Evaluation of lymph node metastases: Comparison of gadofluorine M-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI in a rabbit VX2 rectal cancer model

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1179-1186

  Kim, Seung Ho ^a   Lee, Jeong Min ^b   Moon, Sung Kyoung ^c   Chung, Yong Eun ^d   Paik, Jin Ho ^e   Choi, Seung Hong ^b   Kim, Min Uk ^b   Han, Joon Koo ^b   Choi, Byung Ihn ^b  

^a Inje University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Kyung Hee University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging; Experimental study; Gadofluorine M; Lymph node

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOFLUORINE M; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CANCER MODEL; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; EVALUATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; RADIOLOGIST; RECTUM CANCER; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM TRANSPLANTATION; NEOPLASMS, EXPERIMENTAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; RABBITS; RECTAL NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84859793688     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23513     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Jermal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96. (Pubitemid 351521864)
2. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1731-1740.
3. Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1114-1123. (Pubitemid 44394918)
4. Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, et al. Colon and rectum. In: Edge SB, editor. AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th ed. New York: Springer; 2009. p 143-159.
5. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL. Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging. Radiology 2004;232:335-346. (Pubitemid 38971269)
6. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, et al. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 2003;90:355-364. (Pubitemid 36324117)
7. Beets-Tan RG, Beets GL, Vliegen RF, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumor-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery. Lancet 2001;357:497-504. (Pubitemid 32173585)
8. Bipat S, Glas AS, Slors FJ, et al. Local staging and assessment of LN involvement with US, CT, and MRI - a meta-analysis. Radiology 2004;232:773-783. (Pubitemid 39100263)
9. Kotanagi H, Fukuoka T, Shibata Y, et al. The size of regional lymph nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes in rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 1993;54:252-254. (Pubitemid 24004480)
10. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F, et al. Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer 1996;77:607-612. (Pubitemid 26055383)
11. Kim JH, Beets GL, Kim MJ, et al. High-resolution MR imaging for nodal staging in rectal cancer: are there any criteria in addition to the size? Eur J Radiol 2004;52:78-83. (Pubitemid 39233657)
12. Abdel Razek AA, Kandeel AY, Soliman N, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation of residual or recurrent head and neck tumors and posttreatment changes. Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1146-1152. (Pubitemid 46984559)
13. Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 2006;16:1468-1477. (Pubitemid 43871818)
14. Kim JK, Kim KA, Park BW, et al. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:714-719.
15. Park SO, Kim JK, Kim KA, et al. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:383-390.
16. Misselwitz B, Platzek J, Weinmann HJ. Early MR lymphography with gadofluorine M in rabbits. Radiology 2004;231:682-688. (Pubitemid 38668083)
17. Raatschen HJ, Swain R, Shames DM, et al. MRI tumor characterization using Gd-GlyMe-DOTA-perfluorooctyl-mannose-conjugate (Gadofluorine M), a protein-avid contrast agent. Contrast Media Mol Imaging 2006;1:113-120.
18. Choi SH, Han MH, Moon WK, et al. Cervical lymph node metastases: MR imaging of gadofluorine M and monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticle-47 in a rabbit model of head and neck cancer. Radiology 2006;241:753-762. (Pubitemid 46190541)
19. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1622-1635. (Pubitemid 46866868)
20. Patterson DM, Padhani AR, Collins DJ. Technology insight: water diffusion MRI - a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008;5:220-233. (Pubitemid 351493681)
21. Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 2009;11:102-125.
22. Yasui O, Sato M, Kamada A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. Tohoku J Exp Med 2009;218:177-183.
23. Kim SH, Lee JM, Lee MW et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-Tesla rectal magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of primary rectal cancer. Invest Radiol 2008;43:587-593.
24. Choi EK, Kim JK, Choi HJ, et al. Node-by-node correlation between MR and PET/CT in patients with uterine cervical cancer: diffusion-weighted imaging versus size-based criteria on T2WI. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2024-2032.
25. Liang XM, Tang GY, Cheng YS, et al. Evaluation of a rabbit rectal VX2 carcinoma model using computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:2139-2144.
26. Roy C, Bierry G, Matau A, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging to detect small malignant pelvic lymph nodes at 3T. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1803-1811.
27. Rao JN, Scott AJ. A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992;48:577-585.
28. Zhou X, Obuchowski NA, McClith DK. Statistical methods in diagnostic medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002. p 165-171.