Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection

NeuroReport

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 441-446

  Berti, Stefan ^a  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

attention; auditory change detection; behavioral distraction; event related brain potentials; mismatch negativity; P3a; reaction time; reorienting negativity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY ORIENTATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; AUTOMATION; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND DETECTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SOUND; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84859941977     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: 1473558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32835308b5     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Grimm S, Escera C. Auditory deviance detection revisited: evidence for a hierarchical novelty system. Int J Psychophysiol 2011; (in press) doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.05.012.
2. Schröger E. On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:245-257. (Pubitemid 27225253)
3. Escera C, Alho K, Schröger E, Winkler I. Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:151-166. (Pubitemid 30312184)
4. May PJC, Tiitinen H. Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 2010; 47:66-122.
5. Winkler I, Czigler I. Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. Int J Psychophysiol 2012; 83:132-143.
6. Scherg M, Vajsar J, Picton TW. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1989; 1:336-355. (Pubitemid 20354918)
7. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr. Predictability of stimulus deviance and the mismatch negativity. Neuroreport 1998; 9:4167-4170. (Pubitemid 29030709)
8. Jankowiak S, Berti S. Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology 2007; 44:79-85. (Pubitemid 46103569)
9. Escera C, Corral MJ. Role of mismatch negativity and novelty-P3 in involuntary auditory attention. J Psychophysiol 2007; 21:251-264. (Pubitemid 351516010)
10. Schröger E, Wolff C. Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 1998; 7:71-87. (Pubitemid 28419440)
11. Berti S. Cognitive control after distraction: event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology 2008; 45:608-620. (Pubitemid 351832091)
12. Lynn R. Attention, arousal and the orientation reaction. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1966.
13. Yago E, Corral MJ, Escera C. Activation of brain mechanisms of attention switching as a function of auditory frequency change. Neuroreport 2001; 12:4093-4097. (Pubitemid 33152458)
14. Berti S, Roeber U, Schröger E. Bottom-up influences on working memory: behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Exp Psychol 2004; 51:249-257. (Pubitemid 39636753)
15. Escera C, Alho K,Winkler I, Näätänen R. Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 1998; 10:590-604. (Pubitemid 28484754)
16. Munka L, Berti S. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neurosci Lett 2006; 396:177-181. (Pubitemid 43331026)
17. Parmentier FB, Elsley JV, Andrés P, Barceló F. Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition 2011; 119:374-380.
18. Boll S, Berti S. Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology 2009; 46:645-654.
19. Rinne T, Särkkä A, Degerman A, Schröger E, Alho K. Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Res 2006; 1077:135-143.
20. Barry RJ. Habituation of the orienting reflex and the development of preliminary process theory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009; 92:235-242.
21. Berti S. Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neurosci Lett 2008; 434:200-205.
22. Hölig C, Berti S. To switch or not to switch: Brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features. Brain Res 2010; 1345:164-175.
23. Berti S. The attentional blink demonstrates automatic deviance processing in vision. Neuroreport 2011; 22:664-667.
24. Kimura M, Schröger E, Czigler I. Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences. Neuroreport 2011; 14:669-673.
25. Kimura M. Visual mismatch negativity and unintentional temporal-contextbased prediction in vision. Int J Psychophysiol 2012; 83:144-155.