The influence of gender and age on disability following ischemic stroke: The Framingham study

Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 119-126

  Kelly Hayes, Margaret ^a   Beiser, Alexa ^b   Kase, Carlos S ^a   Scaramucci, Amy ^b   D'Agostino, Ralph B ^c   Wolf, Philip A ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Boston University   (United States)

Author keywords

Disability evaluation; Gender; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGING; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONALIZATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NURSING HOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL; WALKING;

EID: 0037827345     PISSN: 10523057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1052-3057(03)00042-9     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. American Heart Association. 2002. Heart and Stroke Statistical Update. Dallas, TX, American Heart Association, 2001.
2. Gresham GE, Duncan PW, Stason WB, et al. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline. No. 16. Rockville, MD, US Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, May 1995, No. 95-0662.
3. Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke: Part I: Outcome: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:399-405.
4. Barker WH, Mullooly JP. Stroke in a defined elderly population, 1967-1985: A less lethal and disabling but no less common disease. Stroke 1997;28:284-290.
5. Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad JB. Prevalence of stroke and stroke-related disability. Estimates from the Auckland stroke studies. Stroke 1997;28:1898-1902.
6. Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, et al. Prevalence of stroke related disability estimates from The Framingham Study. Neurology 1998;50:A55-A56.
7. Thom TJ. Stroke mortality trends: An international perspective. Ann Epidemiol 1993;3:509-518.
8. Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, O'Neal MA, et al. Secular trends in stroke incidence and mortality: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1992;23:1551-1555.
9. Bonita R, Broad JB, Beaglehole R. Changes in stroke incidence and case-fatality in Auckland, New Zealand, 1981-91. Lancet 1993;342:1470-1473.
10. Kinsella K, Velkoff VA. An aging world: 2001. Washington, DC, US Bureau of Census, US Government Printing Office, 2001, 1-183 Series P95/01-1.
11. D'Agostino RB, Kannel WB. Epidemiological background and design: The Framingham Study: Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Sesquicentennial Invited Paper Sessions. Alexandria, VA, American Statistical Association, 1989.
12. Pinsky JL, Branch LG, Jette AM, et al. Framingham Disability Study: Relationship of disability to cardiovascular risk factors among persons free of diagnosed cardiovascular disease. Am J Epidemiol 1985;122:644-656.
13. Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, et al. The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 1994;84:351-358.
14. Allaire SH, LaValley MP, Evans SR, et al. Evidence for decline in disability and improved health among persons aged 55 to 70 years: The Framingham Heart Study. Am J Public Health 1999;89:1678-1683.
15. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS, et al. Time course of functional recovery after stroke: The Framingham Study. J Neurol Rehabil 1989;3:65-70.
16. Dombovy ML, Basford JR, Whisnant JP, et al. Disability and use of rehabilitation services following stroke in Rochester, Minnesota, 1975-1979. Stroke 1987;18:830-836.
17. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1983;46:5-8.
18. Branch LG, Jette AM. The Framingham Disability Study: I: Social disability among the aging. Am J Public Health 1981;71:1202-1210.
19. Jette AM, Branch LG. The Framingham Disability Study: II: Physical disability among the aging. Am J Public Health 1981;71:1211-1216.
20. Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, et al. Residual disability in survivors of stroke: The Framingham Study. N Engl J Med 1975;293:954-956.
21. Jette AM, Pinsky JL, Branch LG, et al. The Framingham Disability Study: Physical disability among community-dwelling survivors of stroke. J Clin Epidemiol 1988;41:719-726.
22. Mahoney FI, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md Med 1965;14:56-61.
23. Sulter G, Steen C, De Keyser J. Use of the Barthel index and modified Rankin scale in acute stroke trials. Stroke 1999;30:1538-1541.
24. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: A standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:64-67.
25. Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS, et al. Reliability of the Activities of Daily Living Scale and its use in telephone interviews. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;68:723-728.
26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state:" A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-198.
27. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. J Appl Psychol Meas 1977;1:385-401.
28. Kase CS, Wolf PA, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Intellectual decline after stroke: The Framingham Study. Stroke 1998;29:805-812.
29. Shinar D, Gross CR, Price TR, et al. Screening for depression in stroke patients: The reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. Stroke 1986;17:241-245.
30. Fried LP, Gulalnik JM. Disability in older adults: evidence regarding significance, etiology, and risk. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:92-100.
31. Murray CJL, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997;349:1498-1504.
32. Jørgensen HS, Reith J, Nakayama H, et al. What determines good recovery in patients with the most severe strokes? The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1999;30:2008-2012.
33. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. The influence of age on stroke outcome: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994;25:808-813.
34. Brown Jr RD, Ransom J, Hass S, et al. Use of nursing home after stroke and dependence on stroke severity: a population-based analysis. Stroke 1999;30:924-929.
35. Lai SM, Alter M, Friday G, et al. Disposition after acute stroke: Who is not sent home from hospital? Neuroepidemiology 1998;17:21-29.
36. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986;17:765-776.
37. Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Weinberger M, et al. Health status of individuals with mild stroke. Stroke 1997;28:740-745.
38. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kannel WB, et al. Factors influencing survival and need for institutionalization following stroke: The Framingham Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988;69:415-418.
39. Dunlop DD, Hughes SL, Manheim LM. Disability in activities of daily living: patterns of change and a hierarchy of disability. Am J Public Health 1997;87:378-383.
40. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Vataja R, et al. Comparison of stroke features and disability in daily life in patients with ischemic stroke aged 55 to 70 and 71 to 85 years. Stroke 1997;28:729-735.
41. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 1980.
42. World Health Organization. ICIDH-2: International classification of functioning and disability, Beta-2 Draft, Short Version. Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 1999.