Specifying an inclusive model of product-user interaction

DS 58-4: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 143-154

  Mieczakowski, Anna ^a   Langdon, Patrick ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conceptual graph analysis; Inclusive design; Mental models; Product user interaction

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL GRAPH; FUNCTIONAL PARTS; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MENTAL MODEL; PRODUCT-USER INTERACTION; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WASHERS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84859236928     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Vanderheiden, G. C. Thirty-something million: should they be exceptions? Human Factors, 1990, 32(4), 383-396.
2. British Standards Institute, British Standard 7000-6:2005. Design Management Systems: Managing Inclusive Design. Guide. http://www.bsi-global.com/ en/Shop/Publication-Detail/?pid=000000000030142267 (2005)
3. Birchard, J. A., Coleman, R. and Langdon, P. Does my stigma look big in this? Considering acceptability and desirability in the inclusive design of technology products. Universal Access in HCI, Part 1, pp. 622-631 (2007).
4. Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J. A framework for analytical inclusive design evaluation. 16th International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 817-818. (Paris, France, 2007c).
5. Ricability. Easier living: a guide for older and disabled people living in London. http://www.ricability.org.uk/reports/pdfs/easierliving.pdf (2001).
6. Coleman, R. Designing for our future selves. In: Preiser, W. F. E. and Ostroff, E. Universal Design Handbook, pp. 4.1-4.25. (MacGraw-Hill, New York, 2001).
7. ADA. Americans with Disabilities Act. (U.S. Department of Justice, 1990).
8. DDA. The Disability Discrimination Act. Report: Office of Public Sector Information. http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/actsl995/ukpga-19950050-en-l (1995).
9. Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J. Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2007a, 6(2), 119-135.
10. Dray, S. M. Structured observation: techniques for gathering information about users in their own world. CHI, 334-335 (April 13-18, 1996).
11. Bellerby, F. and Davis, G. Defining the limits of inclusive design. Proceedings of Include 2003, pp.l:00-l:17. (Royal College of Art, London, 2003).
12. Goodman, J., Langdon, P. M. and Clarkson, P. J. Providing strategic user information for designers: methods and initial findings. In: Clarkson, J., Langdon, P. and Robinson, P., (eds.) Designing Accessible Technology, pp. 41-51. (Springer, 2006).
13. Norman D. A. Cognitive engineering. In: Norman, D A., and Draper, S.W. (Eds) User centered system design: new perspectives on human computer interaction. (Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum Associates, 1986).
14. Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things. (Basic Books, London, 2002).
15. Blackler, A. Intuitive interaction with complex artefacts. (PhD Thesis, School of Design, Queensland University of Technology, 2006)
16. Craik, K. J. W. The nature of explanation (Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 1943).
17. Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental models in cognitive science. In: Norman, D. A. (ed.). Perspectives on cognitive science, pp. 147-187. (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1981).
18. Krippendorff, K. On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that design is making sense (of things). Design Issues, 1989, 5(2), 9-39.
19. Norman, D. Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. (eds.).Mental models. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, 1983).
20. Freudenthal, A. The design of home appliances for young and old consumers. (PhD Thesis, Delft University Press, The Netherlands, 1999).
21. Canas, J. J., Antoli, A. and Quesada, J.F. The role of working memory on measuring mental models of physical systems. Psicologica, 2001, 22, 25-42.
22. Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P. J., Brown, D. Cognitive scales and mental models for inclusive design. Proceedings of HCI International 2007. (Beijing, China, 2007b).
23. Carroll, J. M. and Thomas, J. C. Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. In: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1982, 12, 107-116.
24. Langdon, P. M., Lewis, T. and Clarkson, P. J. The effects of prior experience on the use of consumer products. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2007, 6(2), 179-191 (1615-5289).
25. Rutherford, A. and Wilson, J.R. Models of mental models: an ergonomist-psychologist dialogue. In: Trauber, M.J. and D. Ackermann. Mental models and human-computer interaction 2. (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland, 1991).
26. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. and Carey, T. Human Computer Interaction. (Addison Wesley, London, 1994).
27. Anderson, J. R. "Language, memory and thought" (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1976).
28. Turban, E. and Aronson, J. Decision support systems and intelligent systems. (Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1988).
29. Budgen, D. Software design. (Pearson Addison Wesley, London, 2003).
30. Stanton, N. A. and Baber, C. Validating task analysis for error identification: reliability and validity of a human error prediction technique. Ergonomics, 2005, 48(9), 1097-1113.
31. Maiden, N. A. M. and Rugg, G. ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal, 1996, 11, 183-192.
32. nd edition. (Prentice Hall, Bath, 1998).
33. nd edition. (MIT Press, Boston, 1993).
34. Yourdon, E. Modern structured analysis. (Prentice Hall, New York, 1989).
35. Harel, D. Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming, 1987, 8, 231-274.
36. Coad, P. and Yourdon, E. Object-oriented analysis. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990).
37. Thimbleby, H. Press on: principles of interaction programming. (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007).
38. Gordon, S. E., Schmierer, K. A., Gill, R. T. Conceptual graph analysis: knowledge acquisition for instructional system design. Human Factors, 1993, 35,459-481.
39. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. Judgment under certainty: heuristics and biases. Science, New Series, 1974, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
40. Perkins, D. N. The mind's best work. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981).