Effects of a violation of an expected increase or decrease in intensity on detection of change within an auditory pattern

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 77, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 438-445

  Macdonald, Margaret ^a   Campbell, Kenneth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Change detector system; Decrements; Event related potentials Mismatch Negativity (MMN); Increments; Intensity change; Transient detector system

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHANGE DETECTOR SYSTEM; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SOUND DETECTION; SOUND INTENSITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSIENT DETECTOR SYSTEM; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; HEARING; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 84859248863     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.014     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alain, C., Woods, D. L., & Ogawa, K. H. (1994). Brain indices of automatic pattern processing. Neuroreport, 6, 140-144.
2. Alho, K., Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1989). Eventrelated brain potentials reflecting processing of relevant and irrelevant stimuli during selective listening. Psychophysiology, 26, 514-528.
3. Bach, D., Schachinger, H., Neuhoff, J., Esposito, F., Di Salle, F., Lehmann, C., et al. (2007). Rising sound intensity as an intrinsic warning cue. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 145-150.
4. Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8447-8451.
5. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bregman, A. S., Ahad, P. A., Crum, P. A., & O'Reilly, J. (2000). Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 626-636.
7. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
8. Freiberg, K., Tually, K., & Crassini, B. (2001). Use of an auditory looming task to test infants' sensitivity to sound pressure level as an auditory distance cue. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 1-10.
9. Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Sussman, E., & Winkler, I. (2001). Simultaneously active preattentive representations of local and global rules for sound sequences in the human brain. Cognitive Brain Research, 12, 131-144.
10. Jacobsen, T., Horencamp, T., & Schröger, E. (2003). Preattentive memory-based comparison of sound intensity. Audiology and Neurotology, 8, 338-346.
11. Macdonald, M., Jamshidi, P., & Campbell, K. (2008). Infrequent increases in stimulus intensity may interrupt central executive functioning during Rapid Eye Movement sleep. Neuroreport, 19, 309-313.
12. Maier, J., & Ghazanfar, A. (2007). Looming biases in monkey auditory cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4093-4100.
13. May, P., & Tiitinen, H. (2010). Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology, 47, 66-122.
14. Moore, B. C. J., & Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320-333.
15. Muller-Gass, A., Macdonald, M., Schröger, E., Sculthorpe, L., & Campbell, K. (2007). Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention. Brain Research, 1170, 71-78.
16. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201-288.
17. Näätänen, R., Kujala, T., & Winkler, I. (2011). Auditory processing that leads to conscious perception: A unique window to central auditory processing opened by the mismatch negativity and related responses. Psychophysiology, 48, 4-22.
18. Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25, 262-268.
19. Paavilainen, P., Degerman, A., Takegata, R., & Winkler, I. (2003). Spectral and temporal stimulus characteristics in the processing of abstract auditory features. Neuroreport, 14, 715-718.
20. Paavilainen, P., Jaramillo, M., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Binaural information can converge in abstract memory traces. Psychophysiology, 35, 483-487.
21. Pakarinen, S., Takegata, R., Rinne, T., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2007). Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 177-185.
22. Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Degerman, A., Schröger, E., & Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135-143.
23. Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Roeber, U. (2007). Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PloS One, 2, e1131.
24. Sculthorpe, L., Collin, C., & Campbell, K. (2008). The influence of strongly focused visual attention on the detection of change in an auditory pattern. Brain Research, 1234, 78-86.
25. Snyder, J. S., & Alain, C. (2007). Toward a neurophysiological theory of auditory stream segregation. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 780-799.
26. Sussman, E., Ritter, W., & Vaughan, H. G. Jr., (1998). Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Research, 789, 130-138.
27. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., Huotilainen, M., Ritter, W., & Näätänen, R. (2002). Topdown effects can modify the initially stimulus-driven auditory organization. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 393-405.
28. Todd, J., Myers, R., Pirillo, R., & Drysdale, K. (2010). Neuropsychological correlates of auditory perceptual inference. A mismatch negativity (MMN) study. Brain Research, 1310, 113-123.
29. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill.
30. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity (MMN). Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147-163.
31. Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: Predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532-540.
32. Winkler, I., Takegata, R., & Sussman, E. (2005). Event-related brain potentials reveal multiple stages in the perceptual organization of sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 291-299.
33. Woestenburg, J. C., Verbaten, M. N., & Slangen, J. L. (1983). The removal of the eyemovement artifact from the EEG by regression analysis in the frequency domain. Biological Psychology, 16, 127-147.