Reprogramming pig fetal fibroblasts reveals a functional LIF signaling pathway

Cellular Reprogramming

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 112-122

  Thomson, Alison J ^a   Pierart, Hadrien ^a   Meek, Stephen ^a   Bogerman, Alexandra ^a   Sutherland, Linda ^a   Murray, Helen ^a   Mountjoy, Edward ^a   Downing, Alison ^a   Talbot, Richard ^a   Sartori, Chiara ^a   Whitelaw, C Bruce A ^a   Freeman, Tom C ^a   Archibald, Alan L ^a   Burdon, Tom ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; STAGE SPECIFIC EMBRYO ANTIGEN 4; STAT3 PROTEIN; SUPPRESSOR OF CYTOKINE SIGNALING 3; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; CELL GROWTH; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FETUS; FIBROBLAST; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FETUS; FIBROBLASTS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR; MICE; MICE, INBRED NOD; MICE, SCID; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SWINE; TRANSFECTION;

MAMMALIA; SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 84859505002     PISSN: 21524971     EISSN: 21524998     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cell.2011.0078     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alberio, R., Croxall, N., and Allegrucci, C. (2010). Pig epiblast stem cells depend on activin/nodal signaling for pluripotency and self-renewal. Stem Cells Dev. 19, 1627-36.
2. Bao, L., He, L., Chen, J., et al. (2011). Reprogramming of ovine adult fibroblasts to pluripotency via drug-inducible expression of defined factors. Cell Res. 21, 600-508.
3. Boland, M.J., Hazen, J.L., Nazor, K.L., et al. (2009). Adult mice generated frominduced pluripotent stemcells. Nature 461, 91-94.
4. Brons, I.G., Smithers, L.E., Trotter, M.W., et al. (2007). Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191-195. (Pubitemid 47067373)
5. Buecker, C., Chen, H.H., Polo, J.M., et al. (2010). A murine ESClike state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 535-546.
6. Burdon, T., Stracey, C., Chambers, I., et al. (1999). Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signaling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 210, 30-43. (Pubitemid 29275085)
7. Esteban, M.A., Xu, J., Yang, J., et al. (2009). Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from tibetan miniature pig. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 17634-17640.
8. Ezashi, T., Telugu, B.P., Alexenko, A.P., et al. (2009). Derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from pig somatic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10993-10998.
9. Freeman, T.C., Goldovsky, L., Brosch, M., et al. (2007). Construction, visualisation, and clustering of transcription networks from microarray expression data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, 2032-2042. (Pubitemid 350043416)
10. Greber, B., Wu, G., Bernemann, C., et al. (2010). Conserved and divergent roles of FGF signaling in mouse epiblast stem cells and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 215-226.
11. Guo, G., Yang, J., Nichols, J., et al. (2009). Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136, 1063-1069.
12. Hall, V. (2008). Porcine embryonic stem cells: a possible source for cell replacement therapy. Stem Cell Rev. 4, 275-282.
13. Han, D.W., Tapia, N., Joo, J.Y., et al. (2010). Epiblast stem cell subpopulations represent mouse embryos of distinct pregastrulation stages. Cell 143, 617-627.
14. Hanna, J., Cheng, A.W., Saha, K., et al. (2010). Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9222-9227.
15. Hochberg, Y., and Benjamini, Y. (1990). More powerful procedures for multiple significance testing. Stat. Med. 9, 811-818. (Pubitemid 20343989)
16. Hotta, A., and Ellis, J. (2008). Retroviral vector silencing during iPS cell induction: an epigenetic beacon that signals distinct pluripotent states. J. Cell. Biochem. 105, 940-948.
17. Kaji, K., Norrby, K., Paca, A., et al. (2009). Virus-free induction of pluripotency and subsequent excision of reprogramming factors. Nature 458, 771-775.
18. Kang, L., Wu, T., Tao, Y., et al. (2011). Viable mice produced from three-factor induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells through tetraploid complementation. Cell Res. 21, 546-549.
19. Keller, G. (2005). Embryonic stem cell differentiation: emergence of a new era in biology and medicine. Genes Dev. 19, 1129-1155. (Pubitemid 40696181)
20. Kim, J., Chu, J., Shen, X., et al. (2008). An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132, 1049-1061. (Pubitemid 351381745)
21. Li, Y., Cang, M., Lee, A.S., et al. (2011). Reprogramming of sheep fibroblasts into pluripotency under a drug-inducible expression of mouse-derived defined factors. PLoS One 6, e15947.
22. Meek, S., Buehr, M., Sutherland, L., et al. (2010). Efficient gene targeting by homologous recombination in rat embryonic stem cells. PLoS One 5, e14225.
23. Mikkelsen, T.S., Hanna, J., Zhang, X., et al. (2008). Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49-55. (Pubitemid 351931978)
24. Montserrat, N., Bahima, E.G., Batlle, L., et al. (2011). Generation of pig iPS cells: a model for cell therapy. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 4, 121-30.
25. Nichols, J., and Smith, A. (2009). Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487-492.
26. Nichols, J., Chambers, I., Taga, T., et al. 2001). Physiological rationale for responsiveness of mouse embryonic stem cells to gp130 cytokines. Development 128, 2333-2339. (Pubitemid 32633366)
27. Niwa, H. (2007). How is pluripotency determined and maintained? Development 134, 635-646. (Pubitemid 46437906)
28. Silva, J., Barrandon, O., Nichols, J., et al. (2008). Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol. 6, e253.
29. Silva, J., Nichols, J., Theunissen, T.W., et al. (2009). Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722-737.
30. Soldner, F., Hockemeyer, D., Beard, C., et al. (2009). Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell 136, 964-977.
31. Sommer, C.A., Sommer, A.G., Longmire, T.A., et al. (2010). Excision of reprogramming transgenes improves the differentiation potential of iPS cells generated with a single excisable vector. Stem Cells 28, 64-74.
32. Sridharan, R., Tchieu, J., Mason, M.J., et al. (2009). Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364-377.
33. Takahashi, K., and Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663-676. (Pubitemid 44233629)
34. Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., et al. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861-872. (Pubitemid 350138099)
35. Telugu, B.P., Ezashi, T., and Roberts, R.M. (2010a). Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells analogous to naive and primed embryonic stem cells of the mouse. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 54, 1703-1711.
36. Telugu, B.P., Ezashi, T., and Roberts, R.M. (2010b). The promise of stem cell research in pigs and other ungulate species. Stem Cell Rev. 6, 31-41.
37. Telugu, B.P., Ezashi, T., Sinha, S., et al. (2011). Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-dependent, pluripotent stem cells established from inner cell mass of porcine embryos. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 28948-28953.
38. Tesar, P.J., Chenoweth, J.G., Brook, F.A., et al. (2007). New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196-199. (Pubitemid 47067378)
39. Thomson, M., Liu, S.J., Zou, L.N., et al. (2011). Pluripotency factors in embryonic stem cells regulate differentiation into germ layers. Cell 145, 875-889.
40. Vallier, L., Alexander, M., and Pedersen, R.A. (2005). Activin/Nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Sci. 118, 4495-4509. (Pubitemid 41556347)
41. Wang, J., Alexander, P., Wu, L., et al. (2009). Dependence of mouse embryonic stem cells on threonine catabolism. Science, 325, 435-439.
42. Wianny, F., Perreau, C., and Hochereau de Reviers, M.T. (1997). Proliferation and differentiation of porcine inner cell mass and epiblast in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 57, 756-764. (Pubitemid 27407193)
43. Woltjen, K., Michael, I.P., Mohseni, P., et al. (2009). piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 458, 766-770.
44. Wu, Z., Chen, J., Ren, J., et al. (2009). Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 1, 46-54.
45. Yang, J., van Oosten, A.L., Theunissen, T.W., et al. (2010). Stat3 activation is limiting for reprogramming to ground state pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 7, 319-328.
46. Ying, Q.L., Nichols, J., Chambers, I., et al. (2003). BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115, 281-292. (Pubitemid 37487702)
47. Zhao, S., Nichols, J., Smith, A.G., et al. (2004). SoxB transcription factors specify neuroectodermal lineage choice in ES cells. Mol. Cell Neurosci. 27, 332-342. (Pubitemid 39433845)
48. Zhao, X.Y., Li, W., Lv, Z., et al. (2009). iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature 461, 86-90.