Brain Type or Sex Differences? A structural equation model of the relation between brain type, sex, and motivation to learn science

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 779-802

  Zeyer, Albert ^a   Bölsterli, Katrin ^b   Brovelli, Dorothee ^b   Odermatt, Freia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b University of Teacher Education of Central Switzerland   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Brain type; Cognition; Gender; Motivation; Quantitative research; Secondary school; Sex

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859295678     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.635165     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aikenhead, G. S. 2000. "Renegotiating the culture of school science. The contribution of research". In Improving science education, Edited by: Millar, R., Leach, J. and Osborne, J. 245-264. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
2. Aikenhead, G. S. 2001. Students' ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2): 180-188.
3. Airbuckle, J. L. 2007. AMOS user's guide. Version 16.0, Chicago, IL: Smallwaters.
4. Bandura, A. 2001. Social cognitive theory: An agentive perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52: 1-26.
5. Baron-Cohen, S. 1999. Can studies of autism teach us about consciousness of the physical and the mental?. Philosophical Explorations, 2(3): 175-188.
6. Baron-Cohen, S. 2002. The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 248-254.
7. Baron-Cohen, S. 2003. The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain, London: Penguin.
8. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R. and Belmonte, M. K. 2005. Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Science, 310(5749): 819-823.
9. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N. and Wheelwright, S. 2003. The systemizing quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358(1430): 361-374.
10. Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. 2004. The empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2): 163-175.
11. Billington, J., Baron-Cohen, S. and Wheelwright, S. 2007. Cognitive style predicts entry into physical sciences and humanities: Questionnaire and performance tests of empathy and systemizing. Learning and Individual Differences, 17: 260-268.
12. Bollen, K. A. 2002. Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53: 605-634.
13. Britner, S. L. 2008. Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8): 955-970.
14. Brown, T. A. 2006. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15. Byrne, B. M. 2010. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Cheung, G. W. and Rensvold, R. B. 2002. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9: 233-255.
17. Cohen, J. 1988. Power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
18. Cramer, D. 1998. Fundamental statistics for social research, London: Routledge.
19. Davis, M. H. 1980. A multidimensional approach to individual diferences in empathy. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(4): 85-89.
20. De Beuckelaer, A. (2005). Measurement invariance issues in international management research. (PhD dissertation No. D/2005/2451/1, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium).
21. Dimmock, C. 2000. Designing the learning-centred school: A cross-cultural perspective, London: Sage Publications.
22. Dimmock, C. 2007. "Cross-cultural differences in interpreting and conducting research". In Research methods in educational leadership and management, Edited by: Briggs, A. R.J. and Coleman, M. 53-68. London: Sage Publications.
23. Eisenberg, N. 2002. "Empathy-related emotional responses, altruism, and their socialization". In Visions of compassion: Western scientists and Tibetan Buddhists examine human nature, Edited by: Davidson, R. J. and Harrington, A. 131-164. London: Oxford University Press.
24. Gardner, P. L. 1995. Measuring attitudes to science: Unidimensionality and internal consistency revisited. Research in Science Education, 25(3): 283-289.
25. Gardner, P. L. 1996. The dimensionality of attitude scales: A widely misunderstood idea. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8): 913-919.
26. Glynn, S. M. and Koballa, T. R. 2006. "Motivation to learn in college science". In Handbook of college science teaching, Edited by: Mintzes, J. J. and Leonard, W. H. 25-32. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
27. Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G. and Brickman, P. 2007. Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8): 1088-1107.
28. Haste, H. 2004. Science in my future: A study of values and beliefs in relation to science and technology amongst 11-21 year olds. Report 1, London: Nestlé Social Research Programme.
29. Hirschfeld, L. A. and Gelman, S. A. 1994. Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30. Jöreskog, K. G. 1993. "Testing structural equation models". In Testing structural equation models, Edited by: Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S. 294-325. Newburry Park, CA: Sage.
31. Kim, K. H. 2005. The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3): 368-390.
32. Osborne, J. and Dillon, J. 2008. Science education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation, London: King's College.
33. Osborne, J., Simon, S. and Collins, S. 2003. Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9): 1049-1079.
34. Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J. and Fraser, B. J. 1996. Gender, science and mathematics: Shortening the shadow, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
35. PISA. 2006. Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006, Paris: OECD.
36. Rennie, L. J. 2000. Equity in science education: Gender is just one variable: Reply to Atwater. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4): 391-393.
37. Riding, R. and Rayner, S. 1998. Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour, London: Fulton Publishers.
38. Rigby, C. S., Deci, E. L., Patrick, B. C. and Ryan, R. M. 1992. Beyond the intrinsic-extrinsic dichotomy: Self-determination in motivation and learning. Motivation and Emotion, 16: 165-185.
39. Rocard, M. C., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H. and Hemmo, V. R. 2007. Science education NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe, Brüssel: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research, Science, Economy and Society.
40. Sadler, T. D. 2004. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5): 513-536.
41. Schmitt, N. 1996. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4): 350-353.
42. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Uchiyama, T., Yoshida, Y. and Wheelwright, S. 2007. Empathizing and systemizing in adults with and without autism spectrum conditions: Cross-cultural stability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37: 1823-1832.
43. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D.Weil, L. 2006. Development of short forms of the empathy quotient (EQ-short) and the systemizing quotient (SQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41: 929-940.
44. Weinburgh, M. 1995. Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(4): 387-398.
45. Wellman, H. 1990. The child's theory of mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Wheelwright, S., Baron-Cohen, S., Goldenfeld, N., Delaney, J., Fine, D., Smith, R. and Wakabayashi, A. 2006. Predicting autism apectrum quotient (AQ) from the systemizing quotient-revised (SQ-R) and empathy quotient (EQ). Brain Research, 1079: 47-56.
47. Witkin, H. A. and Goodenough, D. R. 1981. Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Field dependence and field independence, New York, NY: International University Press.
48. Zeldin, A. L., Britner, S. L. and Pajares, F. 2008. A comparative study of the self-efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9): 1036-1058.
49. Zhang, L.-F. and Sternberg, R. J. 2006. The nature of intellectual styles, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
50. Zeyer, A. 2010. Motivation to learn science and cognitive style. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 6(2): 123-130.
51. Zeyer, A. and Wolf, S. 2010. Is there a relationship between brain type, sex and motivation to learn science?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16): 2217-2233.