A test for assessment of saproxylic beetle biodiversity using subsets of "monitoring species"

Ecological Indicators

Volumn 20, Issue , 2012, Pages 304-315

  Sebek, Pavel ^a,b   Barnouin, Thomas ^c   Brin, Antoine ^d   Brustel, Hervé ^d   Dufrêne, Marc ^e,f   Gosselin, Frederic ^a   Meriguet, Bruno ^g   Micas, Lilian ^c   Noblecourt, Thierry ^c   Rose, Olivier ^c   Velle, Laurent ^c   Bouget, Christophe ^a  

^a Cemagref   (France)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c Office National des Forets   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^e Departement of Natural and Rural Environnement Monitoring (SPW/DGARNE/DEMNA)   (Belgium)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^g OPIE (Office Pour les Insectes et Leur Environnement)   (France)

Author keywords

Biodiversity surrogate; Deadwood; Forest insects; Identification costs; Species richness

Indexed keywords

BELGIUM; COST BALANCE; COST-EFFICIENCY; DATA SETS; DEADWOOD; ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; ECOLOGICAL STUDIES; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; EUROPEAN FORESTS; FIELD INVENTORIES; FOREST INSECTS; FOREST PLOTS; FOREST STAND STRUCTURE; FOREST TYPE; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; MONITORING NETWORK; RARE SPECIES; SAPROXYLIC BEETLES; SPATIAL SCALE; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; TAXONOMICAL GROUPS; TRAP LEVELS; TRAPPING METHODS; WESTERN EUROPE;

BIODIVERSITY; COSTS; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES; MONITORING; SET THEORY; SURVEYS;

CONSERVATION;

BEETLE; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMONITORING; DATA SET; DEAD WOOD; IDENTIFICATION KEY; SAPROXYLIC ORGANISM; SPECIES RICHNESS; STAND STRUCTURE;

BELGIUM; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; COSTS; ECOLOGY; EUROPE; FORESTS; INSECTS; SURVEYS;

BELGIUM; FRANCE;

CERAMBYCIDAE; COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA;

EID: 84859863053     PISSN: 1470160X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.033     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. A. Báldi Using higher taxa as surrogates of species richness: a study based on 3700 Coleoptera Diptera, and Acari species in Central-Hungarian reserves Basic Appl. Ecol. 4 2003 589 593
2. A. Balmford, M.J.B. Green, and M.G. Murray Using higher-taxon richness as a surrogate for species richness: I. Regional tests Proc. Biol. Sci. 263 1996 1267 1274
3. Beggs, K.; 2000. Developing an analytical framework for monitoring biodiversity in Australia's rangelands. Background paper 4. Approaches to broad scale monitoring of biological diversity - a brief review of international experience. Report from the Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre.
4. C. Bouget Levels of taxonomic resolution in forest entomology studies: needs, contingencies and perspectives Mémoires de la Socié té Entomologique de France 8 2009 75 80 (in French)
5. C. Bouget, H. Brustel, and L.M. Nageleisen Nomenclature of wood-inhabiting groups in forest entomology: synthesis and semantic adjustments C. R. Biol. 328 2005 936 948
6. C. Bouget, H. Brustel, A. Brin, and T. Noblecourt Sampling saproxylic beetles with window flight traps: methodological insight Rev. Ecol. - Terre Vie 63 2008 13 24
7. Bouget, C.; Brustel, H.; Zagatti, P.; Noblecourt, T.; 2010. The French information system on saproxylic beetle ecology (FRISBEE): an ecological and taxonomical database to help with the assessment of forest conservation status. < http://frisbee.nogent.cemagref.fr/index.php/en/ >.
8. M. Bredemeier, P. Dennis, N. Sauberer, B. Petriccione, K. Török, C. Cocciufa, G. Morabito, and A. Pugnetti Biodiversity assessment and change - the challenge of appropriate methods R.E. Hester, R.M. Harrison, Biodiversity Under Threat. Issues in Environmental Science and Technology vol. 25 2007 Cambridge RSC Publishing 217 251
9. A. Brin, H. Brustel, and H. Jactel Species variables or environmental variables as indicators of forest biodiversity: a case study using saproxylic beetles in Maritime pine plantations Ann. Forest Sci. 66 2009 306 316
10. S.H.M. Butchart, H.R. Akcakaya, E. Kennedy, and C. Hilton-Taylor Biodiversity indicators based on trends in conservation status: strengths of the IUCN Red List Index Conserv. Biol. 20 2 2006 579 581
11. T. Caro Conservation by Proxy: Indicator, Umbrella, Keystone, Flagship, and Other Surrogate Species 2010 Island Press Washington, DC
12. R.K. Colwell, and J.A. Coddington Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 345 1994 101 118
13. S. Engen, B.-E. Sæther, A. Sverdrup-Thygeson, V. Grøtan, and F. Ødegaard Assessment of species diversity from species abundance distributions at different localities Oikos 117 2008 738 748
14. European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity The Indicative Map of European Biogeographical Regions: Methodology and Development 2006 Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris
15. J.M. Favreau, C.A. Drew, G.R. Hess, M.J. Rubino, F.H. Koch, and K.A. Eschelbach Recommendations for assessing the effectiveness of surrogate species approaches Biodivers. Conserv. 15 2006 3949 3969
16. P. Fayt, M. Dufrêne, E. Branquart, P. Hastir, C. Pontégnie, J.M. Henin, and V. Versteirt Contrasting responses of saproxylic insects to focal habitat resources: the example of longhorn beetles and hoverflies in Belgian deciduous forests J. Insect Conserv. 10 2006 129 150
17. R. Fischer, O. Granke, G. Chirici, P. Meyer, W. Seidling, S. Stofer, P. Corona, M. Marchetti, and D. Travaglini Background, main results and conclusions form a test phase for biodiversity assessments on intensive forest monitoring plots in Europe iForest: Biogeosci. Forest. 2 2009 58 65
18. K.J. Gaston Biodiversity: Ecology of Numbers and Difference 1996 Blackwell Science London
19. S.J. Grove Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33 2002 1 23
20. P. Halme, J.S. Kotiaho, A.L. Ylisirniö, J. Hottola, K. Junninen, J. Kouki, M. Lindgren, M. Mönkkönen, R. Penttilä, P. Renvall, J. Siitonen, and M. Similä Perennial polypores as indicators of annual and red-listed polypores Ecol. Indic. 9 2009 256 266
21. G.R. Hess, R.A. Bartel, A.K. Leidner, K.M. Rosenfeld, M.J. Rubino, S.B. Snider, and T.H. Ricketts Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region Biol. Conserv. 132 2006 448 457
22. A.J. Hirst Surrogate measures for assessing cryptic faunal biodiversity on macro-algal dominated subtidal reefs Biol. Conserv. 141 2008 211 220
23. A. Lassauce, Y. Paillet, H. Jactel, and C. Bouget Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms Ecol. Indic. 11 2011 1027 1039
24. R. Mac Nally, and E. Fleishman Using indicator species to model species richness: model development and predictions Ecol. Appl. 12 2002 79 92
25. R.H. Magierowski, and C.R. Johnson Robustness of surrogates of biodiversity in marine benthic communities Ecol. Appl. 16 2006 2264 2275
26. C.G. Majka The Eucnemidae (Coleoptera) of the Maritime provinces of Canada: new records, observations on composition and zoogeography, and comments on the rarity of saproxylic beetles Zootaxa 1636 2007 33 46
27. C.G. Majka, and S. Bondrup-Nielsen Parataxonomy: a test case using beetles Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 29 2006 149 156
28. Y. Mandelik, T. Dayan, V. Chikatunov, and V. Kravchenko The relative performance of taxonomic vs. environmental indicators for local biodiversity assessment: a comparative study Ecol. Indic. 15 1 2012 171 180
29. P. Martikainen, and L. Kaila Sampling saproxylic beetles: lessons from a 10-year monitoring study Biol. Conserv. 120 2004 171 181
30. P. Martikainen, and J. Kouki Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiveristy inventories Biodivers. Conserv. 12 2003 1815 1831
31. M.A. McGeoch The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 73 1998 181 201
32. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing. A Framework for Assessment 2003 Island Press Washington, DC 245 p
33. J. Müller, and M.M. Goßner Three-dimensional partitioning of diversity informs state-wide strategies for the conservation of saproxylic beetles Biol. Conserv. 143 2010 625 633
34. D. Murphy, P.S. Weiland, and K.W. Cummins A critical assessment of the use of surrogate species in conservation planning in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California (USA) Conserv. Biol. 25 5 2011 873 878
35. A. Nieto, and K.N.A. Alexander European Red List of Saproxylic Beetles 2010 Publication Office of the European Union Luxembourg
36. R.F. Noss Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach Conserv. Biol. 4 1990 355 364
37. I. Oliver, and A.J. Beattie Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity Ecol. Appl. 6 1996 594 607
38. M. Ohsawa Beetle families as indicators of Coleopteran diversity in forests: a study using Malaise traps in the central mountainous region of Japan J. Insect Conserv. 14 2010 479 484
39. C. Rahbek The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns Ecol. Lett. 8 2005 224 239
40. B. Reyers, and A.S. van Jaarsveld Assessment techniques for biodiversity surrogates S. Afr. J. Sci. 96 2000 406 408
41. A.S.L. Rodrigues, and T.M. Brooks Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38 2007 713 737
42. N. Sauberer, K.P. Zulka, M. Abensperg-Traun, H.M. Berg, G. Bieringer, N. Milasowszky, D. Moser, C. Plutzar, M. Pollheimer, C. Storch, R. Tröstl, H. Zechmeister, and G. Grabherr Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria Biol. Conserv. 117 2004 181 190
43. K. Schiegg Are there saproxylic beetle species characteristic of high dead wood connectivity? Ecography 23 2000 579 587
44. J. Schmidl, and H. Bussler Ökologische Gilden xylobionter Käfer Deutschlands und ihr Einsatz in der landschaftsökologischen Praxis-ein Bearbeitungsstandard Naturschutz Landsch. 36 2004 202 218
45. H. Sebastiao, and C.E.V. Grelle Taxon surrogates among Amazonian mammals: can total species richness be predicted by single orders? Ecol. Indic. 9 2009 160 166
46. W. Seidling, and R. Fischer Deviances from expected Ellenberg indicator values for nitrogen are related to N throughfall deposition in forests Ecol. Indic. 8 2008 639 646
47. J.C. Su, D.M. Debinski, M.E. Jakubauskas, and K. Kindscher Beyond species richness: community similarity as a measure of cross-taxon congruence for coarse-filter conservation Conserv. Biol. 18 2004 167 173
48. M.A. Vanderklift, T.J. Ward, and J.C. Phillips Use of assemblages derived from different taxonomic levels to select areas for conserving marine biodiversity Biol. Conserv. 86 1998 307 315
49. M. Vellend, P.L. Lilley, and B.M. Starzomski Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys J. Appl. Ecol. 45 2008 161 169
50. S. Vodka, M. Konvicka, and L. Cizek Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management J. Insect Conserv. 13 2009 553 562