Using a "Sustainable Solution Space" Approach to Develop a Vision of Sustainable Accessibility in a Low-Income Community in Phoenix, Arizona

International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 298-319

  Machler, Leonard ^a   Golub, Aaron ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

accessibility; collaborative research; sustainable transport planning

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; ARIZONA; COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH; COMPLEX SYSTEM DYNAMICS; LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES; SKY HARBORS; SOLUTION SPACE; SUSTAINABLE ACCESSIBILITY; SUSTAINABLE SOLUTION; SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT PLANNING; TRANSPORT SYSTEMS; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRAVEL BEHAVIORS; URBAN AREAS;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING;

TRANSPORTATION;

ACCESSIBILITY; LOW INCOME POPULATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

ARIZONA; PHOENIX; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84859302654     PISSN: 15568318     EISSN: 15568334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2011.605210     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Arnstein S. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planning 35: 216-224.
2. Bertolini L, LeClercq F, Kapoen L. 2005. Sustainable accessibility: A conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward. Transport Policy 12: 207-220.
3. Black WR. 2005. Sustainable Transport: Definitions and Responses. pp. 35-43 in Integrating Sustainability into the Transportation Planning Process. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
4. Boschmann EE, Kwan M.-P. 2008. Toward socially sustainable urban transportation: Progress and potentials. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 2 (3): 138-157.
5. Bossel H. 1999. Indicators for sustainable development: Theory, method, applications. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
6. Bullard RD, Johnson GS, Torres AO. 2004. Highway robbery: Transportation racism and new routes to equity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
7. Cervero R. 2001. Integration of urban transport and urban planning. In: Freire M, Stren RE (eds.), The Challenge of Urban Government: Policies and Practices. Washington, DC: The World Bank Institute, pp. 407-427.
8. Cervero R, Kockelman K. 1997. Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Resources Board D 2 (3): 199-219.
9. Checkoway B, Richards-Schuster K. 2003. Youth participation in community evaluation research. American Journal of Evaluation Research 24: 21-33.
10. Corburn J. 2005. Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
11. Cutts BB, Darby KJ, Boone CG, Brewis A. 2009. City structure, obesity and environmental justice: An integrated analysis of physical and social barriers to walkable streets and park access. Social Science and Medicine 69: 1314-1322.
12. Garrett M, Taylor B. 1999. Reconsidering social equity in public transit. Berkeley Planning Journal 13: 6-27.
13. Geels FW. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33: 897-920.
14. Gibbs L. 1993. Foreword. pp. ix-xi in Hofrichter R (ed.), Toxic Struggles: The Theory and Practice of Environmental Justice. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
15. Gibson RE. 2006. Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 (3): 170-182.
16. Gudmundsson H, Höjer M. 1996. Sustainable development principles and their implications for transport. Ecological Economics 19: 269-282.
17. Handy S. 2005. Planning for accessibility: In theory and in practice. In: Krizek KJ, Levinson DM (eds.), Access to Destinations. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 131-147.
18. Innes JE. 1990. Knowledge and Public Policy: The Search for Meaningful Indicators. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
19. Innes J, Booher DE. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
20. Jackson MC.2004. Community operational research: Purposes, theory and practice. In: Gerald Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 57-74.
21. Johnson MP. 2001. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: A survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environment and Planning A 33: 717-735.
22. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, et al. 2001. Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science 292: 641-642.
23. Kenworthy JR. 2006. The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment and Urbanization 18 (1): 67-85.
24. Krizek KJ. 2005. Perspectives on accessibility and travel. In: Krizek KJ, Levinson DM (eds.), Access to Destinations. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 109-130.
25. LeClercq F, Bertolini L. 2003. Achieving sustainable accessibility: An evaluation of policy measures in the Amsterdam area. Built Environment 29: 36-47.
26. Litman T. 2007. Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning. Transportation Research, 2017 (8): 10-15.
27. LKC Consulting Inc. 2003. Regional transit system study: Final report (July 2003). Maricopa Association of Governments, Phoenix, Arizona.
28. Loorbach D. 2007. Transition Management: New Mode of Governance for Sustainable Development. Utrecht: International Books.
29. Machler L. 2010. Sustainable access visioning in a central Phoenix neighborhood. Masters thesis, Arizona State University.
30. Midgely G, Ochoa-Arias AE. 2004. An introduction to community operational research. In: Midgley G, Ochoa-Arias AE (eds.), Community Operational Research: OR and Systems Thinking for Community Development. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum, pp. 1-38.
31. National Highway Traffic Safety Association (NHTSA). 2008. 2008 Traffic safety annual assessment-highlights (DOT HS 811 172). Washington, DC: NHTSA National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
32. Painter K. 1996. The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark. Landscape and Urban Planning 35 (2-3): 193-201.
33. Pisarski AE. 2006. Commuting in America III: The third national report on commuting patterns and trends. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
34. Potschin M, Haines-Young R. 2008. Sustainability impact assessments: Limits, thresholds and the sustainability choice space. In: Helbing K, Pérez-Soba M, Tabbush P (eds.), Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes. Berlin: Springer, pp. 425-450.
35. Ravetz J. 2000. Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20:31-64.
36. Robinson J. 2003. Future subjunctive: Backcasting as social learning. Futures 35: 839-856.
37. Scholz RW, Tietje O. 2002. Formative scenario analysis. pp. 79-116 in Scholz RW, Tietje O (eds.), Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38. Shay E, Khattak A. 2010. Toward sustainable transport: Conventional and disruptive approaches in the U.S. context. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 4 (1): 14-40.
39. Speerli V. 2004. Sustainability Solution Space für die Entwicklung von Thalwil (Sustainable Solution Space for the Development of Thalwil). Master's Thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
40. Tietje O. 2005. Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenarios. European Journal of Operational Research 162 (2): 418-432.
41. Tilly C, Moss P, Kirschenman J, Kennelly I. 2001. Space as a signal: How employers perceive neighborhoods in four metropolitan labor markets. In: O'Connor A, Tilly C, Bobo LD (eds.), Urban Inequality: Evidence from Four Cities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 304-338.
42. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 2007. 2000 Census. Available at http://www.census.gov
43. Vester F. 2007. The Art of Interconnected Thinking: Ideas and Tools for Tackling with Complexity. Munich: MCB Verlag.
44. Whitt JA, Yago G. 1985. Corporate strategies and the decline of transit in U.S. cities. Urban Affairs Quarterly 21: 37-65.
45. Wiek A, Binder C. 2005. Solution spaces for decision-making: A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 589-608.
46. Wiek A, Speerli V, Binder C, Machler L. Forthcoming. Indicators, targets, and consistency: Participatory sustainability visioning for urban development.
47. Wilson WJ. 1996. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Vintage.
48. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49. World Health Organization. 2009. Global Status on Road Safety: Time for Action. (WA 275). Geneva: World Health Organization.