Theoretical and Experimental Characterisation of Magnetic Microbubbles

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 864-875

  Mulvana, Helen ^a   Eckersley, Robert J ^a   Tang, Meng Xing ^a   Pankhurst, Quentin ^b   Stride, Eleanor ^c  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b DAVY FARADAY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug delivery; Gene therapy; High speed camera; Magnetic microbubbles; Magnetic nanoparticles; Ultrasound; Ultrasound contrast agents

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC DATA; ACOUSTIC RESPONSE; AMPLITUDE OF OSCILLATION; ATTENUATION RATIO; DRUG/GENE DELIVERY; GENE TRANSFECTION; HIGH-SPEED VIDEO; IMAGE CONTRASTS; MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; MICROBUBBLES; NONMAGNETICS; THEORETICAL MODELLING; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENTS; ULTRASOUND EXPOSURE;

DRUG DELIVERY; GENE THERAPY; GENES; HIGH SPEED CAMERAS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MOLECULAR IMAGING; STARS; ULTRASONICS;

NANOPARTICLES;

NANOPARTICLE; SONOVUE;

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LINEAR SCATTERING TO ATTENUATION RATIO; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC MICROBUBBLE; MICROBUBBLE; OSCILLATION; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND; VIDEO MICROSCOPY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, RADIATION; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROBUBBLES; MODELS, CHEMICAL; RADIATION DOSAGE;

EID: 84859363546     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: 1879291X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.01.027     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alter J., Sennoga C.A., Lopes D.M., Eckersley R.J., Wells D.J. Microbubble stability is a major determinant of the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubble mediated in vivo gene transfer. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:976-984.
2. Apfel R.E. Acoustic cavitation inception (Acoustic cavitation series: Part four). Ultrasonics 1984, 22:167-173.
3. Bekeredjian R., Grayburn P.A., Shohet R.V. Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:329-335.
4. Bohmer M.R., Schroeders R., Steenbakkers J.A.M., de Winter S.H.P.M., Duineveld P.A., Lub J., Nijssen W.P.M., Pikkemaat J.A., Stapert H.R. Preparation of monodisperse polymer particles and capsules by ink-jet printing. Colloids Surfaces A 2006, 289:96-104.
5. Borden M.A., Pu G., Runner G.J., Longo M.L. Surface phase behavior and microstructure of lipid/PEG-emulsifier monolayer-coated microbubbles. Colloids Surfaces B 2004, 35:209-223.
6. Bouakaz A., de Jong N., Cachard C. Standard properties of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 1998, 24:469-472.
7. Chang M.W., Stride E.P.J., Edirisinghe M.J. Controlling the thickness of hollow polymeric mircrospheres prepared by electrohydrodynamic atomization. J R Soc Interface 2010, 7:S377-S378.
8. Chen H., Kreider W., Brayman A.A., Bailey M.R., Matula T. Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys Rev Lett 2011, 106:034301.
9. Chetty K., Stride E., Sennoga C.A., Hajnal J.V., Eckersley R.J. High-speed optical observations and simulation results of SonoVue microbubbles at low-pressure insonation. IEEE Trans Ultrasonics Ferroelectr Freq Cont 2008, 55:1333-1342.
10. Church C.C. The effects of an elastic solid-surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas-bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am 1995, 97:1510-1521.
11. Commander K.W., Prosperetti A. Linear pressure waves in bubbly liquids: Comparison between theory and experiments. J Acoust Soc Am 1989, 85:732-746.
12. Glazman R.E. Effects of adsorbed films on gas bubble radial oscillations. J Acoust Soc Am 1983, 74:980-986.
13. Gorce J., Arditi M., Schneider M. Influence of bubble size distribution on the echogenicity of ultrasound contrast agents: A study of SonoVue. Invest Radiol 2000, 35:661-671.
14. Hernot S., Klibanov A.L. Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008, 60:1153-1166.
15. Karshafian R., Bevan P.D., Williams R., Samac S., Burns P.N. Sonoporation by ultrasound-activated microbubble contrast agents: Effect of acoustic exposure parameters on cell membrane permeability and cell viability. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:847-860.
16. Kinoshita M., Hynynen K. Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: The importance of standing wave in sonoporation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007, 359:860-865.
17. Klibanov A.L. Ultrasound molecular imaging with targeted microbubble contrast agents. J Nucl Cardiol 2007, 14:876-884.
18. Kooiman K., Foppen-Harteveld M., der Steen A.F., de Jong N. Sonoporation of endothelial cells by vibrating targeted microbubbles. J Control Release 2011, 154:35-41.
19. Leighton T.G. The acoustic bubble 1994, Academic Press, London.
20. Li T.L., Tachibana K., Kuroki M. Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: Comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice-Initial results. Radiology 2003, 229:423-428.
21. Li Y.S., Davidson E., Reid C.N., McHale A.P. Optimising ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in vitro and prolonged expression of a transgene in vivo: Potential applications for gene therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett 2009, 273:62-69.
22. Marmottant P., van der Meer S., Emmer M., Versluis M., de Jong N., Hilgenfeldt S., Lohse D. A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am 2005, 118:3499-3505.
23. Marmottant P., Biben T., Hilgenfeldt S. Deformation and rupture of lipid vesicles in the strong shear flow generated by ultrasound-driven microbubbles. Proc R Soc 2008, 464:1781-1800.
24. Martynov S., Stride E., Saffari N. The natural frequencies of microbubble oscillation in elastic vessels. J Acoust Soc Am 2009, 126:2963-2972.
25. Mulvana H., Stride E., Hajnal J.V., Eckersley R.J. Temperature dependent behavior of ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010, 36:925-934.
26. Mulvana H., Eckersley R.J., Browning R., Tang M., Pankhurst Q., Wells D.J., Stride E. Enhanced gene transfection in vivo using magnetic localisation of ultrasound contrast agents. Proc IEEE Int Ultrason Symp 2010, (in press).
27. Postema M., Van Wamel A., Lancee C., de Jong N. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol 2004, 30:827-840.
28. Qin S.P., Ferrara K.W. Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51:5065-5088.
29. Rahim A., Taylor S.L., Bush N.L., ter Haar G.R., Bamber J.C., Porter C.D. Physical parameters affecting ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery efficiency in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 2006, 32:1269-1279.
30. Sarkar K., Shi W., Chatterjee D., Forsberg F. Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2005, 118:539-550.
31. Sennoga C.A., Mahue V., Loughran J., Casey J., Seddon J.M., Tang M., Eckersley R.J. On sizing and counting of microbubbles using optical microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 2010, 36:2093-2096.
32. Stride E. The influence of surface adsorption on microbubble dynamics. Phil Trans R Soc A 2008, 366:2103-2115.
33. Stride E., Pancholi K., Edirisinghe M.J., Samarasinghe S. Increasing the nonlinear character of microbubble oscillations at low acoustic pressures. J R Soc Interface 2008, 5:807-811.
34. Stride E., Porter C., Prieto A.G., Pankhurst Q. Enhancement of microbubble mediated gene delivery by simultaneous exposure to ultrasonic and magnetic fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009, 35:861-868.
35. Talu E., Hettiarachchi K., Nguyen H., Lee A.P., Powell R.L., Longo M.L., Dayton P. Lipid-stabilized monodisperse microbubbles produced by flow focusing for use as ultrasound contrast agents. IEEE Ultrason Symp Proc 2006, 1-5:1568-1571.
36. Vlaskou D., Mykhaylyk O., Krotz F., Hellwig N., Renner R., Schillinger U., Gleich B., Heidsieck A., Georg Schmitz G., Hensel K., Plank C. Magnetic and acoustically active lipospheres for magnetically targeted nucleic acid delivery. Adv Functional Materials 2010, 20:3881-3894.
37. Vos H., Dollet B., Bosch J.G., Versluis M., de Jong N. Nonspherical vibrations of microbubbles in contact with a wall-A pilot study at low mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008, 34:685-688.
38. Vos H., Dollet B., Versluis M., de Jong N. Nonspherical shape oscillations of coated microbubbles in contact with a wall. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:935-948.
39. Widder K., Flouret G., Senyei A. Magnetic microspheres-Synthesis of a novel parenteral drug carrier. J Pharm Sci 1979, 68:79-82.
40. Zhang M., Fabiilli M.L., Haworth K.J., Padilla F., Swanson S.D., Kripfgans O.D., Carson P.L., Fowlkes J.B. Acoustic droplet vaporization for enhancement of thermal ablation by high intensity focused ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2011, 18:1123-1132.