Dimensions of psychosocial impairment: Construct validation of clinical scales with particular reference to the SCL-90-R;Faktoren psychosozialer Beeinträchtigung: Konstruktanalyse klinischer Skalen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der SCL-90-R

Diagnostica

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 75-86

  Tran, Ulrich S ^a   Walter, Thomas ^b   Remmel, Andreas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b Psychosomatisches Zentrum Waldviertel ^*  (Austria)

Author keywords

Multidimensional outcome evaluation; Psychotherapy; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859233000     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924/a00005     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bados, A., Gómez-Benito, J. & Balaguer, G. (2010). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait version: Does it really measure anxiety? Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 560-567.
2. Barkham, M., Evans, C., Margison, F. R., McGrath, G., Mellor- Clark, J., Milne, D. et al. (1998). The rationale for developing and implementing core outcome batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health, 7, 35-47. (Pubitemid 28254795)
3. Barkham, M., Margison, F., Leach, C., Lucock, M., Mellor-Clark, J., Evans, C. et al. (2001). Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: Towards practicebased evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184-196. (Pubitemid 32488277)
4. Becker, P. & Mohr, A. (2005). Psychometrische Argumente für die Verwendung untransformierter Skalenwerte im Inventar interpersonaler Probleme (IIP-D). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 34, 205-214. (Pubitemid 41128866)
5. Blanton, H. & Jaccard, J. (2006). Arbitrary metrics in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 27-41. (Pubitemid 43134220)
6. Bullinger, M. & Kirchberger, I. (1998). SF-36. Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
7. Doucette, A. & Wolf, A. W. (2009). Questioning the measurement precision of psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 374-389.
8. Elliot, R., Fox, C. M., Beltyukova, S. A., Stone, G. E., Gunderson, J. & Zhang, X. (2006). Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis of a measure of general clinical distress: The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 18, 359-372. (Pubitemid 44950880)
9. Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J. et al. (2002). Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51-60. (Pubitemid 34093626)
10. Franke, G. H. (2002). SCL-90-R. Die Symptom-Checkliste von L. R. Derogatis - Deutsche Version (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Beltz.
11. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische Therapie. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
12. Griffith, J. W., Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Mineka, S., Rose, R. D., Waters, A. M. et al. (2010). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological Medicine, 40, 1125-1136.
13. Halstead, J. E., Leach, C. & Rust, J. (2007). The development of a brief distress measure for the evaluation of psychotherapy and counseling (sPaCE). Psychotherapy Research, 17, 656-672. (Pubitemid 350011573)
14. Hamer, M., Stamatakis, E. & Steptoe, A. (2009). Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental health: the Scottish Health Survey. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43, 1111-1114.
15. Hannöver, W., Michael, A., Meyer, C., Rumpf, H.-J., Hapke, U. & John, U. (2004). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky und das Vorliegen einer psychiatrischen Diagnose. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 54, 179-186.
16. Hardt, J., Gerbershagen, H. U. & Franke, P. (2000). The Symptom Check-List, SCL-90-R: Its use and characteristics in chronic pain patients. European Journal of Pain, 4, 137-148. (Pubitemid 30470025)
17. Hautzinger, M., Bailer, M., Worall, H. & Keller, F. (1995). Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI) (2. Aufl.). Bern: Huber.
18. Hessel, A., Schumacher, J., Geyer, M. & Brähler, E. (2001). Symptom-Checkliste SCL-90-R: Testtheoretische Überprüfung und Normierung an einer bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Stichprobe. Diagnostica, 47, 27-39. (Pubitemid 33686408)
19. Horowitz, L., Strauß, B. & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme. Deutsche Version. Manual (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Beltz Test.
20. Hughes, J. & Barkham, M. (2005). Scoping the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, its derivatives and short forms: 1988-2004. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 475-496. (Pubitemid 43173681)
21. Jäger, S., Jagla, M., Morfeld, T. T., Witzke, O., Reimer, J. & Franke, G. H. (2009). Gesundheitsbezogene Lebensqualität bei Patienten nach Nierentransplantation - Lässt sich die Skalenstruktur des SF-36 replizieren? Diagnostica, 55, 245-254.
22. Kazdin, A. (2006). Arbitrary metrics: Implications for identifying evidence-based treatments. American Psychologist, 61, 42-49. (Pubitemid 43134221)
23. Kupfer, J., Brosig, B. & Brähler, E. (2001). Toronto-Alexithymie- Skala-26 - Deutsche Version. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
24. Lambert, M. J., Hannöver, W., Nisslmüller, K., Richard, M. & Kordy, H. (2002). Fragebogen zum Ergebnis von Psychotherapie: Zur Reliabilität und Validität der deutschen Übersetzung des Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2). Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 31, 40-47.
25. Laux, L., Glanzmann, P., Schaffner, P. & Spielberger, C. D. (1981). Das State-Trait-Angstinventar. Göttingen: Beltz.
26. Leach, C., Lucock, M., Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Noble, R. & Iveson, S. (2006). Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE-OM scores in routine clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 45, 153-166. (Pubitemid 43905197)
27. Leising, D., Grande, T. & Faber, R. (2009). The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20): A measure of general psychological distress. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 707-710.
28. Lutz, W., Schürch, E., Stulz, N., Böhnke, J. R., Schöttke, H., Rogner, J. et al. (2009). Entwicklung und psychometrische Kennwerte des Fragebogens zur Evaluation von Psychotherapieverläufen (FEP). Diagnostica, 55, 106-116.
29. Lutz, W., Tholen, S., Schürch, E. & Berking, M. (2006). Die Entwicklung, Validierung und Reliabilität von Kurzformen gängiger psychometrischer Instrumente zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Fortschritts in Psychotherapie. Diagnostica, 52, 11-25. (Pubitemid 44964664)
30. Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, A., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S. et al. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 439-476.
31. Mennin, D. S., Holaway, R. M., Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T. & Heimberg, R. G. (2007). Delineating components of emotion and its dysregulation in anxiety and mood psychopathology. Behavior Therapy, 38, 284-302. (Pubitemid 47223163)
32. Mokken, R. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague/Berlin: Mouton/De Gruyter.
33. O'Connor, B. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
34. Olsen, L. R., Mortensen, E. L. & Bech, P. (2004). The SCL-90 and SCL-90R versions validated by item response models in a Danish community sample. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 110, 225-229. (Pubitemid 39120326)
35. Palmieri, G., Evans, C., Hansen, V., Brancaleoni, G., Ferrari, S., Porcelli, P. et al. (2009). Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 16, 444-449.
36. Petrides, K. V., Pita, R. & Kokkinaki, F. (2007). The location of trait emotional intelligence in personality factor space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273-289.
37. Percevic, R., Gallas, C., Wolf, M., Haug, S., Hünerfauth, T., Schwarz, M. et al. (2005). Das Klinisch Psychologische Diagnosesystem 38 (KPD-38). Diagnostica, 51, 134-144.
38. Popp, K., Schäfer, R., Schneider, C., Brähler, E., Decker, O., Hardt, J. et al. (2008). Faktorstruktur und Reliabilität der Toronto-Alexithymie-Skala (TAS-20) in der deutschen Bevölkerung. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 58, 208-214. (Pubitemid 351774618)
39. Reise, S. P. & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27-48.
40. Schäfer, R., Schneider, C., Sitte, W. & Franz, M. (2002). Validitätshinweise der deutschen Version der TAS-20. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 52, 449-453.
41. Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N., Baldini, C., Rollnik, J. & Tress, W. (2001). Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO-FFI in psychosomatic outpatients. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 713-722. (Pubitemid 33619603)
42. Schmitz, N., Hartkamp, N., Kiuse, J., Franke, G. H., Reister, G. & Tress, W. (2000). The Symptom Check-List-90-R (SCL-90-R): A German validation study. Quality of Life Research, 9, 185-193.
43. Schumacher, J., Wilz, G., Gunzelmann, T. & Brähler, E. (2000). Die Sense of Coherence Scale von Antonovsky. Teststatistische Überprüfung in einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsstichprobe und Konstruktion einer Kurzskala. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 50, 472-482. (Pubitemid 32049795)
44. Schwenkmezger, P., Hodapp, V. & Spielberger, C. D. (1992). Das State-Trait-Ärgerausdrucks-Inventar. Bern: Huber.
45. Sijtsma, K. & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Simson, U., Martin, K., Schäfer, R., Janssen, P. & Franz, M. (2005). Alexithymie in einer klinischen Stichprobe. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 55, 347-353. (Pubitemid 40979995)
47. Stulz, N. & Crits-Christoph, P. (2010). Distinguishing anxiety and depression in self-report: Purification of the Beck Anxiety Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory-II. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66, 927-940.
48. Van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1-19.
49. Vassend, O. & Skrondal, A. (1999). The problem of structural indeterminacy in multidimensional symptom report instruments. The case of SCL-90-R. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 685-701. (Pubitemid 29241788)
50. Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J. & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354-365. (Pubitemid 126670695)
51. Zwick, W. R. & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.