How deviations from STAN guidelines contribute to operative delivery for suspected fetal distress

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-49

  Massoud, Mona ^a,b   Bloc, Fanny ^a,b   Gaucherand, Pascal ^a,b   Doret, Muriel ^a,b  

^a HOSPICES CIVILS DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

Author keywords

Guideline deviations; Operative delivery; Review; ST analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS HYPOXIA; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NEWBORN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ST SEGMENT;

EID: 84859927696     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.007     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Rosen KG. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18(3):485-514. (Pubitemid 38960619)
2. Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, et al. Cardiotocography only versus cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358(9281): 534-8. (Pubitemid 32772728)
3. Westgate J, Maureen H, Curnow J, Greene K. Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum monitoring in 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169(5):1151-60. (Pubitemid 24001631)
4. Ojala K, Vaarasmaki M, Makikallio K, Valkama M, Tekay A. A comparison of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography and conventional cardiotocography - a randomised controlled study. BJOG 2006;113(4):419-23.
5. Vayssiere C, David E, Meyer N. A French randomized controlled trial of ST-segment analysis in a population with abnormal cardiotocograms during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197(3):299e1-e6.
6. Westerhuis ME, Visser GHA, Moons KGM, et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram compared with cardiotocography only for intrapartum monitoring: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115(6):1173-80.
7. Westerhuis ME, Kwee A, van Ginkel AA, Drogtrop AP, Gyselaers WJA, Visser GHA. Limitations of ST analysis in clinical practice: three cases of intrapartum metabolic acidosis. BJOG 2007;114(10):1194-201. (Pubitemid 47414948)
8. Doria V, Papageorghiou AT, Gustafsson A, Ugwumadu A, Farrer K, Arulkumaran S. Review of the first 1502 cases of ECG-ST waveform analysis during labour in a teaching hospital. BJOG 2007;114(10):1202-7. (Pubitemid 47414976)
9. Doret M, Massoud M, Constans A, Gaucherand P. Use of peripartum ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram without blood sampling: a large prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2011;156(1):35-40.
10. Massoud M, Giannesi A, Amabile N, Manevy M, Geron G, Gaucherand P. Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: an observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;20(11):819-24. (Pubitemid 47613791)
11. Roth GA, Huch R. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1987;25:8.
12. Amer-Wahlin I, Kallen K, Herbst A, Rydhstroem H, Sundstrom AK, Marsal K. Implementation of new medical techniques: experience from the Swedish randomized controlled trial on fetal ECG during labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18(2):93-100. (Pubitemid 41527059)
13. Noren H, Carlsson A. Reduced prevalence of metabolic acidosis at birth: an analysis of established STAN usage in the total population of deliveries in a Swedish district hospital. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202(6):546e1-546e17.
14. Pehrson C, Sorensen JL, Amer-Wahlin I. Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review. BJOG 2011;118(8):926-35.
15. Costa A, Santos C, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa C, Bernardes J. Access to computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocographs improves clinicians' prediction of newborn umbilical artery blood pH. BJOG 2010;117(10):1288-93.
16. Ojala K, Makikallio K, Haapsamo M, Ijas H, Tekay A. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of intrapartum automated fetal electrocardiography in singleton pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87(5):536-40. (Pubitemid 351630858)
17. Amer-Wahlin I, Arulkumaran S, Hagberg H, Marsal K, Visser GHA. Fetal electrocardiogram: ST waveform analysis in intrapartum surveillance. BJOG 2007;114(10):1191-3. (Pubitemid 47414975)
18. Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O'Brien MA, Oxman AD. Does telling people what they have been doing change what they do? A systematic review of the effects of audit and feedback. Qual Saf Health Care 2006;15(6):433-6. (Pubitemid 46025156)
19. Amer-Wahlin I, Ingemarsson I, Marsal K, Herbst A. Fetal heart rate patterns and ECG ST segment changes preceding metabolic acidaemia at birth. BJOG 2005;112(2):160-5. (Pubitemid 40188243)
20. Vayssiere C, Tsatsaris V, Pirrello O, Cristini C, Arnaud C, Goffinet F. Interobserver agreement in clinical decision-making for abnormal cardiotocogram (CTG) during labour: a comparison between CTG and CTG plus STAN. BJOG 2009;116(8):1081-7 [discussion 1087-8].
21. Westerhuis ME, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GHA, Moons KGM. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG 2009;116(4): 545-51.