Characterization of surface hydrophobicity of engineered nanoparticles

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 215-216, Issue , 2012, Pages 146-151

  Xiao, Yao ^a,b   Wiesner, Mark R ^a,b  

^a Duke University   (United States)

^b Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnologies (CEINT)   (United States)

Author keywords

Adsorption; Contact angle; Nanoparticles; Octanol water affinity coefficient; Surface hydrophobicity

Indexed keywords

AFFINITY COEFFICIENT; CHARACTERIZATION METHODS; FULLEROLS; GUM ARABIC; HYDROPHOBIC MOLECULES; KEY DETERMINANTS; NANO SCALE; NANO-AU; OCTANOL-WATER AFFINITY COEFFICIENT; OCTANOL-WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENT; ORGANIC MOLECULES; POLY VINYL PYRROLIDONE; ROSE BENGAL; SESSILE DROP METHOD; SURFACE ADSORPTION; SURFACE COATINGS; SURFACE HYDROPHOBICITY; WATER PHASIS;

ADSORPTION; COATINGS; CONTACT ANGLE; NANOPARTICLES; NAPHTHALENE; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

HYDROPHOBICITY;

CARBON; FULLEROL; GUM ARABIC; NANOMATERIAL; NANOPARTICLE; NAPHTHALENE; OCTANOL; ORGANIC COMPOUND; POVIDONE; ROSE BENGAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ADSORPTION; ALCOHOL; BIOFILM; COATING; DYE; FURAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NAPHTHALENE; PARTICULATE MATTER; TOXICITY;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; HYDROPHOBICITY; ISOTHERM; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADSORPTION; CITRATES; COLORING AGENTS; FULLERENES; FURANS; GOLD; GUM ARABIC; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; NANOPARTICLES; NAPHTHALENES; ROSE BENGAL; SILVER; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ACACIA SENEGAL;

EID: 84859265984     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.02.043     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Wiesner M.R., Lowry G.V., Alvarez P., Dionysiou D., Biswas P. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:4337-4345.
2. Hassellov M., Readman J.W., Ranville J.F., Tiede K. Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:344-361.
3. Acosta E. Bioavailability of nanoparticles in nutrient and nutraceutical delivery. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 14:3-15.
4. Handy R.D., Owen R., Valsami-Jones E. The ecotoxicology of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: current status knowledge gaps, challenges, and future needs. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:315-325.
5. Moore M.N. Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?. Environ Int. 2006, 32:967-976.
6. Guzman K.A.D., Taylor M.R., Banfield J.F. Environmental risks of nanotechnology: national nanotechnology initiative funding 2000-2004. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:1401-1407.
7. Kostarelos K., Lacerda L., Pastorin G., Wu W., Wieckowski S., Luangsivilay J., Godefroy S., Pantarotto D., Briand J.-P., Muller S., Prato M., Bianco A. Cellular uptake of functionalized carbon nanotubes is independent of functional group and cell type. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2:108-113.
8. Verma A., Uzun O., Hu Y., Hu Y., Han H.-S., Watson N., Chen S., Irvine D.J., Stellacci F. Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7:588-595.
9. Biswas P., Wu C.-Y. Nanoparticles and the environment. J. Waste Manage. Assoc. 2005, 55:708-746.
10. Schmid K., Riediker M. Use of nanoparticles in Swiss industry: a targeted survey. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:2253-2260.
11. Hauck T.S., Ghazani A.A., Chan W.C.W. Assessing the effect of surface chemistry on gold nanorod uptake, toxicity, and gene expression in mammalian cells. Small 2008, 4:153-159.
12. Clift M.J.D., Rothen-Rutishauser B., Brown D.M., Duffin R., Donaldson K., Proudfoot L., Guy K., Stone V. The impact of different nanoparticle surface chemistry and size on uptake and toxicity in a murine macrophage cell line. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 232:418-427.
13. Butt H.-J., Graf K., Kappl M. Physics and Chemistry of Interface 2003, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
14. Drelich J., Miller J.D., Good R.J. The effect of drop (bubble) size on advancing and receding contact angles for heterogeneous and rough solid surfaces as observed with sessile-drop and captive-bubble techniques. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1996, 179:37-50.
15. Deak A., Hild E., Kovacs A.L., Horvolgyi Z. Contact angle determination of nanoparticles: film balance and scanning angle reflectometry studies. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2007, 9:6359-6370.
16. Yan N., Maham Y., Masliyah J.H., Gray M.R., Mather A.E. Measurement of contact angles for fumed silica nanospheres using enthalpy of immersion data. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 228:1-6.
17. Paunov V.N. Novel method for determining the three-phase contact angle of colloid particles adsorbed at air-water and oil-water interfaces. Langmuir 2003, 19:7970-7976.
18. Sangster J. Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients: Fundamentals and Physical Chemistry 1997, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
19. Brant J.A., Labille J., Bottero J.-Y., Wiesner M.R. Characterizing the impact of preparation method on fullerene cluster structure and chemistry. Langmuir 2006, 22:3878-3885.
20. Muller R.H., Ruhl D., Luck M., Paulke B.R. Influence of fluorescent labelling of polystyrene particles on phagocytic uptake surface hydrophobicity, and plasma protein adsorption. Pharm. Res. 1997, 14:18-24.
21. Jung T., Kamm W., Breitenbach A., Klebe G., Kissel T. Loading of tetanus toxoid to biodegradable nanoparticles from branched poly(Sulfobutyl-Polyvinyl Alcohol)-g-(Lactide-Co-Glycolide) nanoparticles by protein adsorption: a mechanistic study. Pharm. Res. 2002, 19:1105-1113.
22. Thiele L., Merkle H.P., Walter E. Phagocytosis and phagosomal fate of surface-modified microparticles in dendritic cells and macrophages. Pharm. Res. 2003, 20:221-228.
23. Rieux A.d., Ragnarsson E.G.E., Gullberg E., Próeat V.e., Schneider Y.-J., Artursson P. Transport of nanoparticles across an in vitro model of the human intestinal follicle associated epithelium. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2005, 25:455-465.
24. Yang K., Zhu L., Xing B. Adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by carbon nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40:1855-1861.
25. EPA On-line Tools for Estimating Henry's Law Constants 2011, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
26. 70 as surrogate standard. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170:555-561.
27. OW) and aqueous solubility. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5945-5950.
28. Chae S.-R., Badireddy A.R., Budarz J.F., Lin S., Xiao Y., Therezien M., Wiesner M.R. Heterogeneities in fullerene nanoparticle aggregates affecting reactivity, bioactivity, and transport. ACS Nano 2010, 4:5011-5018.
29. Muller R.H. Collidal Carriers for Controlled Drug Delivery and Targeting 1997, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
30. Gessner A., Lieske A., Paulke B.R., Müller R.H.M. Influence of surface charge density on protein adsorption on polymeric nanoparticles: analysis by two-dimensional electrophoresis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2002, 54:165-170.
31. Lin D., Xing B. Adsorption of phenolic compounds by carbon nanotubes: Role of aromaticity and substitution of hydroxyl groups. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:7254-7259.
32. Chen W., Duan L., Zhu D. Adsorption of polar and nonpolar organic chemicals to carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41:8295-8300.
33. A Databank of Evaluated Octanol-Water Partition Coefficients (Log P) 1985, Sangster Research Laboratories.
34. Lowry G.V., Casman E.A. Nanomaterial Transport Transformation and Fate in the Environment 2009, Springer, Netherlands.
35. Crane M., Handy R. An Assessment of Regulatory Testing Strategies and Methods for Characterizing the Ecotoxicological Hazards of Nanomaterials 2007.