Comparing Spatial Planning Systems and Planning Cultures in Europe. The Need for a Multi-scalar Approach

Planning Practice and Research

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 25-40

  Getimis, Panagiotis ^a  

^a PANTEION UNIVERSITY   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; CULTURE; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; PLANNING HISTORY; PLANNING SYSTEM; SPATIAL PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84859589239     PISSN: 02697459     EISSN: 13600583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02697459.2012.659520     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Adam, S. and Kriesi, H. 2007. "The Network approach". In Theories of Policy Process, Edited by: Sabatier, P. 129-154. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
2. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Planning Theory, Hampshire: Palgrave.
3. Benz, A. 1992. Kooperative Vewaltung, Funktionen, Voraussetzungen und Folgen, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
4. Berking, H. 2008. "Staedte lassen sich an ihrem Gang erkennen wie Menschen-Skizzen zur Erforschung des Stadt und der Staete". In Die Eigenlogik der Staedte, Edited by: Berking, H. and Loew, M. 15-31. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
5. Bernt, M. and Gorg, C. 2008. "Searching for the Scale - Skalenprobleme als Herausforderung der Stadt- und Umweltforschung". In Politics of Scale, Raume der Globalisierung und Perspektiven emanzipatorischer Politik, Edited by: Wissen, M., Rottger, B. and Heeg, S. 226-250. Muenster: Westfalisches Dampfboot.
6. Bevir, M., Rhodes, R. A. W. and Weller, P. 2003. Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81: 1-17.
7. Böhme, K. 2002. Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice Stockholm Nordregio Report No. 8
8. Böhme, K. and Waterhout, B. 2008. "The Europeanization of planning". In European Spatial Research and Planning, Edited by: Faludi, A. 225-248. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
9. Brenner, N. 2001. The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4): 591-614.
10. Caspring, A. 2009. Planungskultur: Plastikwort oder Passepartout?. PND Online, 2: 1-10.
11. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies, Regional Development Studies, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
12. Danielzyk, R. 2009. Gruppendiskussion über Planungskultur 1-2. PND Online II
13. Davies, H. W. E., Edwards, D., Hooper, A. J. and Punter, J. V. 1989. "Comparative Study". In Planning Control in Western Europe, Edited by: Davies, H. W. E. 409-442. London: HMSO.
14. Davoudi, S. 2006. The evidence - policy interface in strategic waste planning for urban environments: The'technical' and the 'social' dimensions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24: 681-700.
15. During, R., Dam, R. and Zande, A. 2009. "A missing link in the cultural evolution of the European union: Confronting EU ideology with INTERREG III practice concerning cultural diversity in process". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 255-279. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
16. Faludi, A. 2005. "The Netherlands: A culture with a soft spot for planning". In Comparative Planning Cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 285-308. New York: Routledge.
17. Fainstein, S. 1995. Politics, economics, and planning: Why urban regimes matter. Planning Theory, 14: 34-43.
18. Farinós, J. Dasi. 2006. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level, Luxemburg: ESPON Coordination Unit. (ESPON Project 2.3.2
19. Fischer, F. and Forester, J. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Durham and London: Duke University Press.
20. Flyvbjerg, B. 1998. Rationality and Power. Democracy in Practice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power, Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Friedmann, J. 2005b. "Planning cultures in transition". In Comparative Planning Cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. NewYork: Routledge.
23. Friedmann, J. 1998. Planning theory revisited. European Planning Studies, 6(3): 245
24. Fuerst, D. 1997. Humanvermoegen und regionale Steuerungsstile-Bedeutung fuer das Reginalmanagement?. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis, 6: 187-204.
25. Fuerst, D. 2003. Entwicklung und Stand des Steuerungsvestaendnisses in der Raumplanung. DISP, 163: 16-27.
26. Fuerst, D. 2007. Planungskultur, Auf dem Weg zu einem besseren Verstandnis von Planungsprozessen?. PNDonline, 3: 1-15.
27. Fuerst, D. 2009. "Planning cultures en Route to a better comprehension of 'Planning Process'". In Planning cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 23-48. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
28. Gherardi, S. 2000. Where learning is: Metaphors and situated learning in a planning group. Human Relations, 53(8): 1057-1080.
29. Gualini, E. 2006. The rescaling of governance in Europe: New spatial and institutional rationales. European Planning Studies, 14(7): 881-904.
30. Haas, P. M. and Haas, E. B. 1995. Learning to learn: Improving international governance. Global Governance, 1: 255-285.
31. Hantrais, L. and Mangen, S. 1996. Cross-national Research Methods in the Social Sciences, London: Cassell.
32. Haus, M. and Heinelt, H. 2005. "How to achieve governability at the local level? Theoretical and conceptual considerations on a complementarity of urban leadership and community involvement'". In Urban Governance and Democracy, Edited by: Haus, M., Heinelt, H. and Stewart, M. 12-39. London: Routledge.
33. Healey, P. 2006. Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies,: 525-546.
34. Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, London: Routledge.
35. Healey, P. and Williams, R. 1993. European urban planning systems: Diversity and convergence. Urban Studies, 30(4/5): 701-720.
36. Heinelt, H. 2008. Demokratie jenseits des Staates, Partizipatives Regieren und Governance Nomos
37. Heinelt, H., Getimis, P., Kafkalas, G., Smith, R. and Swyngedouw, E. 2002. Participatory Governance in a Multi-Level Context: Concepts and Experience, Opladen: Leske and Budrich.
38. Heinelt, H., Sweeting, D. and Getimis, P. 2006. Legitimacy and Urban Governance: A Cross-national Comparative Study, New York: Routledge.
39. Heinelt, H. and Hlepas, N. K. 2006. "Typologies of local government systems". In The European Mayor, Wiesbaden VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften Edited by: Baeck, H., Heinelt, H. and Magnier, A. 21-42.
40. Hesse, J. J. and Sharpe, L. J. 1991. "Local government in international perspective: Some comparative observations". In Local Government and Urban Affairs in International Perspective, Edited by: Hesse, J. J. and Sharpe, L. J. 603-621. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
41. Hildenbrand, A. 1996. Política de Ordenación de Territorio en Europa, Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
42. Hofstede, G. and Hofstede, G. J. 2005. Cultures and Organisations Software of the Mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Huxley, M. and Yiftachel, O. 2000. New paradigm or old myopia: Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3): 101-110.
44. Jann, W. 2000. "Verwaltungskulturen im internationalen Vergleich. Ein Überblick über den Stand der empirischen Forschung". Edited by: Verwaltung, Die. Vol. 33, 325-50.
45. Jessop, B. 1998. The rise of governance and the risk of governance failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal, 155: 29-45.
46. Jessop, B., Brenner, N. and Jones, M. 2008. Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26: 389-401.
47. Keller, D. A., Koch, M. and Selle, K. 1993. Planungskulturen in Europa. Erkundungen in Deutschland, Frankreich, Italien und in der Schweiz, Darmstadt: Verl. f. Wiss. Publ. DISP 115
48. Keller, D. A., Koch, M. and Selle, K. 1996. "Either/or" and "and": first impressions of a journey into the planning cultures of four countries. Planning Perspectives, 11: 41-54.
49. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009a. "En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 39-62. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
50. Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 2009b. "Planning cultures in europe between convergence and divergence: Findings, explanations and perspectives". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 301-321. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
51. Lauria, M. 1997. Reconstructing Urban Regime Theory: Regulating Urban Politics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Lenschow, A., Liefferink, D. and Veenman, S. 2005. When the birds sing. A framework for analysing domestic factors behind policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5): 797-816.
53. Loew, M. 2008. "Eigenlogische Strukturen- Differenzen zwischen Staedte als konzeptionelle Herausforderung". In Die Eigenlogik der Staedte, Edited by: Berking, H. and Loew, M. 33-53. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
54. Marcou, G. 2004. La planification à l'echelle des grands territories. Etude comparative (Allemagne, Espagne, Italie, Pays-Bas, Royaume-Uni) Paris
55. Matthiesen, U. 2008. "Eigenlogiken staedtischer Wissenslandschaften-Zur Koevolutionsdynamik von Stadt- und Wissenentwicklungen in urbanen Knoweledge Scapes". In Die Eigenlogik der Staedte, Edited by: Berking, H. and Loew, M. 99-152. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag GmbH.
56. Matthiesen, U. 2009. KnoweledgeScapes. DISP, 177(2): 10-28.
57. Mouritzen, P. E. and Svara, J. H. 2002. Leadership in apex. Politicians and administrators in western local governments, (Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press).
58. Newman, P. and Thornley, A. 1996. Urban Planning in Europe. International Competition, National Systems And Planning Projects, London: Routledge.
59. Ng, M. K. 2005. "Planning cultures in tow chines transitional cities: Hong Kong and Shenzhen". In Comparative Planning Cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 113-143. New York: Routledge.
60. Nullmeier, F. 1993. "Wissen und Policy-Forschung. Wissenspolitologie und rhetorisch-dialektisches Handlungsmodell". Edited by: Héritier, A. 175-196. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Policy-Analyze, Kritik und Neuorientierung, PVS-Sonderheft 24
61. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. and Walker, J. 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resource, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
62. Ostrom, E. 2007. "Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework". In Theories of Policy Process, Edited by: Sabatier, P. 21-64. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
63. Reimer, M. and Blotevogel, H. H. Comparing spatial planning practice in Europe: A plea for cultural sensitization. Planning Practice & Research, 27(1)
64. Richardson, J. J., Gustaffson, G. and Jordan, G. 1982. "The concept of policy style". In Policy Styles in Western Europe, Edited by: Richardson, J. J. 1-16. London: Allen & Unwin.
65. Sabatier, P. A. and Jenkins-Smith, H. C. 1999. "The advocacy coalition framework. an assessment". In Theories of the Policy Process, Edited by: Sabatier, P. A. 117-168. Boulder, CO: Boulder Westview Press.
66. Sandercock, L. 1998. Towards Cosmopolis, Planning for Multicultural Cities, Chichester: Wiley.
67. Sandercock, L. 2005. "Picking the paradoxes: A historical anatomy of Australian planning cultures". In Comparative Planning Cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 309-330. New York: Routledge.
68. Sanyal, B. 2005. "Hybrid planning cultures: The search for the global cultural commons". In Comparative planning cultures, Edited by: Sanyal, B. 3-28. New York: Routledge.
69. Scharpf, F. W. 2000. Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung, Opladen: Leske Budrich.
70. Scharpf, F. 1997. Games Real Actors Play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder: Westview.
71. Schoen, D. and Rein, M. 1994. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Controversions, NewYork: Basic Books.
72. Selle, K. 2009. Gruppendiskussion über Planungskultur. PND Online, 2: 6-7.
73. Sellers, J. and Lidström, A. 2007. Decentralization, local government, and the welfare state. Governance, 20(4): 609-632.
74. Smith, N. 2004. "Scale bending and the fate of the national". In Scale and Geographic Inquiry, Edited by: Sheppard, E. and McMaster, R. B. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
75. Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace, Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Peal-and-Imagined Places, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
76. Stead, D. and Nadin, V. 2009. "Planning cultures between models of society and planning systems". In Planning Cultures in Europe, Edited by: Knieling, J. and Othengrafen, F. 284-300. Farnham: Ashgate.
77. Swyngedouw, E. 1997. "Neither global nor local: Glocalization and the Politics of scale". In Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, Edited by: Cox, K. 137-166. New York: Guilford.
78. Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Globalisation or 'Glocalisation'? networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1): 25-48.
79. Tewdwr-Jones, M. 2002. The Planning Polity: Planning, Government and the Policy Process, London: Routledge.
80. Wehling, P. 2004. Reflexive Wissenpolitik: Oeffnung und Eweiterung eines neuen Politikfeldes. Teshnikfolgenabschaetzung. Theorie und Praxis, 13(3): 63-71.
81. Wiegandt, C. 2009. Gruppendiskussion über Planungskultur. PND Online, 2: 5-6.
82. Wissen, M. 2008. "Zur raumlichen Dimensionierung sozialer Prozesse Die Scale-Debatte in der angloamerikanischen Radical Geography - eine Einleitung". In Politics of Scale, Raume der Globalisierung und Perspektiven Emanzipatorischer Politik, Edited by: Wissen, M., Rottger, B. and Heeg, S. 8-32. Muenster Westfalisches Dampfboot.
83. Zimmermann, K. 2009. Changing governance - Evolving knowledge scapes. How we might think of a planning relevant politics of local knowledge. DISP, 178(3): 56-66.