Flux Difference Splitting and the Balancing of Source Terms and Flux Gradients

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-125

  Hubbard, M E ^a   Garcia Navarro, P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Conservation laws; Finite volume schemes; Flux limiters; Slope limiters; Source terms; Upwind schemes

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL METHODS; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES;

CONSERVATION LAW; DISCRETIZATIONS; FINITE VOLUME SCHEMES; FLUX DIFFERENCE SPLITTING; FLUX GRADIENTS; FLUX LIMITERS; SLOPE LIMITER; SOURCE TERMS; SPLITTING METHOD; UP-WIND SCHEME;

EQUATIONS OF MOTION;

EID: 0011032642     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6603     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bermúdez A., Vázquez M. E. Upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws with source terms. Comput. Fluids. 23:1994;1049.
2. Bermúdez A., Dervieux A., Desideri J.-A., Vázquez M. E. Upwind schemes for the two-dimensional shallow water equations with variable depth using unstructured meshes. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 155:1998;49.
3. Cunge J. A., Holly F. M., Verwey A. Practical Aspects of Computational River Hydraulics. 1980.
4. Goutal N., Maurel F. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Dam-Break Wave Simulation. 1997.
5. Garcia-Navarro P., Vazquez-Cendon M. E. Some Considerations and Improvements on the Performance of Roe's Scheme for 1d Irregular Geometries. 1997.
6. Glaister P. Difference Schemes for the Shallow Water Equations. 1987.
7. Glaister P. Prediction of supercritical flow in open channels. Comput. Math. Appl. 24:1992;69.
8. Hubbard M. E. On the Accuracy of One-Dimensional Models of Steady Converging/Diverging Open Channel Flows. 1999.
9. Huang J., Song C. S. Stability of dynamic flood routing schemes. J. Hydraul. Eng. ASCE. 111:1985.
10. M. E. Hubbard, and, N. Dodd, A 2d numerical model of wave run-up, overtopping and regeneration, in preparation.
11. Hudson J. Numerical Techniques for the Shallow Water Equations. 1999.
12. Jenny P., Muller B. Rankine-Hugoniot-Riemann solver considering source terms and multidimensional effects. J. Comput. Phys. 145:1998;575.
13. LeVeque R. J. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. 1992.
14. LeVeque R. J. Balancing source terms and flux gradients in high-resolution Godunov methods: The quasi-steady wave-propagation algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 146:1998;346.
15. Priestley A. Roe-Type Schemes for Super-Critical Flows in Rivers. 1989.
16. Roe P. L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43:1981;357.
17. P. L. Roe, Fluctuations and signals - A framework for numerical evolution problems, in Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, edited by K. W. MortonOxford Univ. Press, London, 1982, 219-257.
18. Roe P. L. Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18:1986;337.
19. Smolarkiewicz P. K., Margolin L. G. MPDATA: A finite-difference solver for geophysical flows. J. Comput. Phys. 140:1998;459.
20. Sweby P. K. High resolution schemes using flux limiters for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 21:1984;995.
21. Vázquez-Cendón M. E. Improved treatment of source terms in upwind schemes for the shallow water equations in channels with irregular geometry. J. Comput. Phys. 148:1999;497.
22. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:1979;101.