Relating Carneades with abstract argumentation via the ASPIC + framework for structured argumentation

Argument and Computation

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 21-47

  Van Gijzel, Bas ^a   Prakken, Henry ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

abstract argumentation; burden of proof; non monotonic reasoning; proof standards; structured argumentation

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION; BURDEN OF PROOF; DISTINCTIVE FEATURES; LEGAL REASONING; NON-MONOTONIC REASONING; STRUCTURED ARGUMENTATION;

SEMANTICS; STANDARDS;

ABSTRACTING;

EID: 84859193619     PISSN: 19462166     EISSN: 19462174     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19462166.2012.661766     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Amgoud, L. A Unified Setting for Inference and Decision: An Argumentation-Based Approach. Proceedings of the 21st Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. pp. 26-33. AUAI Press.
2. Amgoud, L., Bodenstaff, L., Caminada, M., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Prakken, H., van Veenen, J., and Vreeswijk, G. (2006), Final Review and Report on Formal Argumentation System, Deliverable D2.6, ASPIC IST-FP6-002307, ASPIC Consortium
3. Atkinson, K., and, Bench-Capon, T. Argumentation and Standards of Proof. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-07). Stanford, CA. pp. 107-116. New York: ACM.
4. Baroni, P., and, Giacomin, M. 2007. On Principle-Based Evaluation of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 171: 675-700. (Pubitemid 47285076)
5. Baroni, P., and, Giacomin, M. 2009. Semantics of Abstract Argument Systems. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Edited by: Simari, G. and Rahwan, I. 25-44. New York: Springer.
6. Bench-Capon, T. J.M., Doutre, S., and, Dunne, P. E. 2007. Audiences in Argumentation Frameworks. Artificial Intelligence, 171: 42-71. (Pubitemid 46073928)
7. Besnard, P., and, Hunter, A. 2008. Elements of Argumentation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R. A., and, Toni, F. 1997. An Abstract, Argumentation-Theoretic Framework for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 93: 63-101. (Pubitemid 127401113)
9. Brewka, G., and, Gordon, T. F. 2010a. Carneades and Abstract Dialectical Frameworks: A Reconstruction. In Computational Models of Argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2010, Edited by: Giacomin, M. and Simari, G. R. 3-12. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
10. Brewka, G., and, Woltran, S. Abstract Dialectical Frameworks. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. pp. 102-111. AAAI Press.
11. Brewka, G., Dunne, P. E., and, Woltran, S. Relating the Semantics of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and Standard AFs. Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-11). pp. 780-785.
12. Caminada, M., and, Amgoud, L. 2007. On the Evaluation of Argumentation Formalisms. Artificial Intelligence, 171: 286-310. (Pubitemid 46560479)
13. Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L., and, Stein, C. Introduction to Algorithms, 2, MIT Press and McGraw-Hill.
14. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence, 77: 321-357.
15. Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R. A., and, Toni, F. 2009. Assumption-Based Argumentation. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Edited by: Rahwan, I. and Simari, G. 199-218. Berlin: Springer.
16. Dung, P. M., Mancarella, P., and, Toni, F. 2007. Computing Ideal Sceptical Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence, 171: 642-674. (Pubitemid 47285080)
17. Dunne, P. E. 1988. The Complexity of Boolean Networks, San Diego, CA: Academic Press Professional, Inc.
18. Farley, A. M., and, Freeman, K. Burden of Proof in Legal Argumentation. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-05). College Park, MD. pp. 156-164. New York: ACM.
19. Freeman, K., and, Farley, A. M. 1996. A Model of Argumentation and Its Application to Legal Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4: 163-197. doi:10.1007/BF00118492 (Pubitemid 126706888)
20. van Gijzel, B. 2011. Relating Proof Standards and Abstract Argumentation. Utrecht University. Master's thesis
21. van Gijzel, B., and, Prakken, H. Relating Carneades with Abstract Argumentation. Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-11). pp. 1113-1119.
22. Gordon, T. F. 2010. An Overview of the Carneades Argumentation Support System. In Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation. An Examination of Douglas Walton's Theories of Reasoning, Edited by: Tindale, C. and Reed, C. 145-156. London: College Publications.
23. Gordon, T. F., and, Walton, D. Legal Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL-09). pp. 137-146. Barcelona, New York: ACM.
24. Gordon, T. F., and, Walton, D. 2009b. Proof Burdens and Standards. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Edited by: Simari, G. and Rahwan, I. 239-258. New York: Springer.
25. Gordon, T. F., Prakken, H., and, Walton, D. 2007. The Carneades Model of Argument and Burden of Proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171: 875-896. (Pubitemid 47285070)
26. Governatori, G. On the Relationship Between Carneades and Defeasible Logic. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2011). Edited by: van Engers, T. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM Press.
27. Governatori, G., Maher, M., Antoniou, G., and, Billington, D. Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logics. Proceedings of the 6th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 27-37. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. PRICAI00, Melbourne, Berlin
28. Modgil, S., and, Prakken, H. Revisiting Preferences and Argumentation. Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-11). pp. 1021-1026.
29. Nute, D. 1994. Defeasible Logic. In Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Edited by: Gabbay, Dov M., Hogger, C. J. and Robinson, J. A. Vol. 3, 353-395. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Prakken, H. 2010. An Abstract Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments. Argument & Computation, 1: 93-124.
31. Prakken, H., and, Sartor, G. On Modelling Burdens and Standards of Proof in Structured Argumentation. Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2011: The 24th Annual Conference. Edited by: Atkinson, K. pp. 83-92. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
32. Reiter, R. 1980. A Logic for Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13: 81-132.
33. Vreeswijk, G. (1993), Studies in Defeasible Argumentation, Doctoral dissertation, Free University Amsterdam
34. Vreeswijk, G. 1997. Abstract Argumentation Systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90: 225-279. (Pubitemid 127398371)