. Persistent epithelial defects due to neurotrophic keratopathy treated with a substance p-derived peptide and insulin-like growth factor 1. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2007;51:442-447.
32. Araki-Sasaki K, Aizawa S, Hiramoto M, et al. Substance P-induced cadherin expression and its signal transduction in a cloned human corneal epithelial cell line. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182:189-195.
33. Solomon A, Meller D, Prabhasawat P, et al. Amniotic membrane grafts for nontraumatic corneal perforations, descemetoceles, and deep ulcers. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:694-703.
34. Chen HJ, Pires RT, Tseng SC. Amniotic membrane transplantation for severe neurotrophic corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84: 826-833.
35. Coassin M, Lambiase A, Micera A, et al. Nerve growth factor modulates in vitro the expression and release of TGF-beta1 by amniotic membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006; 244:485-491.
36. Park KS, Lim CH, Min BM, et al. The side population cells in the rabbit limbus sensitively increased in response to the central cornea wounding. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:892-900.
37. Yoshida S, Shimmura S, Nagoshi N, et al. Isolation of multipotent neural crest-derived stem cells from the adult mouse cornea. Stem Cells. 2006;24:2714-2722.
38. Kang L, Chen Q, Wang L, et al. Decreased mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells contributes to impaired neovascularization in diabetes. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2009;36:47-56.
39. Zänker KS. The neuro-neoplastic synapse: does it exist? Prog Exp Tumor Res. 2007;39:154-161.
40. De Cillà S, Ranno S, Carini E, et al. Corneal subbasal nerves changes in patients with diabetic retinopathy: an in vivo confocal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:5155-5158.
41. Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, et al. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2915-2921.
42. Hyndiuk RA, Kazarian EL, Schultz RO, Seideman S. Neurotrophic corneal ulcers in diabetes mellitus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95: 2193-2196.
43. Lockwood A, Hope-Ross M, Chell P. Neurotrophic keratopathy and diabetes mellitus. Eye. 2006;20:837-839.