The North Atlantic population project: Progress and prospects

Historical Methods

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-6

  Ruggles, Steven ^a   Roberts, Evan ^a   Sarkar, Sula ^a   Sobek, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

census; database; demography; international; microdata

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; DATA SET; DATABASE; DEMOGRAPHIC METHOD; DEMOGRAPHIC SURVEY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; POPULATION MODELING; RESEARCH WORK;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 79952011952     PISSN: 01615440     EISSN: 19401906     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01615440.2010.515377     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Abe, S. 2005. Support vector machines for pattern classification. London: Springer-Verlag.
2. Anderson, M. 1972. Family structure in nineteenth century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Astone, N. M., and S. S. McLanahan. 1994. Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography 31:575-584.
4. Cain, M., and G. McNicoll. 1988. Population growth and agrarian outcomes. In Population, food and rural development, ed. R. D. Lee, W. B. Arthur, A. C Kelley, G. Rodgers, and T. N. Srinivasan, 101-117. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50 (RR17): 1-17.
6. Christiani, N., and J. Shawe-Taylor. 2000. An introduction to support vector machines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cooper, J. A. 2006. Interstate competition and state death taxes: A modern crisis in historical perspective. Pepperdine Law Review 3:835-81.
8. De Tocqueville, A. 1862. Democracy in AmericaTrans. H. Reeve. Cambridge, MA: Sever and Francis.
9. Department of Health and Human Services. 2002. Essentials for attorneys in child support enforcement. Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Child Support Enforcement.
10. Ferrie, J. 2005. The end of American exceptionalism? Mobility in the U.S. since 1850. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19:199-215. (Pubitemid 41634744)
11. Foster, J. O.1974. Class struggle and the industrial revolution: Early industrial capitalism in three English towns. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
12. Goeken, R., and P. K. Hall. Forthcoming. New findings on internal migration using linked records. Historical Methods.
13. Goeken, R., L. Huynh, T. A. Lynch, and R. Vick. 2011. New methods of census linking. Historical Methods 44:7-14
14. Hajnal. 1982. Two kinds ofpreindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review 8:449-94.
15. Hall, P. K., and S. Ruggles. 2004. "Restless in the midst of their prosperity": New evidence of the internal migration patterns of Americans, 1850-1990. Journal of American History 91:829-46.
16. Hareven, T. 1978. The dynamics of kin in an industrial community. American Journal of Sociology 84:S151-S182.
17. Hartman, M. S. 2004. The householdand the making ofhistory: A subversive view of the Westernpast. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Janssens, A. 1993. Family andsocial change: The householdasaprocess in an industrializing community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Katz, M. B. 1975. The people of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and class in a mid-nineteenth-century city. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Katz, M. B., M. J. Doucet, and M. J. Stern. 1982. The social organization of early industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Lait, A. J., and B. Randell. 1993. An assessment of name matching algorithms. Department Technical Report Series No. 550. Department of Computing Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, England. http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac. uk/brian.randell/home.informal/Genealogy/NameMatching.pdf
22. Laslett, P. 1972. Introduction: The history of the family. In Household and family in past time, ed. P. Laslett and R. Wall, 1-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Litwak, E. 1960. Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion. American Sociological Review 25:385-94.
24. Long, J. 2005. A tale of two labor markets: Intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the U.S. since 1850. Working Paper #W11253, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11253
25. Long, J., and J. P. Ferrie. 2007. The path to convergence: Intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the U.S. in three eras. Economic Journal 117:C61-C71. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgibin/ fulltext/117984644/PDFSTART (Pubitemid 46915798)
26. Macfarlane, A. 1978. The origins of English individualism: The family, property and social transition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. -. 1986. Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300-1800. Oxford: Blackwell.
28. Modell, J. 1978. Patterns of consumption, acculturation, and family income strategies in late nineteenth-century America. In Family and Population in Nineteenth-Century America, ed. T K. Hareven and M. A. Vinovskis, 206-40. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29. Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P. 2005. Effects of mobility on health. In Environmental health impacts of transport and mobility, eds. P. NicolopoulouStamati, L. Hens, and C V. Howard, 1-7. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
30. Pamarthy, K. 2007. A machine learning framework for record linkage in census data. Master of Science Report, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, May.
31. Parsons, T., and R. F. Bales. 1955. Family, socialization and interaction process. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
32. Philips, L. 2000. The double-metaphone search algorithm. C/C++ User's Journal 18:38-43.
33. Piekarski, C 2004. The effect of an increasingly mobile society on Kentucky's grandparent visitation statute: The ability of courts to enforce their orders. Brandeis Law Journal 42:693-710.
34. Porter, E. H., and W. E. Winkler. 1997. Approximate string comparison and its effect on an advanced record linkage system. Census Bureau Research Report RR97/02. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, DC http://www.fcsm.gov/working- papers/porter-winkler.pdf
35. Reher, D. S. 1998. Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review 24:203-34. (Pubitemid 128464436)
36. Roberts, E., S. Ruggles, L. Dillon, O. Gardarsdottir, J. Oldervoll, G. Thorvaldsen, et al. 2003. The North Atlantic Population Project: An overview. Historical Methods 36:80-88. (Pubitemid 37002385)
37. Ruggles, S. 1987. Prolonged connections: The rise of the extended family in nineteenth-century England and America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
38. -. 2006. Linking historical censuses: A new approach. History and Computing 14:213-24. http://www.hist.umn.edu/̃ruggles/Articles/linking.pdf
39. -. 2009. Reconsidering the northwest European family system: Living arrangements of the aged in comparative historical perspective. Population and Development Review 35:249-73. http://www3rd.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/ fulltext/122456480/PDFSTART
40. -. 2010. Stem families and joint families in comparative historical perspective. Population and Development Review 36:563-77.
41. Thernstrom, S. 1964. Poverty andprogress: Social mobility in a nineteenth century city. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. -. 1973. The other Bostonians: Poverty and progress in the American metropolis, 1880-1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Thornton, A. 2005. Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact ofthe developmentalparadigm onfamily life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Vapnik, V. N. 1998. Statistical learning theory. New York: Wiley Interscience.
45. Wolf, D. A., and C F Longino. 2005. Our "increasingly mobile society?" The curious persistence of a false belief. Gerontologist 45:5-11. (Pubitemid 40229526)