Using sensors to measure activity in people with stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 746-757

  Fulk, George D ^a   Sazonov, Edward ^b,c  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Clarkson University   (United States)

^c The Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics Department   (United States)

Author keywords

accelerometry; physical activity; stroke; wearable sensors

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOSENSOR; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RECALL; SITTING; STANDING; STROKE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; WALKING; ACCELERATION; AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SHOE;

ACCELERATION; AGED; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; POSTURE; SHOES; STROKE; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; WALKING;

EID: 84859756534     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: 19455119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1806-746     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update. A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46-e215.
2. Kelly-Hayes M, Beiser A, Kase CS, Scaramucci A, D'Agostino RB, Wolf PA. The infl uence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: the Framingham study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;12:119-126.
3. Shaughnessy M, Michael KM, Sorkin JD, Macko RF. Steps after stroke: capturing ambulatory recovery. Stroke. 2005;36:1305-1307.
4. Ivey FM, Macko RF, Ryan AS, Hafer-Macko CE. Cardiovascular health and fitness after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12:1-16.
5. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:234-239.
6. Andrews K, Stewart J. Stroke recovery: He can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979;18:43-48.
7. Lord S, Rochester L. Gait velocity and community ambulation: the limits of assessment. Stroke. 2008;39:reply e76.
8. Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke. 2005;36:1457-1461.
9. de Niet M, Bussmann JB, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ. The stroke upper-limb activity monitor: its sensitivity to measure hemiplegic upper-limb activity during daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1121-1126.
10. Chen KY, Bassett DR, Jr. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:S490- 500.
11. Uswatte G, Miltner WH, Foo B, Varma M, Moran S, Taub E. Objective measurement of functional upper-extremity movement using accelerometer recordings transformed with a threshold filter. Stroke. 2000;31:662-667.
12. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, Wolf SL. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1340-1345.
13. Uswatte G, Foo WL, Olmstead H, Lopez K, Holand A, Simms LB. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1498-1501.
14. Schasfoort FC, Bussmann JB, Martens WL, Stam HJ. Objective measurement of upper limb activity and mobility during everyday behavior using ambulatory accelerometry: the upper limb activity monitor. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38:439-446.
15. Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Forrester LW, Coleman KL, Macko RF. Accelerometer monitoring of home- and community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1997-2001.
16. Macko RF, Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, et al. Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:394-399.
17. Michael KM, Allen JK, Macko RF. Reduced ambulatory activity after stroke: the role of balance, gait, and cardiovascular fitness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1552-1556.
18. Mizuike C, Ohgi S, Morita S. Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer. Gait Posture. 2009;30:60-64.
19. Lau H-y, Tong K-y, Zhu H. Support vector machine for classification of walking conditions of persons after stroke with dropped foot. Hum Movement Sci. 2009;28:504-514.
20. Saremi K, Marehbian J, Yan X, et al. Reliability and validity of bilateral thigh and foot accelerometry measures of walking in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. 2006;20:297-305.
21. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang P-F, Jeng J-S, Hung C. How active are people with stroke?: Use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke. 2009;40:163-168.
22. Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP. Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:288-297.
23. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:27-32.
24. Lucca LF, Castelli E, Sannita WG. An estimated 30-60% of adult patients after stroke do not achieve satisfactory motor recovery of the upper limb despite intensive rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:953-953.
25. Sazonov ES, Fulk G, Sazonova N, Schuckers S. Automatic recognition of postures and activities in stroke patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;1:2200-2203.
26. Sazonov E, Bumpus T, Zeigler S, Marocco S. Identification of gait types from plantar pressure and heel acceleration data. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks; 2005; Montreal.
27. Sazonov E, Krishnamurthy V, Makeyev O, Ray B, Hill J, Schutz Y. Automatic recognition of postural allocations. Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Lyon, France; 2007:4993-4996.
28. Hamilton MT, Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Zderic TW, Owen N. Too little exercise and too much sitting: inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Curr Cardiovac Risk Rep. 2008;2:292-298.
29. Sazonov ES, Fulk G, Hill J, Schutz Y, Browning R. Monitoring of posture allocations and activities by a shoe-based wearable sensor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011;58:983-990.
30. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88:559-566.
31. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73:447-454.
32. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
33. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950-963.
34. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131-2140.
35. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Bode RK, Perera S, DeRosa J. Stroke Impact Scale-16: a brief assessment of physical function. Neurology. 2003;60:291-296.
36. Alpaydin E. Introduction to Machine Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2004.
37. Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
38. Devijver PA, Kittler J. Pattern Recognition: A Statistical Approach. London: Prentice-Hall; 1982.
39. Aminian K, Robert P, Buchser EE, Rutschmann B, Hayoz D, Depairon M. Physical activity monitoring based on accelerometry: validation and comparison with video observation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999;37:304-308.
40. Foerster F, Smeja M, Fahrenberg J. Detection of posture and motion by accelerometry: a validation in ambulatory monitoring. Comput Human Behav. 1999;15:571-583.
41. Mantyjarvi J, Himberg J, Seppanen T. Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. Conf Proc IEEE Int Conf Syst Man Cybern. 2001;2:747-752.
42. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2296-2304.
43. Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraintinduced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42:257-268.
44. Taub E, Uswatte G, Pidikiti R. Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation-a clinical review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1999;36:237-251.