Determination of gravimetric parameters of the gravity pole tide using observations recorded with superconducting gravimeters

Journal of Geodynamics

Volumn 48, Issue 3-5, 2009, Pages 348-353

  Chen, Xiaodong ^a,b,c   Kroner, Corinna ^c   Sun, Heping ^a   Abe, Maiko ^c   Zhou, Jiangcun ^a,b   Yan, Haoming ^a   Wziontek, Hartmut ^c  

^a Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Atmospheric reduction; Gravity pole tide; Hydrological reduction; Superconducting gravimeter

Indexed keywords

AIR MASS; DATA ASSIMILATION; GRAVIMETRY; GRAVITY FIELD; GRAVITY SURVEY; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; OCEAN TIDE; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 72149134494     PISSN: 02643707     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Boy J.P., and Hinderer J. Study of the seasonal gravity signal in by superconducting gravimeter data. J. Geodyn. 41 1-3 (2006) 227-233
2. Boy J.P., Hinderer J., and Gegout P. Global atmospheric loading and gravity. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 109 (1998) 161-177
3. Chen X.-D., Ducarme B., and Sun H.-P. Influence of the equilibrium ocean pole tide on the gravity field. Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terr. 143 (2006) 11443-11450
4. Chen X.-D., Ducarme B., Sun H.-P., et al. Loading effect of a self-consistent equilibrium ocean pole tide on the gravimetric parameters of the gravity pole tides at superconducting gravimeter stations. J. Geodyn. 45 (2008) 201-207
5. Crossley D., Hinderer J., and Boy J.P. Time variation of the European gravity field from superconducting gravimeters. Geo. J. Int. 161 2 (2005) 257-264
6. Crossley D., Hinderer J., Casula G., et al. Network of superconducting gravimeters benefits a number of disciplines. AGU 80 (1999) 121-126
7. De Meyer F., and Ducarme B. Non-tidal gravity changes observed with a superconducting gravimeter. In: Kakkuri J. (Ed). Proc. 11th Int. Symp. on Earth Tides. Helsinki, Schweizerbastische Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart (1991) 531-554
8. Dehant V., Defraigne P., and Wahr J. Tides for a convective Earth. J. Geophys. Res. 104 B1 (1999) 1035-1058
9. Desai S. Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 107 C11 (2002) 3186 10.1029/2001JC001224
10. Ducarme B., Venedikov A.P., Arnoso J., et al. Global analysis of the GGP superconducting gravimeter network for the estimation of the pole tide gravimetric amplitude factor. J. Geodyn. 41 (2006) 334-344
11. Hartmann T., and Wenzel H.G. The HW95 tidal potential catalogue. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22 24 (1995) 3553-3556
12. Hu X.-G., Liu L.-T., Ducarme B., et al. Estimation of the pole tide gravimetric factor at the Chandler period through wavelet filtering. Geophys. J. Int. 169 (2007) 821-829
13. Kroner C., and Jentzsch G. Comparison of different barometric pressure reductions for gravity data and resulting consequences. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 115 (1999) 205-218
14. Loyer S., Hinderer J., and Boy J.P. Determination of the gravimetric factor at the Chandler period from Earth orientation data and superconducting gravimetry observations. Geophys. J. Int. 136 (1999) 1-7
15. Mahmoud A.E.G., Spiros P., and Ahmed E.R. Frequency-dependent atmospheric pressure admittance of superconducting gravimeter records using least squares response method. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 170 1-2 (2008) 24-33
16. Merriam J.B. Atmospheric pressure and gravity. Geophys. J. Int. 109 (1992) 488-500
17. Neumeyer J., Hagedoorn J., Leitloff J., et al. Gravity reduction with three-dimensional atmospheric pressure data for precise ground gravity measurements. J. Geodyn. 38 (2004) 437-450
18. Richter B., Wenzel H.G., Zürn W., et al. From Chandler wobble to free oscillation: comparison of cryogenic and other instrument in a wide period range. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 91 (1995) 131-148
19. Rodell M., Houser P.R., Jambor U., et al. The Global Land Data Assimilation System. Bull. Am. Meteor. Soc. 85 (2004) 381-394
20. Sun H.-P., Ducarme B., and Dehant V. Correction of the atmospheric pressure on gravity measurements recorded by a superconducting gravimeter at Brussels. In: Hsu H.T. (Ed). Proc. 12th Int. Symp. Earth Tides (1995), Science Press, Beijing 317-330
21. Van Dam T.M., Wahr J., Milly P.C.D., et al. Gravity changes due to continental water storage. J. Geodetic Soc. Jpn. 47 1 (2001) 249-254
22. Virtanen H., Tervo M., and Bilker-Koivula M. Comparison of superconducting gravimeter observations with hydrological models of various spatial extents. Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terr. 142 (2006) 11407-11416
23. Wahr J., Molenaar M., and Bryan F. Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. JGR 103 B12 (1998) 30205-30229
24. Wenzel H.G. The Nanogal Software: Earth Tide Data Processing Package Eterna3.30. Bull. d'Inf. Marées Terr. 124 (1996) 9425-9439
25. Xu J.-Q., Sun H.-P., and Yang X.-F. A study of gravity variations caused by polar motion using superconducting gravimeter data from the GGP network. J. Geodesy 78 (2004) 201-209
26. Zhou X.-H., Wu B., and Hsu H.-Z. Influence of water mass redistribution on gravity observations. Chin. J. Geophys. (Supplement, in Chinese) 45 (2002) 340-345