Coronary perfusion: Impact of flow dynamics and geometric design of 2 different aortic prostheses of similar size

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 143, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1030-1035

  Mannacio, Vito ^a   Di Tommaso, Luigi ^a   De Amicis, Vincenzo ^a   Stassano, Paolo ^a   Vosa, Carlo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE;

ADULT; AORTA FLOW; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY FLOW RESERVE; DIASTOLE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE DIASTOLIC TIME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION TIME; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART RATE; HEART SCINTISCANNING; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REST; SAINT JUDE HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYSTOLE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADENOSINE; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY CIRCULATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; ITALY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84859750849     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Camici PG, Bellenger NG, Pennell DJ, Sheridan DJ. Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2003;107:3170-5. (Pubitemid 36793087)
2. Miyagawa S, Masai T, Fukuda H, Yamauchi T, Iwakura K, Itoh H, et al. Coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in aortic stenosis: myocardial contrast echocardiography study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:715-9.
3. Hildick-Smith DJ, Shapiro LM. Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1889-96.
4. Nemes A, Forster T, Kovács Z, Csanády M. Is the coronary flow velocity reserve improvement after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis transient? Results of a 3-year follow-up. Heart Vessels. 2006;21:157-61.
5. Tasca G, Brunelli F, Cirillo M, DallaTomba M, Mhagna Z, Troise G, et al. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on left ventricular mass regression following aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:505-10. (Pubitemid 40186547)
6. Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: the evidence continues to accumulate. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:952-5.
7. Ruel M, Al-Faleh H, Kulik A, Chan KL, Mesana TG, Burwash IG. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: impact on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131:1036-44.
8. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Armstrong S, Ivanov J, Rakowski H. Late hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:146-54.
9. Kleine P, Scherer M, Abdel-Rahman U, Klesius AA, Ackermann H, Moritz A. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:925-32. (Pubitemid 35253240)
10. van't Veer M, van Straten B, vande Vosse F, Pijls N. Influence of orientation of bi-leaflet valve prostheses on coronary perfusion pressure in humans. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6:588-92.
11. Hashimoto K. Patient-prosthesis mismatch: the Japanese experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;12:159-65.
12. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by twodimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:358-67.
13. Levy D, Savage DD, Garrison RJ, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Castelli WP. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59:956-60. (Pubitemid 17074242)
14. Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, Wittlinger T, Doss M, Ackermann H, et al. Stentless bioprostheses improve postoperative coronary flow more than stented prostheses after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:883-8.
15. Bakhtiary F, Schiemann M, Dzemali O, Dogan S, Schächinger V, Ackermann H, et al. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch and aortic valve design on coronary flow reserve after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:790-6. (Pubitemid 46240712)
16. Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:1058-64.
17. Bottio T, Caprili L, Casarotto D, Gerosa G. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available bileaflet mechanical valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:457-62. (Pubitemid 39194705)
18. Bombardini T, Gemignani V, Bianchini E, Venneri L, Petersen C, Pasanisi E, et al. Diastolic time-frequency relation in the stress echo lab: filling timing and flow at different heart rates. Cardiovascular Ultrasound. 2008;6:15.
19. Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, Lim KH, Rice NT, Goetz W, et al. A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 22:497-503. (Pubitemid 35286928)