Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Approximate zero-consistent 2-D boundary conditions and still shallow-water tests

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 226-253

  Vacondio, R ^a   Rogers, B D ^b   Stansby, P K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAM-BREAKS; FERRARI; INTERNAL ANGLES; KERNEL FUNCTION; NUMERICAL CONVERGENCE; SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS; SHALLOW-WATER; SHALLOW-WATER FLOW; SMOOTHED PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS; SOLID BOUNDARIES; SOLID WALL; SOURCE TERMS; STILL WATER; TEST CASE; VIRTUAL BOUNDARY;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; MIRRORS; PIERCING; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 84859571251     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2559     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamic: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 1977; 181:375-389.
2. Lucy LB. A numerical approach to testing the fission hypothesis. The Astronomical Journal 1977; 82(12):1013-1924.
3. Monaghan JJ. Simulating free surface flows with SPH. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 110:399-406.
4. Tiwari S, Kuhnert J. Finite pointset method based on the projection method for simulations of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Meshfree Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 26. Springer: New York, 2003; 373-388.
5. Hietel D, Steiner K, Struckmeier J. A finite-volume particle method for compressible flows. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 2000; 10(9):1363-1382.
6. Randles PW, Libersky LD. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: some recent improvements and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 139:375-408.
7. Kulasegaram S, Bonet J, Lewis RW, Profit M. A variational formulation based contact algorithm for rigid boundaries in two-dimensional SPH applications. Computational Mechanics 2004; 33(4):316-325.
8. Lee ES, Moulinec C, Xu R, Violeau D, Laurence D, Stansby P. Comparisons of weakly compressible and truly incompressible algorithms for the SPH mesh free particle method. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(18):8417-8436.
9. Hieber S, Koumoutsakos P. An immersed boundary method for smoothed particle hydrodynamics of self-propelled swimmers. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227(19):8636-8654.
10. Ferrari A, Dumbser M, Toro EF, Armanini A. A new 3d parallel SPH scheme for free surface flows. Computers and Fluids 2009; 38(6):1203-1217.
11. Monaghan J, Kajtar J. Sph particle boundary forces for arbitrary boundaries. Computer Physics Communications 2009; 180(10):1811-1820.
12. de Leffe M, Le Touzé D, Alessandrini B. Normal flux method at the boundary for SPH. Proceedings of Fourth ERCOFTAC SPHERIC Workshop on SPH Applications, Nantes, France, 2009.
13. Bierbrauer F, Bollada P, Phillips T. A consistent reflected image particle approach to the treatment of boundary conditions in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198(41-44):3400-3410.
14. Shao S, Lo EYM. Incompressible SPH method for simulating newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Advances in Water Resources 2003; 26(7):787-800.
15. Rodriguez-Paz M, Bonet J. A corrected smooth particle hydrodynamics formulation of the shallow-water equations. Computers and Structures 2005; 17-18:1396-1410.
16. Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 1992; 30:543-574.
17. Li S, Liu WK. Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics. World Scientific Publishing: Singapore, 2003.
18. Bermúdez A, Vázquez M. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Computers & Fluids 1994; 8:1049-1071.
19. Vázquez-Cendón M. Improved treatment of source terms in upwind schemes for the shallow water equations in channels with irregular geometry. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 148(2):497-526.
20. Hubbard M, García-Navarro P. Flux difference splitting and the balancing of source terms and flux gradients. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 165(1):89-125.
21. García-Navarro P, Vázquez-Cendón M. On numerical treatment of the source terms in the shallow water equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 29:951-979.
22. Zhou J, Causon D, Mingham C, Ingram D. The surface gradient method for the treatment of source terms in the shallow-water equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2001; 168(1):1-25.
23. Rogers B, Borthwick AGL, Taylor PH. Mathematical balancing of flux gradient and source terms prior to using roes approximate Riemann solver. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 192(2):422-451.
24. Caleffi V, Valiani A, Bernini A. High-order balanced CWENO scheme for movable bed shallow water equations. Advances in Water Resources 2007; 30(4):730-741.
25. Aureli F, Maranzoni A, Mignosa P, Ziveri C. A weighted surface-depth gradient method for the numerical integration of the 2d shallow water equations with topography. Advances in Water Resources 2008; 31(7):962-974.
26. Liang Q, Borthwick AGL. Adaptive quadtree simulation of shallow flows with wet-dry fronts over complex topography. Computers and Fluids 2009; 38(2):221-234.
27. Ata R, Soulaïmani A. A stabilized SPH method for inviscid shallow water flows. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2004; 47(2):139-159.
28. Bonet J, Lok TSL. Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1999; 180:97-115.
29. Benz W. Smooth particle hydrodynamics-a review. In Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Numerical Modelling of Nonlinear Stellar Pulsations Problems and Prospects, Buchler RJ (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
30. Marion J, Thornton S. Classical Dynamics for Particles and Systems. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.: New York, 1988.
31. Randles PW, Libersky LD. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: some recent improvements and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1996; 139:375-408.
32. Basa M, Quinlan NJ, Lastiwka M. Robustness and accuracy of sph formulations for viscous flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008; DOI: 10.1002/fld.1927.
33. Cleary PW, Monaghan JJ. Conduction modelling using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 148:227-264.
34. Monaghan JJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Reports on Progress in Physics 2005; 68:1703-1759.
35. Hernquist L, Katz N. TREESPH-a unification of SPH with the hierarchical tree method. The Astrophysical Journal 1989; 70:419-446.
36. Toro E. Shock Capturing Methods for Free Surface Shallow Water Flows. Wiley: New York, 1991.