Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: An example of disruptive innovation effect?

Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 136, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 447-453

  Eltoum, Isam A ^a   Alston, Evans A ^a   Roberson, Janie ^a  

^a University of Alabama at Birmingham   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; ECONOMICS; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; CYTODIAGNOSIS; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; PANCREAS; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84859951529     PISSN: 00039985     EISSN: 15432165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0218-OA     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. College of American Pathologists. Transforming pathology: information as a disruptive technology. Futurescape of Pathology Series III; Jun 12-14, 2009; Rosemont, IL. http://www.cap.org/apps/docs/futurescape/ast-conferences.html.
2. Hwang J. Keynote address-the innovator's prescription: an examination of the future of health care through the lenses of disruptive innovation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009;133(4):513-520.
3. Christensen CM. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.
4. Christensen CM. The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. J Prod Innov Manag. 2006;23(1):39-55.
5. Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(5):102-112, 199.
6. Christensen CM, Horn MB, Caldra L, Soares L. Disrupting college: how disruptive innovation can deliver quality and affordability to postsecondary education. Center for American Progress Web site. http://www.americanprogress. org/issues/2011/02/disrupting-college.html. Published February 8, 2011. Accessed July 14, 2011.
7. Christensen CM, Raynor ME. The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003.
8. Yu D, Hang C-C. A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. Int J Manag Rev. 2010;12:435-452.
9. Danneels E. Disruptive technology reconsidered: a critique and research agenda. J Prod Innov Manag. 2004;21(4):246-258.
10. Danneels E. From the guest editor: dialogue on the effects of disruptive technology on firms and industries. J Prod Innov Manag. 2006;23(1):2-4.
11. Sood A, Tellis GJ. Demystifying disruption: a new model for understanding and predicting disruptive technologies. Mark Sci. 2011;30(2):339-354.
12. Goldin SB, Bradner MW, Zervos EE, Rosemurgy AS 2nd. Assessment of pancreatic neoplasms: review of biopsy techniques. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11(6):783-790.
13. Christensen CM, Scott A, Roth E. Seeing What Is Next. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.
14. Queneau PE, Sauve G, Koch S, et al. The impact on clinical practice of endoscopic ultrasonography used for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. JOP. 2001;2(3):98-104. (Pubitemid 38963869)
15. Ngamruengphong S, Li F, Zhou Y, Chak A, Cooper GS, Das A. EUS and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(1):78-83, 83.e1-2.