Fetal electrocardiotocography in labor and neonatal outcome: An observational study in 1889 patients in the French center of Edouard Herriot, Lyon

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 819-824

  Massoud, M ^a   Giannesi, A ^a   Amabile, N ^b   Manevy, M ^a   Geron, G ^a   Gaucherand, P ^a  

^a EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^b HÔPITAL NORD   (France)

Author keywords

Fetal distress; Fetal hypoxia; Metabolic acidosis; Operative delivery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FETUS ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART RATE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METABOLIC ACIDOSIS; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN MONITORING; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PARITY; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ST SEGMENT; UMBILICAL ARTERY; UMBILICAL VEIN;

ACIDOSIS, LACTIC; CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; FETAL DISTRESS; FRANCE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 35349014294     PISSN: 14767058     EISSN: 14764954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14767050701580564     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Hornbuckle J, Vail A, Abrams KR, Thornton JG. Bayesian interpretation of trials: The example of intrapartum electronic fetal heart monitoring. Br J Obstet Gynecol 2000;107:3-10.
2. Thacker SB, Stroup IF, Peterson HB. Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: An update. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:613-620.
3. Parer JT, King T. Fetal heart rate monitoring: Is it available? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:982-987.
4. Thacker SB, Stroup D, Chang M. Continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(2):CD000063.
5. Rosen KG, Kjellmer I. Changes in the fetal heart rate and ECG during hypoxia. Acta Physiol Scand 1975;93:59-66.
6. Westgate J, Harris M, Curnow JS, Greene KR. Plymouth randomized trial of cardiotocogram only versus ST waveform plus cardiotocogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: 2400 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1151-1160.
7. Amer-Wahlin I, Hellsten C, Noren H, Hagberg H, Herbst A, Kjellmer I, Lilja H, Lindoff C, Mansson M, Martensson L, et al. Cardiotocography plus ST analysis of fetal electrocardiogram for intrapartum fetal monitoring: A Swedish randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2001;358:534-538.
8. Rosen KG, Amer-Wahlin I, Luzietti R, Noren H. Fetal ECG waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004;18:485-514.
9. FIGO. Guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1987;25:159-167.
10. Sigaard-Anderson O. An acid base chart for arterial blood with normal and pathophysiological reference areas. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997;27:239-245.
11. Kwee A, Van Der Hoorn-Van Den Beld C, Veerman J, Dekkers AH, Visser GH. STAN S 21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: An observational study in 637 patients. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2004;15:400-407.
12. Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry 1957;20:53-70.
13. Granados A, Jonsson E, Banta HD, Bero L, Bonair A, Cochet C, Freemantle N, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, et al. EUR-ASSESS project subgroup report on dissemination and impact. Int J Techn Assess Health Care 1997;13:220-286.
14. Noren H, Blad S, Carlsson A, Flisberg A, Gustavsson A, Lilya H, Wennergren M, Haberg H. STAN in clinical practice. The outcome of 2 years of regular use in the city of Gothenburg. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:7-15.