A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 189, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 877-897

  Crossley, David ^a   de Linage, Caroline ^b   Hinderer, Jacques ^c   Boy, Jean Paul ^c,d   Famiglietti, James ^b  

^a Saint Louis University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^d NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Satellite gravity; Time series analysis; Time variable gravity

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL EUROPE; EMPIRICAL ORTHOGONAL FUNCTION DECOMPOSITIONS; FIRST-PRINCIPLES; GAUSSIAN WINDOW; GLOBAL GEODYNAMICS PROJECTS; GRAVITY EFFECTS; GRAVITY FIELD; GRAVITY RESPONSE; GROUND SURFACES; HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; LENGTH SCALE; RESIDUAL GRAVITY; SATELLITE GRAVITY; SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS; SEASONAL VARIATION; SUPERCONDUCTING GRAVIMETER; TIME-VARIABLE GRAVITY; VARIANCE REDUCTIONS; WATER MASS DISTRIBUTIONS;

GRAVIMETERS; HYDROLOGY; MICROCOMPUTERS; SAILING VESSELS; SOIL MOISTURE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

GEODETIC SATELLITES;

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GEODYNAMICS; GRACE; GRAVIMETRY; GRAVITY FIELD; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SEASONAL VARIATION; SOIL MOISTURE; SUPERCONDUCTIVITY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WATER MASS;

CENTRAL EUROPE;

EID: 84859720488     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05404.x     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Abe, M., Kroner, C., Neumeyer, J. & Chen, X.D., 2010. Assessment of atmospheric reductions for terrestrial gravity observations, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 146, 11817-11838.
2. Andersen, O., Seneviratne, S.I., Hinderer, J. & Viterbo, P., 2005. GRACE-derived terrestrial water storage depletion associated with the 2003 European heat wave, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L18405, doi:.
3. Bettadpur, S., 2007. CSR Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Product Release 04, GRACE 327-742, The GRACE Project, Cent. for Space Res., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX. Available at.
4. Biancale, R. et al., 2010. 7 Years of Gravity Variations from GRACE and LAGEOS Data From CNES/GRGS. Available at: (last accessed 2012 March 10).
5. Boronina, A. & Ramillien, G., 2008. Application of AVHRR imagery and GRACE measurements for calculation of actual evapotranspiration over the Quaternary aquifer (Lake Chad basin) and validation of groundwater models, J. Hydrol., 348, 98-109.
6. Bower, D.R. & Courtier, N., 1998. Precipitation effects on gravity measurements at the Canadian Absolute Gravity Site, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 106(3-4), 353-369.
7. Boy, J.-P. & Chao, B., 2005. Precise evaluation of atmospheric loading effects on Earths time-variable gravity field, J. geophys. Res., 110, B08412, doi:.
8. Boy, J.-P. & Hinderer, J., 2006. Study of the seasonal gravity signal in superconducting gravimeter data, J. Geodyn., 41, 227-233.
9. Boy, J.-P. & Lyard, F., 2008. High-frequency non-tidal ocean loading effects on surface gravity measurements, Geophys. J. Int., 175, 35-45.
10. Boy, J.-P., Gegout, P. & Hinderer, J., 2002. Reduction of surface gravity data from global atmospheric pressure loading, Geophys. J. Int., 149, 534-545.
11. Boy, J.-P., Longuevergne, L., Boudine, F., Jacob, T., Lyard, F., Llubes, M., Florsch, N. & Esnoult, M.-F., 2009. Modelling atmospheric and induced non-tidal oceanic loading contributions to surface gravity and tilt measurements, J. Geodyn., 48, 182-188.
12. Bruinsma, S., Lemoine, J.-M., Biancale, R. & Vales, N., 2010. CNES/GRGS 10-day gravity field models (release 2) and their evaluation, Adv. Space Res., 45, 587-601.
13. Carrère, L. & Lyard, F., 2003. Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing: comparison with observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6), 1275, doi:.
14. Chen, X., Ducarme, B., Sun, H.P. & Xua, J., 2008. Loading effect of a self-consistent equilibrium ocean pole tide on the gravimetric parameters of the gravity pole tides at superconducting gravimeter stations, J. Geodyn., 45, 201-207.
15. Chen, X., Kroner, C., Sun, H.-P., Abe, M., Zhou, J., Yana, H. & Wziontek, H., 2009. Determination of gravimetric parameters of the gravity pole tide using observations recorded with superconducting gravimeters, J. Geodyn., 48, 348-353.
16. Creutzfeldt, B., Güntner, A., Klügel, T. & Wziontek, H., 2008. Simulating the influence of water storage changes on the superconducting gravimeter of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell. Germany, Geophysics, 73(6), WA95-WA104.
17. Creutzfeldt, B., Güntner, A., Thoss, H., Merz, B. & Wziontek, H., 2010a. Measuring the effect of local water storage changes on in-situ gravity observations: case study of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany, Water Resour. Res., 46, W08531, doi:.
18. Creutzfeldt, B., Güntner, A., Wziontek, H. & Merz, B., 2010b. Reducing local hydrology from high-precision gravity measurements: a lysimeter-based approach, Geophys. J. Int., 183(1), 178-187.
19. Crossley, D. & Hinderer, J., 2009. A review of the GGP network and scientific challenges, J. Geodyn., 48, 299-304.
20. Crossley, D., Hinderer, J., Llubes, M. & Florsch, N, 2003. The potential of ground gravity measurements to validate GRACE data, Adv. Geosci., 1, 65-71.
21. Crossley, D., Hinderer, J. & Boy, J.-P., 2004. Regional gravity variations in Europe from superconducting gravimeters, J. Geodyn., 38, 325-342.
22. Crossley, D., Hinderer, J. & Boy, J.-P., 2005. Time variation of the European gravity field from superconducting gravimeters, Geophys. J. Int., 161, 257-264.
23. Crossley, D., Hinderer, J., Boy, J.-P. & de Linage, C., 2006. Status of the GGP Satellite project, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 142, 11423-11432.
24. Dee, D.P. et al., 2011. The ERA Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137, 553-597.
25. Dehant, V., 1987. Tidal Parameters for an inelastic Earth, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 49, 97-116.
26. Döll, P., Kaspar, F. & Lehner, B., 2003. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation, J. Hydrol., 270, 105-134.
27. Eanes, R., 2002. The CSR4.0 Global Ocean Tide Model. Available at: (last accessed 2012 March 10).
28. Farrell, W.E., 1972. Deformation of the Earth by surface loads, Rev. Geophys., 10, 761-797.
29. Fletchner, F., 2007. AOD1B Product Description Document for Product Releases 01 to 04, GRACE 327-750, CSR publ. GR-GFZ-AOD-0001 Rev. 3.1, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 43pp. Available at: (last accessed 2012 March 11).
30. Han, S.-C., Shum, C.K., Jekeli, C., Kuo, C.-Y., Wilson, C. & Seo, K.-W., 2005. Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancement, Geophys. J. Int., 163(1), 18-25.
31. Hasan, S., Troch, P.A., Bogaart, P.W. & Kroner, C., 2008. Evaluating catchment-scale hydrological modeling by means of terrestrial gravity observations, Water Resour. Res., 44(8), W08416, doi:.
32. Hinderer, J., Rosat, S., Crossley, D., Amalvict, M., Boy, J.-P. & Gegout, P., 2002. Influence of different processing methods on the retrieval of gravity signals from GGP data, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 135, 10653-10668.
33. Hinderer, J., Andersen, O., Lemoine, F., Crossley, D. & Boy, J.-P., 2006. Seasonal changes in the European gravity field from GRACE: a comparison with superconducting gravimeters and hydrology model predictions, J. Geodyn., 41, 59-68.
34. Hinderer, J., Crossley, D. & Warburton, R.J., 2007. Superconducting gravimetry, in Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 3, pp. 65-122, eds Herring, T. & Schubert, G., Elsevier, New York, NY.
35. Hokkanen, T., Korhonen, K. & Virtanen, H., 2006. Hydrogeological effects on superconducting gravimeter measurements at Metsähovi in Finland, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 11(4), 261-267, doi:.
36. Jacob, T., Bayer, R., Chery, J., Jourde, H. & Moigne, N.L., 2010. Time-lase microgravity surveys reveal water storage heterogeneity of a karst aquifer, J. geophys. Res., 115, B06402, doi:.
37. Jekeli, C., 1981. Alternative methods to smooth the Earths gravity field, Report #327, Dept. Geod. and Sci. and Surv., Ohio State University.
38. Kanzow, T., Flechtner, F., Chave, A., Schmidt, R., Schwintzer, P. & Send, U., 2005. Seasonal variation of ocean bottom pressure derived from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE): local validation and global patterns, J. geophys. Res., 110, C09001, doi:.
39. Klügel, T. & Wziontek, H., 2009. Correcting gravimeters and tiltmeters for atmospheric mass attraction using operational weather models, J. Geodyn., 48(3-5), 204-210.
40. Kroner, C. & Jahr, T., 2006. Hydrological experiments around the superconducting gravimeter at Moxa Observatory, J. Geodyn., 41, 268-275.
41. Kroner, C., Dierks, O., Neumeyer, J. & Wilmes, H., 2005. Analysis of observations with dual sensor superconducting gravimeters, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 153, 210-219.
42. Kroner, C., Jahr, T., Naujoks, M. & Weise, A., 2007. Hydrological signals in gravity foe or friend? In IAG Symposia Dynamic Planet, Vol. 130, pp. 504-510, Springer, Berlin.
43. Kroner, C., Thomas, M., Dobslaw, H., Abe, M. & Weise, A., 2009. Seasonal effects of non-tidal oceanic mass shifts in observations with superconducting gravimeters, J. Geodyn., 48, 354-359.
44. Lambert, A., Henton, J. & Winester, D., 2009. GRACE monthly estimates compared with surface gravity variations at mid-North American Sites, Paper Presented at NOAA Workshop: Monitoring NA Geoid Change, Boulder, CO, 2009 October.
45. de Linage, C., 2008. Mésures gravimétriques au sol et satellitaires: étude du rapport entre variation de pesanteur et déplacement vertical et apport de la mission spatiale GRACE à l'étude des surcharges hydrologiques et des très grand séismes, PhD thesis, Univ. Louis Pasteur Strasbourg, Strasbourg. Available at: (last accessed 2012 March 11).
46. de Linage, C., Hinderer, J. & Rogister, Y., 2007. A search for the ratio between gravity variation and vertical displacement due to a surface load, Geophys. J. Int., 171, 986-994.
47. de Linage, C., Hinderer, J. & Boy, J.-P., 2009. Variability of the gravity-to-height ratio due to surface loads, Pure appl. Geophys., 166, 1217-1245.
48. Llubes, M., Florsch, N., Hinderer, J., Longueverne, L. & Amalvict, M., 2004. Local hydrology, Global Geodynamics Project and CHAMP/GRACE/GOCE perspectives: some case studies, J. Geod., 38, 355-374.
49. Longuevergne, L., 2008. Contribution à l'hydrogeodésie. Ph.D. thesis, UPMC University Paris 6, 300 pp.
50. Longuevergne, L., Boy, J.-P., Florsch, N., Viville, D., Ferhat, G., Ulrich, P., Luck, B. & Hinderer, J., 2009. Local and global hydrological contributions to gravity variations observed in Strasbourg (France), J. Geodyn., 48, doi:.
51. Longuevergne, L., Scanlon, B. & Wilson, C., 2010. GRACE Hydrological estimates for small basins: evaluating processing approaches on the High Plains Aquifer, USA, Water Resour., Res., 46, W11517, doi:.
52. Lyard, F., Lefevre, F., Letellier, T. & Francis, O., 2006. Modelling the global ocean tides: insights from FES2004, Ocean Dyn., 56, 394-415.
53. Meurers, B., 2010. Environmental effects on gravity at Conrad Observatory, Austria, Geophys. Res. Abs., 12, EGU2010-3656.
54. Milly, P.C.D. & Shmakin, A.B., 2002a. Global modeling of land water and energy balances, part I: the land dynamics (LaD) model, J. Hydromet., 3, 283-299.
55. Milly, P.C.D. & Shmakin, A.B., 2002b. Global modeling of land water and energy balances, part II: land characteristic contributions to spatial variability, J. Hydromet., 3, 301-310.
56. Naujoks, M., Weise, A., Kroner, C. & Jahr, T., 2008. Detection of small hydrological variations in gravity by repeated observations with relative gravimeters, J. Geod., 82, 543-553.
57. Naujoks, M., Kroner, C., Weise, A., Jahr, T., Krause, P. & Eisner, S., 2010. Evaluating local hydrological modelling by temporal gravity observations and a gravimetric 3D model, Geophys. J. Int., 182, 233-249.
58. Neumeyer, J., Hagedoorn, J., Leitloff, J. & Schmidt, R., 2004. Gravity reduction with three-dimensional atmospheric pressure data for precise ground gravity measurements, J. Geodyn., 38, 437-450.
59. Neumeyer, J. et al., 2006. Combination of temporal gravity variations resulting from Superconducting Gravimeter (SG) recordings, GRACE satellite observations and global hydrology models, J. Geod., 79, 573-585, doi:.
60. Neumeyer, J., Barthelmes, F., Kroner, C., Petrovic, S., Schmidt, R., Virtanen, H. & Wilmes, H., 2008. Analysis of gravity field variations derived from superconducting gravimeter recordings, the GRACE satellite and hydrological models at selected European sites, Earth Planets Space, 60, 505-518.
61. Park, J.-H., Watts, D.R., Donohues, K.A. & Jayne, S.R., 2008. A comparison of in situ bottom pressure array measurements with GRACE estimetes in the Kuroshio Extension, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L17601, doi:.
62. Pfeffer, J. et al., 2011. Local and global hydrological contributions to time-variable gravity in Southwest Niger, Geophys. J. Int., 184, 661-672, doi:.
63. Pierce, D., 2003. Empirical Orthogonal Function (EOF) Software, Climate Research Division, Scripps Institute of Oceanography. Available at: (last accessed 2012 March 11).
64. Pálinkás, V., 2009. Modelling hydrological effects on gravity, Geophys. Res. Abs., 11, EGU2009-11634.
65. Riccardi, U., Rosat, S. & Hinderer, J., 2011. Comparison of the Micro-g LaCoste gPhone-054 spring gravimeter and the GWR-C026 superconducting gravimeter in Strasbourg (France) using a 300-day time series, Metrologia, 48, 28-39.
66. Rietbroek, R., Brunnabend, S.-E., Dahle, C., Kusche, J., Flechtner, F., Schröter, J. & Timmermann, R., 2009. Changes in total ocean mass derived from GRACE, GPS, and ocean modeling with weekly resolution, J. geophys. Res., 114, C11004, doi:.
67. Rodell, M. et al., 2004. The global land data assimilation system, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., 85(3), 381-394. [Available online at].
68. Rosat, S., Boy, J.-P., Ferhat, G., Hinderer, J., Amalvict, M., Gegout, P. & Luck, B., 2009. Analysis of a 10-year (19972007) record of time-varying gravity in Strasbourg using absolute and superconducting gravimeters: new results on the calibration and comparison with GPS height changes and hydrology, J. Geodyn., 48, 360-365.
69. Savage, J.C. & Svarc, J.L., 2009. Postseismic relaxation following the 1992 M7.3 Landers and 1999 M7.1 Hector Mine earthquakes, southern California, J. geophys. Res., 114, B01401, doi:.
70. Seitz, F., Schmidt, M. & Shum, C.K., 2008. Signals of extreme weather conditions in Central Europe in GRACE 4-D hydrological mass variations, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 268, 165-170.
71. Seo, K.-W. & Wilson, C.R., 2005. Estimating GRACE aliasing errors, in IAG Symposia: Gravity, Geoid, and Space Missions, Vol. 129, 339-345, eds Jekeli, C., Bastos, L.M.C. & Fernandez, J., Springer, Berlin.
72. Simon, D., 2002. Modeling of the field of gravity variations induced by the seasonal air mass warming during 1998-2000, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 136, 10821-10836.
73. Simon, D., 2006. Gravimetric effects induced by vertical air mass shifts at Medicina (1998-2005), Wettzell, Bad Homburg, Moxa, Pecny and Wien (1998-2004), Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 142, 11317-11322.
74. Swenson, S. & Wahr, J., 2006. Postprocessing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L08402, doi:.
75. Swenson, S., Wahr, J. & Milly, P.C.D., 2003. Estimated accuracies of regional water storage variations inferred from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), Water Resour. Res., 39(8), 1223, doi:.
76. Swenson, S.C., Yeh, P.J.-F., Wahr, J. & Famiglietti, J.S., 2006. A comparison of terrestrial water storage variations from GRACE with in situ measurements from Illinois, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16401, doi:.
77. Swenson, S., Famiglietti, J., Basara, J. & Wahr, J., 2008. Estimating profile soil moisture and groundwater variations using GRACE and Oklahoma Mesonet soil moisture data, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01413, 1-12, doi:.
78. Tamura, Y., 1987. A harmonic development of the tide generating potential, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 99, 6813-6855.
79. Tamura, Y., Sato, T., Ooe, M. & Ishiguro, M., 1991. A procedure for tidal analysis with a Bayesian information criterion, Geophys. J. Int., 104, 507-516.
80. Teuling, A.J. et al., 2010. Contrasting response of European forest and grassland energy exchange to heatwaves, Nat. Geosci., 3, 722-727.
81. Van Camp, M., Williams, S.D.P. & Francis, O., 2005. Uncertainty of absolute gravity measurements, J. geophys. Res., 110, B05406, doi:.
82. Van Camp, M., Vanclooster, M., Crommen, O., Petermans, T., Verbeeck, K., Meurers, B., van Dam, T. & Dassargues, A., 2006. Hydrogeological investigations at the Membach station, Belgium, and application to correct long periodic gravity variations, J. geophys. Res., 111, B10403, doi:.
83. Velicogna, I. & Wahr, J., 2001. Potential problems with the use of gravimeter data for GRACE Cal/Val, EOS, Trans. Am. geophys. Un., 82(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract G51A-0242.
84. Virtanen, H., 2004. Loading effects in Metsahovi from the atmosphere and the Baltic Sea, J. Geodyn., 38, 407-422.
85. Virtanen, H. & Makinen, J., 2003. The effect of the Baltic Sea level on gravity at the Metsahovi station, J. Geodyn., 35, 553-565.
86. Virtanen, H., Tervo, M. & Bilker-Koivula, M., 2006. Comparison of superconducting gravimeter observations with hydrological models of various spatial extents, Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terrestres, 142, 11361-11368.
87. Wahr, J., Molenaar, M. & Bryan, F., 1998. Time-variability of the Earths gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE, J. geophys. Res., 103, 30205-30230.
88. Wahr, J., Swenson, S., Zlotnicki, V. & Velicogna, I., 2004. Time-variable gravity from GRACE: first results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(11), L11501, doi:.
89. Wahr, J., Swenson, S. & Velicogna, I., 2006. Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L06401, doi:.
90. Wang, X., de Linage, C., Famiglietti, J.S. & Zender, C., 2011. Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) detection of water storage changes in the Three Gorges Reservoir of China and comparison with in situ measurements, Water Resour. Res., 47, W12502, doi:.
91. Warburton, R.J. & Goodkind, J.M., 1977. The influence of barometric-pressure variations on gravity, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 48, 281-292.
92. Weise, A., Kroner, C., Abe, M., Ihde, J., Jentzsch, G., Naujoks, M., Wilmes, H. & Wziontek, H., 2009. Gravity field variations from superconducting gravimeters for GRACE validation, J. Geodyn., 48, 325-330.
93. Wenzel, H.G., 1996. The nanogal software: earth tide data processing package: ETERNA 3.3, Bull. dInf. Marées Terrestres, 124, 9425-9439.
94. Widmer-Schnidrig, R., Duffner, P., Forbriger, Th. & Zurn, W., 2010. The new dual sphere superconducting gravimeter at the Black Forest Observatory, Abstract GG P02, p.64, German Geophysical Society Meeting, Bochum, Germany, March 2010.
95. Wilkes, D.S., 1995. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, Chapter 9, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
96. Wziontek, H., Falk, R., Wilmes, H. & Wolf, P., 2009a. Precise gravity time series and instrumental properties from combination of superconducting and absolute gravity measurements, in Observing our Changing Earth, pp. 301-306, ed. Sideris, M.G., Springer, Berlin.
97. Wziontek, H., Wilmes, H., Wolf, P., Werth, S. & Güntner, A., 2009b. Time series of superconducting gravimeters and water storage variations from the global hydrology model WGHM, J. Geodyn., 48(3-5), 166-171.
98. Zerbini, S., Richter, B., Negusini, M., Romagnoli, C., Simon, D., Domenichini, F. & Schwahn, W., 2001. Height and gravity various by continuous GPS, gravity and environmental parameter observations in the southern Po Plain, near Bologna, Italy, Earth planet. Sci. Lett., 192, 267-279.
99. Zerbini, S., Richter, B., Rocca, F., van Dam, T. & Matonti, F., 2007. A combination of space and terrestrial geodetic techniques to monitor land subsidence: case study, the Southeastern Po Plain, Italy, J. geophys. Res., 112, B05401, doi:.