A framework for analytical inclusive design evaluation

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Persad, Umesh ^a   Langdon, Patrick ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analytic evaluation; Inclusive design; User capability

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC EVALUATION; ANALYTICAL EVALUATION; CURRENT DATA; DATA COLLECTION; DESIGN OF PRODUCT; FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITIES; INCLUSIVE DESIGN; NUMBER OF PEOPLES; PRODUCT USABILITY; USER CAPABILITY;

CONSUMER PRODUCTS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84862626000     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Keates, S. and Clarkson, J. Countering design exclusion - An introduction to inclusive design. (Springer, 2003).
2. Clarkson, J. and Keates, S. A framework for minimising design exclusion. Include 2003 - Inclusive design for society and business, pp. 10:390 - 310:395London, 2003).
3. Clarkson, J. and Keates, S. User capabilities and product demands. Include 2003 - Inclusive design for society and business, pp. 10:384 - 310:388London, 2003).
4. Pirkl, J.J. and Babic, A.L. Guidelines and Strategies for Designing Transgenerational Products: A Resource Manual for Industrial Design Professionals. (Copley Publishing Group, 1988).
5. Vanderheiden, G.C. and Vanderheiden, K. Guidelines for the Design of Consumer Products to Increase Their Accessibility to People with Disabilities - Working Draft 1.7. (Trace R & D Center, 1992).
6. Poulson, D., Ashby, M. and Richardson, S., eds. USERfit A practical handbook on user-centred design for assistive technology. (HUSAT Research Institute, Loughborough, 1996).
7. Goodman, J., Langdon, P.M. and Clarkson, P.J. Providing Strategic User Information for Designers: Methods and Initial Findings. In Clarkson, J., Langdon, P. and Robinson, P., eds. Designing Accessible Technology, pp. 41-51 (Springer, 2006).
8. Dong, H. Barriers to Inclusive Design in the UK. Department of Engineering, p. 213 (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2004).
9. Hartson, H.R., Andre, T.S. and Williges, R.C. Criteria for Evaluating Usability Evaluation Methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2001, 13(4), 373-410.
10. Gyi, D.E., Sims, R.E., Porter, J.M., Marshall, R. and Case, K. Representing older and disabled people in virtual user trials: data collection methods. Applied Ergonomics, 2004, 35(5), 443 - 451.
11. Persad, U. and Clarkson, P.J. Characterising Users for Inclusive Design - Three Requirements. Include 2005 Royal College of Art, London, UK, 2005).
12. Carlsson, G., Iwarsson, S. and Sthål, A. The Personal Component of Accessibility at Group Level: Exploring the Complexity of Functional Capacity. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2002, 9, 100-108.
13. Card, S.K., Moran, T.P. and Newell, A. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc, 1983).
14. Cardoso, C. Design for Inclusivity: Assessing the Accessibility of Everyday Products. Department of Engineering, p. 241 (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2005).
15. Grundy, E., Ahlburg, D., Ali, M., Breeze, E. and Sloggett, A. Disability in Great Britain: Results from the 1996/97 disability follow-up to the family resources survey. (UK Department of Social Security, 1999).
16. Porter, J.M., Case, K., Marshall, R., Gyi, D. and Oliver, R.S.n. 'Beyond Jack and Jill': designing for individuals using HADRIAN. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2004, 33(3), 249-264.
17. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. (World Health Organization, 2001).
18. Jacko, J.A. and Vitense, H.S. A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 2001, 1(1), 56-79.
19. Petrie, H. Accessibility and usability requirements for ICTs for disabled and elderly people: a functional classification approach. In Nicolle, C. and Abascal, J., eds. Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI (Taylor & Francis, 2001).
20. Story, M.F., Muller, J.L. and Mace, R.L. The Universal Design File - Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. (The Center for Universal Design, 1998).
21. Meister, D. Behavioural analysis and measurement methods. (Wiley, New York; Chichester, 1985).
22. John, B.E. and Kieras, D.E. The GOMS Family of Analysis Techniques: Tools for Design and Evaluation, Human-Computer Interaction Institute Technical Report CMU-HCII-94-106. (School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1994).
23. Zachary, W., Campbell, G.E., Laughery, K.R., Glenn, F. and Cannon-Bowers, J.A. The application of human modeling technology to the design, evaluation and operation of complex systems. In Salas, E., ed. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering Research, pp. 199-247 (Elsevier Science Ltd., 2001).
24. Kondraske, G.V. A working model for human system-task interfaces. In Bronzino, J.D., ed. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, pp. 147-141 - 147-118 (CRC Press, 2000).
25. Fleishman, E.A. and Quaintance, M.K. Taxonomies of human performance - The description of human tasks. (Academic Press Inc., 1984).
26. Kondraske, G.V. Workplace Design: An Elemental Resource Approach to Task Analysis and Human Performance Measurements. Choice For All. ICAART'88. RESNA International Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Rehabilitation Technology, pp. 25-30Montreal, Canada, 1988).
27. Kondraske, G.V. Measurement tools and processes in rehabilitation engineering. In Bronzino, J.D., ed. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, pp. 145-141 - 145-116 (CRC Press, 2000).
28. Bridger, R.S. Introduction to ergonomics. (Taylor & Francis, 2003).
29. Karwowski, W. Achieving compatibility in human-computer interface design and evaluation. In Jacko, J.A. and Sears, A., eds. The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications (LEA, 2002).
30. Kwahk, J. and Han, S.H. A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. Applied Ergonomics, 2002, 33(5), 419 - 431.
31. Carroll, J.B. Human cognitive abilities: a survey of factor-analytic studies. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
32. Laughery, K.R., Archer, S. and Corker, K. Modeling Human Performance in Complex Systems. In Salvendy, G., ed. Handbook of industrial engineering: technology and operations management, pp. xxxiv, 2796 (Wiley, New York; Chichester, 2001).