Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Some recent improvements and applications

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 139, Issue 1-4, 1996, Pages 375-408

  Randles, P W ^a   Libersky, L D ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; FRACTURE; HYDRODYNAMICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TENSORS;

COMPUTATIONAL CONTINUUM DYNAMICS; CONTINUUM DAMAGE; SMOOTH PARTICLE HYDRODYNAMICS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 0030405630     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01090-0     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. L.B. Lucy, A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis, Astron. J. 82 (1977) 1013.
2. R.A. Gingold and J.J. Monaghan, Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 181 (1977) 375.
3. L.D. Libersky and A.G. Petschek, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics with strength of materials, in: H. Trease, J. Fritts and W. Crowley eds., Proceedings, The Next Free Lagrange Conf., Springer-Verlag, NY, 395 (1991) 248-257.
4. Y. Wen, D.L. Hicks and J.W. Swegle, Stabilizing SPH with Conservative Smoothing, Sandia Report, SAND94-1932, 1994.
5. G.R. Johnson and S.R. Beissel, Normalized smoothing functions for impact computations, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., in press.
6. D. Everhart, Private communication, 1995.
7. W. Benz, Numerical Modeling of Non-linear Stellar pulsation: Problems and Prospects in: J.R. Buchler, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990).
8. L.D. Libersky, A.G. Petschek, T.C. Carney, J.R. Hipp and F.A. Allahdadi, High strain Lagrangian hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 109 (1993) 67-75.
9. G.V. Bicknell, SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput. 12 (1991) 1198.
10. J.J. Monaghan and R.A. Gingold, Shock simulation by the particle method SPH, J. Comput. Phys. 52 (1983) 374.
11. W. Herrmann, Constitutive equations for large dynamic deformations, Proceedings, Third Int. Conf. on Consitutive Laws for Eng. Materials, Tuscon, AZ (1991) 45-52.
12. D.A. Flanagan and L.M. Taylor, An accurate numerical algorithm for stress integration with finite rotations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 62 (1987) 305-320.
13. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Ballistics, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1983.
14. G.R. Johnson and T.J. Holmquist, Test data and computational strength and fracture model constants for 23 materials subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high temperatures, LA-11463-MS, Los Alamos National Lab., 1989.
15. D.L. Hicks, J.W. Swegle and S.W. Attaway, SPH: Instabilities, wall heating, and conservative smoothing, workshop on advances in smooth particle hydrodynamics, Workshop Proceedings, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report Number LA-UR-93-4375 (1993) 223-256.
16. J.W. Swegle, D.L. Hicks and S.W. Attaway, Smoothed particle hydrodynamics stability analysis, J. Comput. Phys. 116 (1995) 123-134.
17. C.T. Dyka, Addressing tension instability in SPH methods, NRL Report NRL/MR/6384, 1994.
18. D. S. Balsara, von Neumann Stability analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics - suggestions for optimal algorithms, J. Comput. Phys. 121 (1995) 357-372.
19. J.P.A. Morris, A study of the stability properties of SPH, Department of Mathematics, Monash University, Clayton Victoria Australia, Report 94/22 (1994) 1-59.
20. C.T. Dyka and R.P. Ingel, An approach for tension instability in smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Comput. Struct. 57 (1995) 573-580.
21. C. Guenther, D.L. Hicks and J.W. Swegle, Conservative smoothing verses artificial viscosity, Sandia Report SAND94-1853, Sandia National Lab., Alb. NM 87185, 1994.
22. J.W. Swegle, S.W. Attaway, M.W. Heinstein, F.J. Mello and D.L. Hicks, An analysis of smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Sandia Report SAND94-2513, Sandia National Lab., Alb. NM 87185, 1994.
23. R.D. Richtmyer and K.W. Morton, Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems, 2nd edition (J. Wiley and Sons, 1967).
24. P.M. Campbell, Some new algorithms for boundary value problems in smoothed particle hydrodynamics, DNA Report DNA-TR-88-286, 1989.
25. H.T. Takeda, S.M Miyama and M. Sekiya, Numerical simulation of viscous flow by smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Progr. Theoret. Phys. 92 (1994) 939-960.
26. D. Sulsky, The material point method for large deformation solid mechanics, Third U.S. Congress on Computational Mechanics, USACM, Dallas TX (1995) 214.
27. J.U. Brackbill, D.B. Kothe and C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys. (1991).
28. W. Benz and E. Asphaug, Impact simulations with fracture. I. Methods and tests, ICARUS 107 (1994) 98-116.
29. W. Benz and E. Asphaug, Simulations of brittle solids using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Comput. Phys. Comm. 87 (1995) 253-265.
30. C.A. Wingate and R. Stellingwerf, SPHINX users manual, LAUR 93-2476, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545, 1994.
31. D.A. Mandell and C.A. Wingate, Prediction of material strength and fracture of glass using the SPHINX smoothed particle hydrodymanics code, LANL report LA-12830, Los Alamos National Lab., Los Alamos, NM 87545, 1994.
32. D.E. Grady and M.E. Kipp, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 17 (1980) 147-157.
33. G.R. Johnson and W.H. Cook, Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures, and pressures, Engrg. Fract. Mech. 21 (1985) 31.
34. P.W. Randles and J.A. Nemes, A continuum damage model for thick composite materials subjected to high-rate dynamic loading, Mech. Mater. 13 (1992) 1-13.
35. J.A. Nemes, and P.W. Randles, Constitutive modeling of high strain-rate deformation and spall fracture of graphite/peek composites, Mech. Mater. 19 (1994) 1-14.
36. T.C. Carney, Private communication, 1995.
37. R. Talreja, A continuum mechanics characterization of damage in composite materials, Proc. R. Soc. A3999 (1985) 195.
38. A.J. Piekutowski, A simple dynamic model for the formation of debris clouds, Int. J. Impact Engrg. 10 (1990) 453.
39. A.G. Petschek and L.D. Libersky, Cylindrical smoothed particle hydrodynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 109 (1993) 76-83.
40. P.W. Randles, T.C. Carney, L.D. Libersky, J.R. Renick and A.G. Petschek, Calculation of oblique impact and fracture of tungsten cubes using smoothed particle hydrodynamics, Int. J. Impact Engrg. 17 (1995).
41. J.D. Renick, Response of multi-layered structural panels to high velocity impact, Phillips Lab. Report PL-TR-93-1061, submitted, Kirtland AFB, NM 87117, 1994.
42. D.P. Dandekar, Loss of shear strength in polycrystalline tungsten under shock compression, J. Appl. Phys. 47 (1976) 4703.
43. J.R. Asay, L.C. Chabildas and D.P. Dandekar, Shear strength of shock-loaded polycrystalline tungsten, J. Appl. Phys. 51 (1980) 4774.
44. P.W. Randles, T.C. Carney and L.D. Libersky, Continuum dynamical simulations of bomb fragmentation, Proc. 15th Int. Ballistics. Symp., Jerusalem, Israel 2 (1995) 289-296.
45. D.E. Grady, and D.A. Benson, Fragmentation of metal rings by electromagnetic loading, Experimental Mech. 23 (1983) 393.
46. D.A. Matuska, Explosive Modeling, presented at DNA-Sponsored Physics and Modeling of Detonation of Aluminized Explosives Working Group Meeting, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 13-14 December, 1993.
47. Air-to-Surface Weapons Characteristics (JMEM) (U), App. C, Sec. 6, Table C-32, C-153.
48. W. Mock, Jr. and W.H. Holt, Fragmentation behavior of Armco iron and HF-1 steel explosive-filled cylinders, J. Appl. Phys. 54 (1983) 2344-2351.