An evaluation of the multiple mini-interview as a selection tool for dental students

British Dental Journal

Volumn 212, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 331-335

  McAndrew, R ^a   Ellis, J ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL STUDENT; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; STUDENTS, DENTAL;

EID: 84859790246     PISSN: 00070610     EISSN: 17417503     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.267     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Harris S, Owen C. Discerning quality: Using the multiple mini-interview in student selection for the Australian National University Medical School. Med Educ 2007; 41: 234-241. (Pubitemid 46280569)
2. Norman G R. Editorial: The morality of medical school admissions. Adv Health Sci Educ 2004; 9: 79-82.
3. Albanese M A, Snow M H, Skochelak S E, Huggett K N, Farrell P M. Assessing personal qualities in medical school admissions. Acad Med 2003; 78: 313-321. (Pubitemid 36343272)
4. Story M, Mercer A. Selection of medical students: An Australian persepective. Inter Med J 2005; 35: 647-649. (Pubitemid 41711972)
5. Edwards J C, Johnson E K, Molidor J B. The interview in the admission process. Acad Med 1990; 65: 167-177. (Pubitemid 20107024)
6. Kreiter C D, Yin P, Solow C, Brennan R L. Investigating the reliability of the medical school admissions interview. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004; 9: 147-159. (Pubitemid 38987557)
7. Streyffeler L, Altmaier E M, Kuperman S, Patrick L E. Development of a medical schools admissions interview phase 2: Predictive validity of cognitive and non-cognitive attributes. Med Educ Online 2005; 10: 1-5.
8. Eva K W, Reiter H I, Rosenfeld J, Norman G R. The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med 2004; 79: 602-609. (Pubitemid 38691488)
9. Roberts C, Walton M, Rothnie I et al. Factors affecting the utility of the multiple mini-interview in selecting candidates for graduate-entry medical school. Med Educ 2008; 42: 396-404. (Pubitemid 351388742)
10. Eva K W, Reiter H I, Rosenfeld J, Norman G R. The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict preclerkship performance in medical school. Acad Med 2004; 79: S40-42. (Pubitemid 39281212)
11. Brownwell K, Lockyer J, Collin T, Lemay J F. Introduction of the multiple mini interview into the admissions process at the University of Calgary: Acceptability and feasibility. Med Teach 2007; 29: 394-396. (Pubitemid 47386755)
12. Humphrey S, Dowson S, Wall D, Diwakar V, Goodyear H M. Multiple mini-interviews: Opinions of candidates and interviewers. Med Educ 2008; 42: 207-213.
13. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J 2000; 320: 114-116.
14. Cleland J A, Knight L V. Rees C E, Tracey S, Bond C M. Is it me or is it them? Factors that influence the passing of underperforming students. Med Educ 2008; 42: 800-809. (Pubitemid 352019171)