Comparison of relative cerebral blood flow maps using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and single photon emission computed tomography

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 779-786

  Liu, Peiying ^a   Uh, Jinsoo ^a   Devous, Michael D ^b   Adinoff, Bryon ^a,c   Lu, Hanzhang ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VA NORTH TEXAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Arterial spin labeling; Cerebral blood flow; Contrast agent; PCASL; Perfusion; SPECT

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; CONTRAST AGENT; PCASL; PERFUSION; SPECT;

BLOOD VESSELS; TISSUE;

SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRAY MATTER; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINETICS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSEUDO CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; BLOOD CIRCULATION TIME; BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; SPIN LABELS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 84859628004     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: 10991492     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1792     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA, Hyde JS. QUIPSS II with thin-slice TI1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41: 1246-1254.
2. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998; 208: 410-416.
3. Dai W, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous flow-driven inversion for arterial spin labeling using pulsed radio frequency and gradient fields. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 60: 1488-1497.
4. Wong EC. Vessel-encoded arterial spin-labeling using pseudocontinuous tagging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 58: 1086-1091.
5. Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, Koretsky AP. Perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1992; 23: 37-45.
6. Kim SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional mapping. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995; 34: 293-301.
7. Williams DS, Detre JA, Leigh JS, Koretsky AP. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1992; 89: 212-216.
8. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed. 1997; 10: 237-249.
9. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 702-708.
10. Trampel R, Mildner T, Goerke U, Schaefer A, Driesel W, Norris DG. Continuous arterial spin labeling using a local magnetic field gradient coil. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48: 543-546.
11. Fernandez-Seara MA, Aznarez-Sanado M, Mengual E, Loayza FR, Pastor MA. Continuous performance of a novel motor sequence leads to highly correlated striatal and hippocampal perfusion increases. Neuroimage 2009; 47: 1797-1808.
12. Lim J, Wu WC, Wang J, Detre JA, Dinges DF, Rao H. Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 3426-3435.
13. Jarnum H, Steffensen EG, Knutsson L, Frund ET, Simonsen CW, Lundbye-Christensen S, Shankaranarayanan A, Alsop DC, Jensen FT, Larsson EM. Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 2010; 52: 307-317.
14. Johnson NA, Jahng GH, Weiner MW, Miller BL, Chui HC, Jagust WJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Schuff N. Pattern of cerebral hypoperfusion in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment measured with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 2005; 234: 851-859.
15. Pfefferbaum A, Chanraud S, Pitel AL, Muller-Oehring E, Shankaranarayanan A, Alsop DC, Rohlfing T, Sullivan EV. Cerebral blood flow in posterior cortical nodes of the default mode network decreases with task engagement but remains higher than in most brain regions. Cereb. Cortex 2011; 21: 233-244.
16. Yezhuvath US, Uh J, Cheng Y, Martin-Cook K, Weiner M, Diaz-Arrastia R, van Osch M, Lu H. Forebrain-dominant deficit in cerebrovascular reactivity in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2010; DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.1002.1005.
17. Aslan S, Xu F, Wang PL, Uh J, Yezhuvath US, van Osch M, Lu H. Estimation of labeling efficiency in pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 63: 765-771.
18. Bonekamp D, Degaonkar M, Barker PB. Quantitative cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using total cerebral flow from phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011; 66: 57-66.
19. van Osch MJ, Teeuwisse WM, van Walderveen MA, Hendrikse J, Kies DA, van Buchem MA. Can arterial spin labeling detect white matter perfusion signal? Magn. Reson. Med. 2009; 62: 165-173.
20. Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1996; 16: 1236-1249.
21. Gonzalez-At JB, Alsop DC, Detre JA. Cerebral perfusion and arterial transit time changes during task activation determined with continuous arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 43: 739-746.
22. Ye FQ, Mattay VS, Jezzard P, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997; 37: 226-235.
23. Mildner T, Moller HE, Driesel W, Norris DG, Trampel R. Continuous arterial spin labeling at the human common carotid artery: the influence of transit times. NMR Biomed. 2005; 18: 19-23.
24. Liu P, Uh J, Lu H. Determination of spin compartment in arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011; 65: 120-127.
25. Parkes LM, Tofts PS. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48: 27-41.
26. Qiu M, Paul Maguire R, Arora J, Planeta-Wilson B, Weinzimmer D, Wang J, Wang Y, Kim H, Rajeevan N, Huang Y, Carson RE, Constable RT. Arterial transit time effects in pulsed arterial spin labeling CBF mapping: insight from a PET and MR study in normal human subjects. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 63: 374-384.
27. Koziak AM, Winter J, Lee TY, Thompson RT, St Lawrence KS. Validation study of a pulsed arterial spin labeling technique by comparison to perfusion computed tomography. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008; 26: 543-553.
28. Kimura H, Kabasawa H, Yonekura Y, Itoh H. Cerebral perfusion measurements using continuous arterial spin labeling: accuracy and limits of a quantitative approach. Int. Congr. Ser. 2004; 1265: 238-247.
29. Wu WC, Fernandez-Seara M, Detre JA, Wehrli FW, Wang J. A theoretical and experimental investigation of the tagging efficiency of pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007; 58: 1020-1027.
30. Luh WM, Wong EC, Bandettini PA. How long to tag? Optimal tag duration for arterial spin labeling at 1.5T, 3T, and 7T. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2008; 186.
31. Chalela JA, Alsop DC, Gonzalez-Atavales JB, Maldjian JA, Kasner SE, Detre JA. Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000; 31: 680-687.
32. Okell TW, Chappell MA, Woolrich MW, Gunther M, Feinberg DA, Jezzard P. Vessel-encoded dynamic magnetic resonance angiography using arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 64: 698-706.
33. Woolsey TA, Hanaway J, Gado MH. The Brain Atlas: A Visual Guide to the Human Central Nervous System, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ; 2003.
34. van Laar PJ, Hendrikse J, Golay X, Lu H, van Osch MJ, van der Grond J. Invivo flow territory mapping of major brain feeding arteries. Neuroimage 2006; 29: 136-144.
35. Hendrikse J, van der Grond J, Lu H, van Zijl PC, Golay X. Flow territory mapping of the cerebral arteries with regional perfusion MRI. Stroke 2004; 35: 882-887.
36. Adinoff B, Devous MD Sr., Williams MJ, Best SE, Harris TS, Minhajuddin A, Zielinski T, Cullum M. Altered neural cholinergic receptor systems in cocaine-addicted subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35: 1485-1499.
37. Di Rocco RJ, Silva DA, Kuczynski BL, Narra RK, Ramalingam K, Jurisson S, Nunn AD, Eckelman WC. The single-pass cerebral extraction and capillary permeability-surface area product of several putative cerebral blood flow imaging agents. J. Nucl. Med. 1993; 34: 641-648.
38. Murase K, Tanada S, Inoue T, Ochi K, Fujita H, Sakaki S, Kimura Y, Hamamoto K. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability of I-123 IMP, Tc-99m HMPAO and Tc-99m ECD in the human brain using compartment model analysis and dynamic SPECT. J. Nucl. Med. 1991; 32: 911.
39. Tsuchida T, Yonekura Y, Nishizawa S, Sadato N, Tamaki N, Fujita T, Magata Y, Konishi J. Nonlinearity correction of brain perfusion SPECT based on permeability-surface area product model. J. Nucl. Med. 1996; 37: 1237-1241.
40. Kuikka JT, Lansimies E, Kuikka EO. Quantitative analysis of 99mTc-HMPAO kinetics in epilepsy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1990; 16: 275-283.
41. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl PC. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 52: 679-682.
42. Uh J, Lin AL, Lee K, Liu P, Fox P, Lu H. Validation of VASO cerebral blood volume measurement with positron emission tomography. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 65: 744-749.
43. Hendrikse J, Petersen ET, van Laar PJ, Golay X. Cerebral border zones between distal end branches of intracranial arteries: MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 246: 572-580.
44. Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 40: 383-396.
45. Yang Y, Engelien W, Xu S, Gu H, Silbersweig DA, Stern E. Transit time, trailing time, and cerebral blood flow during brain activation: measurement using multislice, pulsed spin-labeling perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 680-685.
46. Hendrikse J, Lu H, van der Grond J, Van Zijl PC, Golay X. Measurements of cerebral perfusion and arterial hemodynamics during visual stimulation using TURBO-TILT. Magn. Reson. Med. 2003; 50: 429-433.
47. van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Duyn JH. Pitfalls of MRI measurement of white matter perfusion based on arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008; 59: 788-795.
48. Butman JA, Rebmann AJ, Talagala SL. Measurement of regional cervical-cerebral transit time at high temporal resolution using dynamic susceptibility contrast. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2002; 1076.
49. 15O-PET. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2005; 4: 27-34.
50. Ye FQ, Berman KF, Ellmore T, Esposito G, van Horn JD, Yang Y, Duyn J, Smith AM, Frank JA, Weinberger DR, McLaughlin AC. H(2)(15)O PET validation of steady-state arterial spin tagging cerebral blood flow measurements in humans. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 450-456.
51. Bokkers RP, Bremmer JP, van Berckel BN, Lammertsma AA, Hendrikse J, Pluim JP, Kappelle LJ, Boellaard R, Klijn CJ. Arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI at multiple delay times: a correlative study with H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2010; 30: 222-229.
52. Noguchi T, Kawashima M, Irie H, Ootsuka T, Nishihara M, Matsushima T, Kudo S. Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging in moyamoya disease compared with SPECT imaging. Eur. J. Radiol. 2011; DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.016.
53. 15O-water PET in elderly subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease. NMR Biomed. 2010; 23: 286-293.
54. Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, Listerud J, Gonzalez-At JB, Schnall MD, Detre JA. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 48: 242-254.
55. Petersen ET, Lim T, Golay X. Model-free arterial spin labeling quantification approach for perfusion MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2006; 55: 219-232.
56. Petersen ET, Mouridsen K, Golay X. The QUASAR reproducibility study, Part II: results from a multi-center arterial spin labeling test-retest study. Neuroimage 2010; 49: 104-113.
57. Zaharchuk G, Straka M, Marks MP, Albers GW, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Combined arterial spin label and dynamic susceptibility contrast measurement of cerebral blood flow. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010; 63: 1548-1556.
58. Herscovitch P, Raichle ME. What is the correct value for the brain-blood partition coefficient for water? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1985; 5: 65-69.
59. Lu H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, Golay X, Lin D, Pomper M, van Zijl PC. Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005; 22: 13-22.
60. Wansapura JP, Holland SK, Dunn RS, Ball WS Jr. NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999; 9: 531-538.
61. Gelman N, Ewing JR, Gorell JM, Spickler EM, Solomon EG. Interregional variation of longitudinal relaxation rates in human brain at 3.0T: relation to estimated iron and water contents. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001; 45: 71-79.