The sorting effect of charter schools on student composition in traditional public schools

Educational Policy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 215-242

  Ni, Yongmei ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

charter schools; disadvantaged students; social isolation; urban schools

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859809238     PISSN: 08959048     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0895904810386598     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arsen D.,Plank D.,Sykes G.School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. East Lansing: Michigan State University; 1999:.
2. Arsen D.,Ray L.When do charter schools enroll students with disabilities?.Journal of Special Education Leadership. 2004;17 (2): 71-81.
3. Bell C.All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools.Peabody Journal of Education. 2009;84:191-208.
4. Bifulco R.,Cobb C.D.,Bell C.Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut's interdistrict magnet school program. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education; 2009:.
5. Bifulco R.,Ladd H.,Ross S.The effects of public school choice on those left behind: Evidence from Durham, North Carolina.Peabody Journal of Education. 2009;84 (2): 130-149.
6. Bifulco R.,Ladd H.F.School choice, racial segregation, and test-score gaps: Evidence from North Carolina's charter school program.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2006;26 (1): 31-56.
7. Booker K.,Zimmer R.,Buddin R.The effects of charter schools on school peer composition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2005:.
8. Cobb C.D.,Glass G.V.School choice in a post-desegregation world.Peabody Journal of Education. 2009;84:262-278.
9. Dee T.S.,Fu H.Do charter schools skim students or drain resources?.Economics of Education Review. 2004;23:259-271.
10. Eaton S.E.The other Boston busing story. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2001:.
11. Finn C.E.,Manno B.V.,Vanourek G.Charter schools in action: Renewing public education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000:.
12. Fiske E.B.,Ladd H.F.When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2000:.
13. Friedman M.Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
14. Garcia D.R.Academic and racial segregation in charter schools.Education and Urban Society. 2008;40:590-612.
15. Hallinan M.T.Diversity effects on student outcomes: Social science evidence.Ohio State Law Review. 1998;59:733-754.
16. Hamilton L.,Guin K.Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy. Betts R.Loveless T., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2005:40-60.
17. Hanushek E.A.,Kain J.F.,Markman J.M.,Rivkin S.G.Does peer ability affect student achievement?.Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2003;18:527-544.
18. Holme J.,Richards M.School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice.Peabody Journal of Education. 2009;84:150-171.
19. Kleitz B.,Weiher G.,Tedin K.,Matland R.Choice, charter schools, and household preferences.Social Science Quarterly. 2000;81 (3): 846-854.
20. Koedel C.,Betts J.,Rice L.,Zau A.The integrating and segregating effects of school choice.Peabody Journal of Education. 2009;84 (2): 110-129.
21. Lacireno-Paquet N.,Brantley C.Who chooses schools, and why?. Tempe, AZ and Boulder, CO: Education Policy Research Unit, Arizona State University & Education and the Public Interest Center, University of Colorado; 2008:.
22. Ladd H.F.School vouchers: A critical view.Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2002;16 (4): 3-24.
23. Levin H.M.Educational vouchers: Effectiveness, choice, and costs.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 1998;17:373-392.
24. Michigan Department of Education. (1993). Charter public schools. Retrieved September 14, 2009, from http://www.michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_30334_40088-,00.html.
25. Miron G.,Nelson C.What's public about charter schools: Lessons learned about choice and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2002:.
26. Pettigrew T.F.,Tropp L.R.A meta-analytic test of inter-group contact theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;90:751-783.
27. Raudenbush S.W.,Bryk A.S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 2002:.
28. Ross K.E.Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy. Betts J.Loveless T., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2005:146-175.
29. Schneider M.,Teske P.,Marschall M.Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2000:.
30. Viteritti J.P.Choosing equality: School choice, the constitution, and civil society. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 1999:.
31. Weiher G.R.,Tedin K.L.Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2002;21 (1): 79-92.
32. Wells A.S.,Crain R.L.Perpetuation theory and the long-term effects of school desegregation. Review of educational research.Review of Educational Research. 1994;64:531-555.
33. Wells A.S.,Holme J.J.,Lopez A.,Cooper C.W.A notion at risk: Preserving education as an engine for social mobility. Kahlenberg R.D., ed. New York: Century Foundation Press; 2000:169-221.
34. Welner K.,Howe K.School choice and student diversity: What the evidence says. Scott J., ed. New York: Teachers College Press; 2005:93-111.
35. Zimmer R.W.,Toma E.F.Peer effects in private and public schools across countries.Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2000;19 (1): 75-92.