The future of historical family demography

Annual Review of Sociology

Volumn 38, Issue , 2012, Pages 423-441

  Ruggles, Steven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Family composition; Family transition; Historical sociology; Patriarchal family

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859796590     PISSN: 03600572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145533     Document Type: Review

References (111)

1. Alter G, Mandemakers K, Gutmann MP. 2009. Defining and distributing longitudinal historical data in a general way through an intermediate structure.Hist. Soc. Res. 34:78-114
2. BerknerL. 1972. The stem family and the developmental cycle of the peasant household: An eighteenth-century Austrian example. Am. Hist. Rev. 77:398-418
3. Bongaarts J, Burch TK, Wachter KW, eds. 1987. Family Demography: Methods and Their Application. Oxford Clarendon
4. Breschi M, Forasin A, Manfredini M, Zaccchigna M. 2009. Family composition and remarriage in pretransitional Italy: A comparative study. Eur. J. Popul. 25:277-96
5. Burch TK. 1967. The size and structure of families: A comparative analysis of census data. Am. Sociol. Rev. 32:347-63
6. Cain M, McNicoll G. 1988. Population growth and agrarian outcomes. In Population, Food and Rural Development, ed. RD Lee, WB Arthur, AC Kelley, G Rogers, 101-11. Oxford: Clarendon
7. CalvertR. 1974. Criminal and civil liability in husband-wife assaults. In Violence in the Family, ed. SK Steinmetz, MA Straus, 88-91. New York: Harper & Row
8. Carter S, Gartner SS, Haines M, Olmsted A, Sutch R, Wright G, eds. 2006. Historical Statistics of the United States: Millennial Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
9. Chattopadhyay A, Marsh R. 1999. Changes in living arrangement and familial support for the elderly in Taiwan: 1963-1991. J. Comp. Fam. Stud. 30:523-37
10. Cherlin AJ. 1992. Marriage, cohabitation, sexual behavior, and childbearing inNorth America. In The Peopling of the Americas, Proceedings of the IUSSP Conference at Veracruz, Mexico, May 17-23, 1992, 3:223-43. Liège, Belg.: nt. Union Sci. Study Popul.
11. Cherlin AJ. 2003. Family demography. In Encyclopedia of Population, ed. P Demeny, G McNicoll, 355-61. New York: Macmillan Ref.
12. Coale AJ. 1973. The demographic transition reconsidered. In Proceedings of the International Population Conference, Liege 1973, 1:55-72. Liège, Belg.: Int. Union Sci. Study Popul.
13. CollinsWJ, Margo RA. 2004. Race, home ownership, and family structure in twentieth-century America. In What Has Happened to the Quality of Life in the Advanced Industrialized Nations?, ed.EN Wolff, 187-213. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
14. Costa DL. 1999. A house of her own: Old age assistance and the living arrangements of older nonmarried women. J. Public Econ. 72:39-59
15. Cvrcek T. 2011. U.S. marital disruptions and their economic and social correlates, 1860-1948. J. Fam. Hist. 36:142-58
16. Czap P. 1982. The perennial multiple family household: Mishino, Russia, 1782-1858. J. Fam. Hist. 7:5-26
17. Devas CS. 1886. Studies of Family Life: A Contribution to Social Science. London: Burns & Oates
18. De Vos S, Palloni A. 1989. Formal models and methods for analyzing kinship and household organization. Popul. Index 55:174-98
19. Durkheim É . 1888. Introduction ála sociologie de la famille. Ann. Fac. Lett. Bordx. 10:257-82
20. EHPS-Net. 2011. European Historical Population Samples Network (EHPS-Net). Amsterdam: Int. Inst. Soc.Hist. http://www.iisg.nl/hsn/news/ehps- net.php
21. Elder GH Jr. 1978. Family history and the life course. J. Fam. Hist. 2:279-304
22. Emerton R, Adams K, Byrnes A, Connors J. 2005. International Women's Rights Cases. London: Cavendish
23. Fauve-Chamoux A. 1984. Les structures familiales au royaume des familles-souches: Esparros Ann. Econ. Soc. Civiliz. 3:513-28
24. Fauve-Chamoux A, Ochiai E. 2009. The Stem Family in Eurasian Perspective: RevisitingHouse Societies, 17th-20th Centuries. Bern: Peter Lang
25. Fussell E, Furstenberg FF. 2005. The transition to adulthood during the 20th century: Differences by race, nativity and gender. In On The Frontier of Adulthood: Theory, Research, and Public Policy, ed. RA Settersten, FF Furstenberg, RG Rumbaut, 29-75. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
26. General Register Office. 1968. Sample Census 1966, England and Wales: Household Composition Tables. London: H.M.S.O.
27. Gibbon P, Curtin C. 1978. The stem family in Ireland. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 20:429-53
28. Glass DV. 1966. London Inhabitants Within the Walls, 1695. Leicester: London Rec. Soc.
29. Glick PC. 1941. Types of families: An analysis of census data. Am. Sociol. Rev. 6:830-38
30. Glick PC. 1988. Fifty years of family demography: A record of social change. J. Marriage Fam. 50:861-73
31. Goeken R, Huynh L, Lenius T, Vick R. 2011. New methods of census record linking. Hist. Methods 44:7-14
32. Goldscheider FK, Bures RM. 2003. The racial crossover in family complexity in the United States. Demography 40:569-87 (Pubitemid 38762728)
33. Goode WJ. 1963. World Revolution and Family Patterns. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
34. Gratton B, Gutmann MP. 2010. Emptying the nest: Older men in the United States, 1880-2000. Popul. Dev. Rev. 36:331-56
35. Greenfield SM. 1961. Industrialization and the family in sociological theory. Am. J. Sociol. 67:312-22
36. Gruber S, Szoltysek M. 2011. Stem families, joint families, and the European pattern: How much of a reconsideration do we need? MPIDR Work. Pap.WP 2011-001, Max Planck Inst. Demogr. Res., Rostock, Ger.
37. GutmannMP, Deane GD, Merchant ER, Sylvester K. 2011. Navigating time and space in population studies. Int. Stud. Popul. 9:1-17
38. Hajnal J. 1965. European marriage patterns in perspective. In Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography, ed. DV Glass, DEC Eversley, 101-43. London: Arnold
39. Hajnal J. 1982. Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Popul. Dev. Rev. 8:449-94
40. HartmanMS. 2004. The Household and the Making of History: A Subversive View of the Western Past. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Heggeness M. 2010. Essays on marital instability, household behavior, and social policy in developing countries. PhD diss., Univ. Minn. Appl. Econ.
42. I-CeM. 2011. Integrated Census Microdata (I-CeM) Project. Essex, UK: Dep. Hist., Univ. Essex. http://www.essex.ac.uk/history/research/ICeM/default.aspx
43. IPUMS. 2011. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series. Minneapolis: Minn. Popul. Cent., Univ. Minn. http://www.ipums.org
44. JåstadH. 2011. Northern co-residence across generations in Northernmost Norway during the last part of the nineteenth century. PhD Art thesis. Univ. Tromsø. 77
45. Kaser K. 1994. The Balkan joint family: Redefining a problem. Soc. Sci. Hist. 18:243-69
46. Kertzer DI. 1989. The joint family household revisited: Demographic constraints and household complexity in the European past. J. Fam. Hist. 14:1-15
47. Kok J. 2007. Principles and prospects of the life course paradigm. Ann. Démogr. Hist. 2007:203-30
48. Lamanna MA. 2002. Émile Durkheim on the Family. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage
49. Laslett P. 1965. The World We Have Lost. New York: Scribner
50. Laslett P. 1969. Size and structure of the household in England over three centuries. Popul. Stud. 23:199-223
51. Laslett P. 1970. The comparative history of household and family. J. Soc. Hist. 4:75-87
52. Laslett P. 1982. Family and household as work group and kin group: Areas of traditional Europe compared. In Family Forms in Historic Europe, ed. R Wall, J Robin, P Laslett, 513-64. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
53. Laslett P, Wall R. 1972. Household and Family in Past Time: Comparative Studies in the Size and Structure of the Domestic Group over the Last Three Centuries in England, France, Serbia, Japan, and Colonial North America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
54. Lee JZ, Campbell CD. 2011. China Multi-Generational Panel Dataset, Liaoning (CMGPD-LN), 1749-1909. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Polit. Soc. Res.
55. Lee YJ. 2006. Risk factors in the rapidly rising incidence of divorce in Korea. Asian Popul. Stud. 2:113-31
56. Le Play F. 1855. Les Ouvriers Europeéns: É tudes sur les Travaux, la Vie Domestique, et la Condition Morale des Populations Ouvières de l'Europe. Paris, Fr.: Impr. Imp.
57. Le Play F. 1871. L'organisation de la Famille Selon le Vrai Modèle Signalé par L'histoire de Toutes les Races et de Tous les Temps. Tours, Fr.: Mame
58. Le Play F. 1872. The Organization of Labor: In Accordance with Custom and the Law of the Decalogue. Transl. Gouverneur Emerson, MD. Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen & Haffelfinger
59. Lesthaeghe R. 1983. A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Popul. Dev. Rev. 9:411-35
60. Lesthaeghe R. 2009. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 36:211-51
61. Lindert P. 2004. Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
62. Litwak E. 1960. Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:385-94
63. Macfarlane A. 1986. Marriage and Love in England: Modes of Reproduction 1300-1840. Oxford: Blackwell
64. Macfarlane A. 1987. The Culture of Capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell
65. Minnesota Population Center 2011. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 6.1. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn.
66. Moring B. 2009. Land, inheritance, and the Finnish stem family. See Fauve-Chamoux&Ochiai 2009, 173-203
67. Mosaic. 2011. Recovering Surviving Census Records to Reconstruct Population, Economic, and Cultural History. Rostock, Ger: Max Planck Inst. Demogr. Res. http://www.censusmosaic.org
68. Murphy M. 2011. Long-term effects of the demographic transition on family and kinship networks in Britain. Popul. Dev. Rev. 37:55-80
69. NA 2011. North Atlantic Population Project. Minneapolis: Minn. Popul. Cent., Univ. Minn. http://www. nappdata.org
70. Nevin M. 2002. The influence of the wider kin group on individual life-course transitions: Results from the Pays de Herve (Belgium), 1846-1900. Contin. Change 17:405-35
71. Nixon JW. 1952. On the size, constitution and housing standards of households in England and Wales, 1931 and 1951. Rev. Inst. Int. Stat. 20:135-47
72. Norwegian Historical Data Centre. 2011. Historical Population Registers. Tromsø, Nor.: Univ. Tromsø. http://www.rhd.uit.no/nhDC /hpr.htm l
73. Ogburn WE. 1933. The family and its functions. In Recent Social Trends in the United States: Report of the President's Research Committee on Social Trends, 661-708. New York: McGraw-Hill
74. Palloni A. 2001. Living arrangements of older persons. In Population Bulletin of the United Nations: Population Ageing and Living Arrangements of Older Persons: Critical Issues and Policy Responses, Special Issue 43/43, 54-110. New York: United Nations
75. Parsons T. 1944. The social structure of the family. In The Family: Its Function and Destiny, ed. RN Anshen, 173-201. New York: Harper
76. Parsons T. 1955. The American family. In Family Socialization and Interaction Process, ed. T Parsons, RF Bales, 3-33. Glencoe, IL: Free Press
77. Plakans A, Wetherell C. 2005. The Hajnal line and Eastern Europe. In Marriage and the Family in Eurasia: Perspectives on the Hajnal Hypothesis, ed. T Engelen, APWolff, 105-28. Amsterdam: Aksant Acad.
78. POPLINK. 2011. Information om Hantering av personuppgifter i databasen POPLINK. Umeå, Sweden: Demogr. Database, Univ. Umeå. http://www.ddb.umu.se/databaser/poplink
79. Post W, Van Poppel F, Van Imhoff E, Kruse E. 1997. Reconstructing the extended kin-network in the Netherlands with genealogical data: Methods, problems, and results. Popul. Stud. 51:263-78
80. Rosenfeld MJ. 2006. Young adulthood as a factor in social change in the United States. Popul. Dev. Rev. 32:27-51
81. Raymo J, Iwasawa M, Bumpass L. 2009. Cohabitation and family formation in Japan. Demography 46:785-803
82. Ruggles S. 1987. Prolonged Connections: The Rise of the Extended Family in Nineteenth-Century England and America. Madison: Univ. Wis. Press
83. Ruggles S. 1994. The transformation of American family structure. Am. Hist. Rev. 99:103-28
84. Ruggles S. 1997. The rise of divorce and separation in the United States, 1880-1990. Demography 34:455-66 (Pubitemid 127454434)
85. Ruggles S. 2007. The decline of intergenerational coresidence in the United States, 1850-2000. Am. Sociol. Rev. 72:962-89
86. Ruggles S. 2009. Reconsidering the Northwest European family system: Living arrangements of the aged in comparative historical perspective. Popul. Dev. Rev. 35:249-73
87. Ruggles S. 2010. Stem families and joint families in comparative historical perspective. Popul. Dev. Rev. 35:249-73
88. Ruggles S, Brower S. 2003. The measurement of family and household composition in the United States, 1850-1999. Popul. Dev. Rev. 29:73-101 (Pubitemid 36797028)
89. Ruggles S, Heggeness M. 2008. Intergenerational families in developing countries. Popul. Dev. Rev. 34:253-81
90. Ruggles S, RobertsE, Sarkar S, SobekM. 2011. TheNorth Atlantic Population Project: Progress and prospects. Hist. Methods 44:1-6
91. Sager EW, Baskerville PA. 2010. Canadian historical research and pedagogy: A view from the perspective of the Canadian Century Research Infrastructure. Can. Hist. Rev. 91:533-51
92. Schürer K. 2003. Introduction: Household and family in past time further explored. Contin. Change 18:9-21 (Pubitemid 37156210)
93. Short SE, Goldscheider FK, Torr BM. 2006. Less help formother: The decline in coresidential female support for the mothers of young children, 1880-2000. Demography 43:617-29 (Pubitemid 44914494)
94. Siegel RB. 1996. "The rule of love": Wife beating as prerogative and privacy. Yale Law J. 105:2117-207 (Pubitemid 126729152)
95. Sobek M, Cleveland L, Flood S, Hall PK, King ML, et al. 2011. Big data: Large-scale historical infrastructure from the Minnesota Population Center. Hist. Methods 44:61-68
96. Sobotka T, Toulemon L. 2008. Changing family and partnership behaviour: Common trends and persistent diversity across Europe. Demogr. Res. 19:85-138
97. Sogner S. 2009. The Norwegian stem family: Myth or reality? See Fauve-Chamoux & Ochiai 2009, 151-72
98. Sussman MB. 1959. The isolated nuclear family: Fact or fiction. Soc. Probl. 6:333-40
99. Szoltysek M. 2009. Life-cycle service and family systems in the rural countryside: A lesson from historical East-Central Europe. Ann. Démogr. Hist. 117:53-94
100. Therborn G. 2004. Between Sex and Power: Family in the World 1900-2000. London: Routledge
101. Tolnay SE. 2004. The living arrangements of African American and immigrant children, 1880-2000. J. Fam. Hist. 29:421-5
102. United Nations. 2001. Principles and Recommendations for a Vital Statistics System, Revision 2. NewYork: United Nations
103. United Nations. 2005. Living Arrangements of Older Persons Around the World. New York: United Nations
104. Van Baelen H, MatthijsK. 2007. Comparing two methods to reconstruct the kin network outside the household with nineteenth-century Antwerp data. J. Fam. Hist. 32:149-60
105. Verdon M. 1998. Rethinking Households: An Atomistic Perspective on European Living Arrangements. London/New York: Routledge
106. Wall R. 2009. Ideology and reality of the stem family in the writings of Frédéric Le Play. See Fauve-Chamoux & Ochiai 2009, 53-80
107. Wheaton R. 1975. Family and kinship in Western Europe: The problem of the joint family household. J. Interdis. Hist. 5:601-28
108. Wolf D. 1994. The elderly and their kin: Patterns of availability and access. In Demography of Aging, ed. LG Martin, SH Preston, 146-94. Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
109. World Bank. 2011. World Development Indicators 2011. Online. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.CDRT.IN
110. Wrigley EA. 1969. Population and History. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson
111. Wrigley EA, Schofield RS. 1981. The Population History of England 1541-1871: A Reconstruction. London: Edward Arnold