The measles virus N TAIL-XD complex: An illustrative example of fuzziness

Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology

Volumn 725, Issue , 2012, Pages 126-141

  Longhi, Sonia ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VIRUS NUCLEOPROTEIN; NUCLEOPROTEIN; NUCLEOPROTEIN, MEASLES VIRUS; PHOSPHOPROTEIN; VIRUS PROTEIN;

ALPHA HELIX; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; MEASLES VIRUS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PLASMON RESONANCE; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; VIRUS INHIBITION; VIRUS REPLICATION; VIRUS TRANSCRIPTION; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

MEASLES VIRUS;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MEASLES VIRUS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEOPROTEINS; PHOSPHOPROTEINS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; VIRAL PROTEINS;

EID: 84859499620     PISSN: 00652598     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0659-4_8     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Longhi S, Canard B. Mécanismes de transcription et de réplication des Paramyxoviridae. Virologie 1999: 3:227-240.
2. Lamb RA, Kolakofsky D. Paramyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, eds. Fields Virology. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven 2001:1305-1340.
3. Albertini AAV, Schoehn G, Ruigrok RW. Structures impliquées dans la réplication et la transcription des virus à ARN non segmentésde sens négatif. Virologie 2005; 9:83-92.
4. Roux L. Dans le génome des Paramyxovirinae, les promoteurs et leurs activités sont façonnés par la regle de six. Virologie 2005: 9:19-34.
5. Karlin D, Longhi S, Receveur V et al. The N-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein of morbilliviruses belongs to the natively unfolded class of proteins. Virology 2002; 296:251-262.
6. Longhi S, Receveur-Brechot V, Karlin D et al. The C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein is intrinsically disordered and folds upon binding to the C-terminal moiety of the phosphoprotein. J Biol Chem 2003: 278:18638-18648.
7. Karlin D, Ferron F, Canard B et al. Structural disorder and modular organization in Paramyxovirinae N and P. J Gen Virol 2003: 84:3239-3252.
8. Bourhis J, Johansson K, Receveur-Brechot V et al. The C-terminal domain of measles virus nucleoprotein belongs to the class of intrinsically disordered proteins that fold upon binding to their pohysiological partner. Virus Research 2004: 99:157-167.
9. Bourhis JM, Receveur-Bréchot V,Oglesbee M et al. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain ofthe measles virus nucleoprotein interacts with the C-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein via two distinct sites and remains predominantly unfolded. Protein Sci 2005; 14:1975-1992.
10. Bourhis JM, Canard B, Longhi S. Désordre structural au sein du complexe réplicatif du virus de larougeole: implications fonctionnelles. Virologie 2005; 9:367-383.
11. Bourhis JM, Canard B, Longhi S. Structural disorder within the replicative complex of measles virus: functional implications. Virology 2006; 344:94-110.
12. Bourhis JM, Longhi S. Measles virus nucleoprotein: structural organization and functional role of the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain. In: Longhi S, ed. Measles virus nucleoprotein. Hauppage, NY: Nova Publishers Inc., 2007:1-35.
13. Longhi S. Nucleocapsid Structure and Function. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2009; 329:103-128.
14. Longhi S,Oglesbee M. Structural disorder within the measles virus nucleoprotein and phosphoprotein. Protein and Peptide Letters 2010; 17:961-978.
15. Radivojac P, Iakoucheva LM, Oldfield CJet al. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophys J 2007; 92:1439-1456.
16. Dunker AK, Oldfield CJ, Meng J et al. The unfoldomics decade: an update on intrinsically disordered proteins. BMC Genomics 2008; 9 Suppl 2:S1.
17. Dunker AK, Silman I, Uversky VN et al. Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18:756-764.
18. Uversky VN. The mysterious unfoldome: structureless, underappreciated, yet vital part of any given proteome. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010; 2010:568068.
19. Karlin D, Longhi S, Canard B. Substitution of two residues in the measles virus nucleoprotein results in an impaired self-association. Virology 2002; 302:420-432.
20. Dunker AK, Cortese MS, Romero P et al. Flexible nets. Febs J 2005; 272:5129-5148.
21. Uversky VN, Oldield CJ, Dunker AK. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J Mol Recognit 2005; 18:343-384.
22. Haynes C, Oldfield CJ, Ji F et al. Intrinsic disorder is a common feature of hub proteins from four eukaryotic interactomes. PLoS Comput Biol 2006; 2:e100.
23. Liston P, Batal R, DiFlumeri C et al. Protein interaction domains of the measles virus nucleocapsid protein (NP). Arch Virol 1997; 142:305-321.
24. Bankamp B, Horikami SM, Thompson PD et al. Domains of the measles virus N protein required for binding to P protein and self-assembly. Virology 1996; 216:272-277.
25. Kingston RL, Walter AB, Gay LS. Characterization of nucleocapsid binding by the measles and the mumps virus phosphoprotein. J Virol 2004; 78:8615-8629.
26. Iwasaki M, Takeda M, Shirogane Y et al. The matrix protein of measles virus regulates viral RNA synthesis and assembly by interacting with the nucleocapsid protein. J Virol 2009.
27. Zhang X, Glendening C, Linke H et al. Identification and characterization of a regulatory domain on the carboxyl terminus of the measles virus nucleocapsid protein. J Virol 2002; 76:8737-8746.
28. Zhang X, Bourhis JM, Longhi S et al. Hsp72 recognizes a P binding motif in the measles virus N protein C-terminus. Virology 2005; 337:162-174.
29. tenOever BR, Servant MJ, Grandvaux N et al. Recognition of the Measles Virus Nucleocapsid as a Mechanism of IRF-3 Activation. J Virol 2002; 76:3659-3669.
30. Colombo M, Bourhis JM, Chamontin C et al. The interaction between the measles virus nucleoprotein and the Interferon Regulator Factor 3 relies on a speciic cellular environment. Virol J 2009; 6:59.
31. Sato H, Masuda M, Miura R etal. Morbillivirus nucleoprotein possesses a novel nuclear localization signal and a CRM1-independent nuclear export signal. Virology 2006; 352:121-130.
32. Marie JC, Kehren J, Trescol-Biemont MC et al. Mechanism of measles virus-induced suppression of inflammatory immune responses. Immunity 2001; 14:69-79.
33. Laine D, Trescol-Biémont M, Longhi S et al. Measles virus nucleoprotein binds to a novel cell surface receptor distinct from FcgRII via its C-terminal domain: role in MV-induced immunosuppression. J Virol 2003; 77:11332-11346.
34. CORE/FcgRIIB1 interactions, respectively. JGen Virol 2005; 86:1771-1784.
35. Laine D, Vidalain P, Gahnnam A etal. Interaction of measles virus nucleoprotein with cell surface receptors: impact on cell biology and immune response. In: Longhi S, ed. Measles virus nucleoprotein. Hauppage, NY: Nova Publishers Inc., 2007:113-152.
36. Chen M, Cortay JC, Gerlier D. Measles virus protein interactions in yeast: new findings and caveats. Virus Res 2003; 98:123-129.
37. Liston P, DiFlumeri C, Briedis DJ. Protein interactions entered into by the measles virus P, V and C proteins. Virus Res 1995; 38:241-259.
38. UverskyVN. Natively unfolded proteins: a point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci 2002;11:739-756.
39. Dunker AK, LawsonJD, Brown CJ etal. Intrinsically disordered protein. JMol Graph Model 2001; 19:26-59.
40. Tompa P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 2002; 27:527-533.
41. Fuxreiter M, Simon I, Friedrich P et al. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J Mol Biol 2004; 338:1015-1026.
42. Lacy ER, Filippov I, LewisWS et al. P27 binds cyclin-CDK complexes through a sequential mechanism involving binding-induced protein folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004; 11:358-364.
43. Diallo A, Barrett T, Barbron M et al. Cloning of the nucleocapsid protein gene of peste-des-petits-ruminants virus: relationshipto other morbilliviruses. J Gen Virol 1994; 75 (Pt 1):233-237.
44. Garner E, Romero P, Dunker AK et al. Predicting Binding Regions within Disordered Proteins. Genome Inform Ser Workshop Genome Inform 1999; 10:41-50.
45. Oldfield CJ, Cheng Y, Cortese MS et al. Coupled Folding and Binding with alpha-Helix-Forming Molecular Recognition Elements. Biochemistry 2005: 44:12454-12470.
46. Mohan A, Oldfield CJ, Radivojac P et al. Analysis of Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs). J Mol Biol 2006: 362:1043-1059.
47. Vacic V, Oldfield CJ, Mohan A et al. Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFsand their binding partners. J Proteome Res 2007; 6:2351-2366.
48. Johansson K, Bourhis JM, Campanacci V et al. Crystal structure of the measles virus phosphoprotein domain responsible for the induced folding of the C-terminal domain of the nucleoprotein. J Biol Chem 2003: 278:44567-44573.
49. Kingston RL, Hamel DJ, Gay LS et al. Structural basis for the attachment of a paramyxoviral polymerase to its template. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004: 101:8301-8306.
50. Meszaros B, Tompa P, Simon I et al. Molecular principles ofthe interactions ofdisordered proteins. J Mol Biol 2007: 372:549-561.
51. Tompa P, Fuxreiter M. Fuzzy complexes: polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 2008: 33:2-8.
52. Gely S, Lowry DF, Bernard C et al. Solution structure of the C-terminal X domain of the measles virus phosphoprotein and interaction with the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain ofthe nucleoprotein J Mol Recognit 2010: 23:435-447.
53. Bernard C, Gely S, Bourhis JM et al. Interaction between the C-terminal domains of N and P proteins of measles virus investigated by NMR. FEBS Lett 2009; 583:1084-1089.
54. Belle V, Rouger S, Costanzo S etal. Site-directed spinlabeling EPR spectroscopy. In: Uversky VN, Longhi S, eds. Instrumental analysis of intrinsically disordered proteins: assessing structure and conformation. Hoboken, New Jersey John Wiley and Sons, 2010.
55. Morin B, Bourhis JM, Belle V et al. Assessing induced folding of an intrinsically disordered protein by site-directed spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy. J Phys Chem B 2006; 110:20596-20608.
56. Belle V, Rouger S, Costanzo S et al. Mapping alpha-helical induced folding within the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein by site-directed spin-labeling EPR spectroscopy. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 2008; 73:973-988.
57. TAIL-XD complex by SDSL EPR spectroscopy.Biophys J 2010; 98:1055-1064.
58. Tompa P. The functional benefits of disorder. J Mol Structure (Theochem) 2003; 666-667:361-371.
59. Dunker AK, Garner E, Guilliot S et al. Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: theory, predictions and observations. Pac Symp Biocomput 1998; 3:473-484.
60. Wright PE, Dyson HJ. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J Mol Biol 1999: 293:321-331.
61. Dunker AK,ObradovicZ.The protein trinity-linkingfunctionanddisorder. NatBiotechnol2001; 19:805-806.
62. Dunker AK, Brown CJ, Obradovic Z. Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Adv Protein Chem 2002: 62:25-49.
63. Uversky VN, Li J, Souillac P etal. Biophysical properties ofthe synucleins and their propensities to fibrillate: inhibition of alpha-synuclein assembly by beta-and gamma- synucleins. J Biol Chem 2002; 25:25.
64. Gunasekaran K, Tsai CJ, Kumar S etal. Extended disordered proteins: targeting function with less scaffold. Trends Biochem Sci 2003: 28:81-85.
65. Fink AL. Natively unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15:35-41.
66. Dyson HJ,Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:197-208.
67. Sivakolundu SG, Bashford D, Kriwacki RW. Disordered p27Kip1 exhibits intrinsic structure resembling the Cdk2/cyclin A-bound conformation. J Mol Biol 2005; 353:1118-1128.
68. Plumet S, Duprex WP, Gerlier D. Dynamics ofviral RNA synthesis during measles virus infection. J Virol 2005: 79:6900-6908.
69. Oglesbee M, Tatalick L, Rice J et al. Isolation and characterization ofcanine distemper virus nucleocapsid variants. J Gen Virol 1989; 70 (Pt 9):2409-2419.
70. Robbins SJ, Bussell RH. Structural phosphoproteins associated with purifiedmeasles virions and cytoplasmic nucleocapsids. Intervirology 1979: 12:96-102.
71. Robbins SJ, Bussell RH, Rapp F. Isolation and partial characterization of two forms ofcytoplasmic nucleocapsids from measles virus-infected cells. J Gen Virol 1980; 47:301-310.
72. Stallcup KC, Wechsler SL, Fields BN. Puriication of measles virus and characterization of subviral components. J Virol 1979: 30:166-176.
73. Vasconcelos D, Norrby E,Oglesbee M. The cellular stress response increases measles virus-induced cytopathic effect. J Gen Virol 1998; 79:1769-1773.
74. Vasconcelos DY, Cai XH, Oglesbee MJ. Constitutive overexpression of themajor inducible70 kDa heat shock protein mediates large plaque formation by measles virus. J Gen Virol 1998; 79:2239-2247.
75. Oglesbee MJ, Kenney H, Kenney T et al. Enhanced production ofmorbillivirus gene-specific RNAs following induction of the cellular stress response in stable persistent infection. Virology 1993; 192:556-567.
76. Oglesbee MJ, Liu Z, Kenney H et al. The highly inducible member of the 70 kDa family of heat shock proteins increases canine distemper virus polymerase activity. J Gen Virol 1996; 77:2125-2135.
77. Carsillo T, Zhang X, Vasconcelos D et al. A single codon in the nucleocapsid protein C terminus contributes to in vitro and in vivo itness of Edmonston measles virus. J Virol 2006; 80:2904-2912.
78. Oglesbee M. Nucleocapsid protein interactions with the major inducible 70 kDa heat shock protein. In: Longhi S, ed. Measles virus nucleoprotein. Hauppage, NY: Nova Publishers Inc., 2007:53-98.
79. Tsai CD, Ma B, Kumar S et al. Protein folding: binding of conformationally luctuating building blocks via population selection. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2001; 36:399-433.
80. Tsai CJ, Ma B, Sham YY et al. Structured disorder and conformational selection. Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 2001; 44:418-427.
81. Shoemaker BA, Portman JJ, Wolynes PG. Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: the ly-casting mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:8868-8873.
82. Tarbouriech N, Curran J, Ruigrok RW et al. Tetrameric coiled coil domain of Sendai virus phosphoprotein. Nat Struct Biol 2000; 7:777-781.
83. DeLano WL.The PyMOL molecular graphics system Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics 2002; 30:442-454.